what was an unintended consequence of prohibition according to the video: check all that apply

Cardinal Richelieu created a large bureaucracy of "intendants" who were loyal to the monarchy in order to undermine conspiracies against the power of the king.

Intendants were royal officials who were appointed to oversee the administration of the kingdom's provinces. Richelieu believed that the local nobility and other powerful individuals in the provinces posed a threat to the central authority of the king. To counter this, he created a bureaucracy of intendants who were responsible for enforcing the king's laws and policies and reporting any plots or rebellions to the crown. The intendants were chosen for their loyalty to the monarchy and their lack of ties to the local nobility, which helped to ensure that they were not influenced by regional interests. Overall, Cardinal Richelieu's creation of the bureaucracy of intendants was a significant step in the centralization of power in France and helped to ensure the stability and longevity of the French monarchy during the 17th century.

To learn more about Cardinal Richelieu here:

https://brainly.com/question/10691669

#SPJ4

To bring a lawsuit in a court, the plaintiff must stand the sue, the court must have personal jurisdiction, and the case must be brought in the proper venue.

Hence, the correct option is C.

A person who brings a lawsuit must provide sufficient evidence to convince the commission of such an act by the defendant in front of the jury, it is necessary that the court where the lawsuit has been presented must have Jurisdiction over the parties based on the facts and evidence provided, and the lawsuit must be brought in the jurisdiction of the authority where the crime occurred.

To know more about  "law suit"

brainly.com/question/15028192

#SPJ4

In the United States, the government organization in charge of upholding advertising regulations Commission (FTC). The FTC is an independent group tasked with defending consumers from misleading advertising

Federal customer protection laws are enforced by the FTC to stop fraud, deceit, and unfair competition. Additionally, the Commission upholds federal antitrust laws, which forbid anticompetitive merger and acquisition and other commercial activities that might result in higher costs, fewer options, or less innovation.

The Federal Trade Commissioner (FTC) is a federal govt organization founded in 1914 to stop unfair, dishonest, or anticompetitive business practices. According to its definition, the FTC has two goals: (1) to protect consumers, and (2) to advance

To know more about FTC visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23015428

#SPJ4

Pretrial conference, trial, posttrial motions, appeal, steps to enforce judgment are in the proper order of a typical lawsuit.

The correct answer is option A.

The parties filing their "first disclosures" and holding the preliminary pretrial conference are the first stages in the pretrial procedure. Unless there has already been a hearing on a pretrial motion, the parties typically appear before the judge for the first time during the preliminary pretrial conference.

The court meets with the parties to examine the case's potential concerns, the anticipated length of pretrial discovery, and any issues that may make the case special. Usually at the pretrial hearing or shortly thereafter, the court issues a scheduling order outlining deadlines for specific actions to be taken in a lawsuit.

Know more about Pretrial conference here

https://brainly.com/question/3736187

#SPJ4

In response to societal movements aiming to alleviate inequalities in women's educational opportunities, members of Congress inserted the amendment to the law title.

The Education Amendments of 1972, which included Title IX, were passed in response to demands from the general public for more equality. Which of the following effects of Title IX has been the most notable A rise in female involvement in high school and college sports The Education Amendments Act of 1972's Title IX. No one in the United States may be denied access to, barred from participation in, or subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity that receives financial support from the federal government, according to Title IX. A constituent contacts a congresswoman to urge her to cast her ballot. On a bill, yes. This rule, which is frequently referred to as simply Title IX, forbids gender discrimination in educational settings at any institution receiving federal funding. Although it is most famous for its impact on athletics, it also outlaws all forms of gender discrimination in the classroom.

Learn more about title here :

https://brainly.com/question/12983455

#SPJ4

The mexican government refuse to honor the terms of the treaty of velasco  because Santa Anna signed the treaties as a captive.

The Texans government decisively defeated the Mexican army forces led by General Santa Anna on April 21, 1836, at San Jacinto. Santa Anna made an attempt to escape while dressed as a common soldier, but was captured the next day. Santa Anna and David G. Burnet, the acting president of Texas, signed two peace treaties on May 14. Ten articles made up the public treaty, and six more items made up the secret pact. When the terms of the open treaty were met, the secret agreement would be put into effect. The official treaty stipulated that fighting would end, Santa Anna would withdraw his men below the Rio Grande, and he would refrain from waging war against Texas in the future.

Learn more on government here:

brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ4

True : there should always be two officials on the side of the court where the ball is being inbounded

Any person or entity, typically a government organisation, with the authority to resolve legal disputes between parties and deliver justice in civil, criminal, and administrative cases in accordance with the law is referred to as a court.In both common law and civil law legal systems, it is widely acknowledged that everyone has the right to assert their legal rights in court. In both of these systems, courts serve as the primary forum for conflict settlement. Similar to this, a criminal defendant has the right to defend themselves in court.The system of courts known as the judiciary decides how the law should be understood and applied. The place where a court meets is known as a venue. the location of court

Learn more about court :

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ4

Limiting campaign contributions has both benefits and drawbacks. The primary benefit is that it reduces the influence of wealthy individuals and special interest groups on elections, promoting fairness and democratic values.

A political campaign is a well-organized effort to influence decision-making within a specific group.

It also aids in the prevention of corruption by removing the incentive for politicians to favor the interests of their biggest donors. Limiting campaign contributions, on the other hand, can have negative consequences.

It has the potential to limit free speech by prohibiting individuals and groups from expressing their political views through monetary contributions. Furthermore, limits may disproportionately affect smaller political parties and candidates, making it more difficult for them to compete with well-funded opponents.

Therefore, whether there should be limits on campaign contributions is a matter of debate.

To learn more about campaign, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13561913

#SPJ1

That is accurate, yes. In the US law system, a party that is unsuccessful at trial may ask for the case to be appealed to a lower court. A higher court will review the decision of the lower court's in an appeal.

court, also known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide cases involving civil, criminal, canon law, or military disputes.

What actually occurred and what must be accomplished about it are decided by the courts. They determine whether a person has committed an offense and the appropriate level of punishment. They also offer a peaceful means of settling individual disputes that people are unable to settle on their own.

To know more about court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29766399

#SPJ4

Grasp the complexities and a variety of regulations that apply to transportation and cargo on navigable waters. When describing law in 1897, lawyer Oliver Howard Holmes, Jr. said: "The forecasts of what courts will accomplish in fact, &. nothing more pompous, are just what I understand by the law.

" He spent 15 years practising law at Boston law firms, serving as editor of the American Law Journal and a law professor at his alma school. At the age of 40, Holmes had already established himself as one of the foremost legal thinkers in the United States, as evidenced by the publication of his work "The Common Law" in 1881. The practise of law has been based on experience rather than logic. This well-known quote by John Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Learn more about law

https://brainly.com/question/13242861

#SPJ4

The Magna Carta, signed in 1215, is widely considered to be the first document to establish the principle of the rule of law.

Magna Carta was issued in June 1215 and was the first document to put into writing the principle that the king and his government was not above the law. It sought to prevent the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits of royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself.

Magna Carta was written by a group of 13th-century barons to protect their rights and property against a tyrannical king. It is concerned with many practical matters and specific grievances relevant to the feudal system under which they lived

To know more about Magna Carta visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1619167

#SPJ4

Tort, which derives from the Anglo-French language, is defined as "wrong" or "a unlawful conduct." A tort is a civil wrong or injury that happens when one party violates a duty owed to another party, leading to harm or damage, according to legal definitions.

Old French and Old English were blended to create Anglo-French, which was used by the aristocracy in England from the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066 until the late 14th century. This language, which was also known as "Anglo-Norman French," was used for administration, law, and literature. It had a big impact on how the English language evolved. An original Middle English dialect that included Old French, Old Norse, and Old English finally emerged as a result of the Anglo-French language's long-term evolution and alteration. The many French loanwords and idioms in contemporary English are evidence of the Anglo-French heritage.

To learn more about Anglo-French visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/21601112

#SPJ4

A government that is strong enough to promote virtue in its citizens, according to James Madison, a key architect of the Constitution, is too powerful.

Because of his crucial contribution to the drafting and ratification of the Constitution, James Madison is referred to as its "Father." In the context of constitutional governance, any interventions and restrictions by the government have indeed been based on three assumptions, according to James M. Buchanan, one of the pioneers of constitutional economics and winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize for Economic Sciences in 1986. The division of powers refers to this process of allocating authority among the several branches of government. From then, the Framers created the federalist system, which further split authority between the federal government and the states.

Learn more about government

https://brainly.com/question/13540610

#SPJ4

Yes, it is the solution. You are no longer necessary to obtain a learners permit after you become 18 years old.

The written knowledge test is free, but if you pass, your learner's permit will cost you $60 and be good for up to two years. How can I obtain my permit in Newfoundland and Labrador

Student Permit

You must finish the Graduated Driver Licensing Program in order to obtain a driver's license in Newfoundland and Labrador (some exceptions may apply). The program is a methodical, step-by-step licensing procedure designed to assist new drivers in acquiring the information and skills necessary to do so safely.

To know more about learners permit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2128824

#SPJ4

Although it does not explicitly state it, the Constitution gives the President a number of specific powers, including the ability to veto legislation choose and judges and other members of the executive branch.

The President appoints the leaders of all federal agencies, including Cabinet, in order to carry out and enforce the laws passed by Congress. The Vice Chairman is a member of the Executive Subsidiary and is prepared to take over as President if necessary.

According to the Constitution, the president has the authority to veto or sign laws, command the military services, request the written advice of their Cabinet, call or adjourn Legislature, grant reprieves as well as pardons, and receive and transmit

To know more about power of president visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23771636

#SPJ4

The constitutional flaws of the most significant changes between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was the creation of three branches of government.

Two days later, the Continental Congress sent articles to the states, and a new government was approved in March 1781. The Articles were created to unify the 13 colonies, but established a largely decentralized government that gave most powers to the states and state legislatures.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the 13 states had full sovereignty under a decentralized government. State decentralization created tensions between states, and no progress was made without a unanimous decision by the 13 states.

To know more about decentralization visit :

https://brainly.com/question/12653061

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

I am not going to form opinions. Here are some arguments that could be made by Team 1 in support of the law requiring restaurant employees to know and employ the Heimlich maneuver:

In conclusion, there are strong arguments for the law requiring restaurant employees to know and employ the Heimlich maneuver. It is a simple, effective, and potentially life-saving technique that could make a significant difference in the outcome of a choking emergency.

_____________________________________________________

I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.

A juror may give testimony following a trial regarding unrelated, potentially damaging information that was presented to his attention but was not included. A petition for just a new trial would be supported by such information.

A defence attorney is indeed an advocate for the guilty and is in charge of defending their client's interests whether they are working with criminal or civil issues.  A petition for just a new trial would be supported by such information. When people or businesses are hauled before such a court as that of the defendant, a judgement could be rendered against them. Putting together a strong defence and creating a winning plan for their clients are the duties of a criminal defence lawyer. A juror may give testimony following a trial regarding unrelated, potentially damaging information that was presented to his attention but was not included.He must organise, file, or argue on behalf of the accused in his capacity as their advocate. A lawyer's duties include negotiating a plea deal with the prosecution.

(After a defendant was convicted by a jury of domestic violence, the defense attorney briefly discussed the case with a juror. The defense attorney learned the following information from the juror: (1) The juror learned from a court clerk that the defendant had been acquitted of domestic violence a year ago when the victim recanted her story. (2) The jury misunderstood the judge's instruction regarding the standard of proof to apply in the case. (3) The juror relied heavily on testimony that the judge had stricken from the record. (4) The juror's child was ill and the juror only agreed to the verdict because he wanted to go home.

Which of the above pieces of information would best support the defense attorney's motion for a new trial?)

Learn more about juror

https://brainly.com/question/27035549

#SPJ4

The draft laws during the Vietnam War in the US adhered to the idea of Legal Positivism, a school of jurisprudential thought that holds that the law is defined by the laws and regulations passed by a sovereign authority, regardless of any moral or ethical considerations.

Legal Positivism is a philosophical approach to law that emphasizes the importance of the written laws and regulations passed by a sovereign authority rather than moral or ethical considerations. According to this school of thought, the law is only valid if the appropriate authority has officially enacted it. In the case of the draft laws during the Vietnam War in the US, the government was considered the sovereign authority, and the laws passed by the government defined what was legally required of men of a certain age.

These laws were based on the idea that the government has the right to conscript individuals in times of national emergency and that individuals have a duty to serve their country in times of war. Legal Positivism holds that as long as these laws were enacted through the proper channels, they were valid and enforceable, regardless of any moral objections to the draft itself.

To learn more about Legal Positivism, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/13400221

#SPJ4

False, the legal phrase known as  rem jurisdiction refers to the authority that a court may exert over property or a "status" against a person over whom the court lacks in personam jurisdiction.

"Against a specific individual" is the meaning of the Latin term in personam . To grant the court jurisdiction to hear the case in a lawsuit where the defendant is a specific person, the defendant must be served with a summons and complaint (also known as Particulars of Claim (CPR 1999)), and the judgement is known as a "in personam judgement" if it relates to that person.

In personam is different from in rem, which refers to "all the globe" or property instead of a specific individual. To decide where to file a case and how to serve a defendant, it is crucial to understand this legal distinction. A judgement can be enforced against a person in personam, regardless of where they are.

To learn more about rem jurisdiction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9042709

#SPJ4

One concept that became a major objective of government after industrialization and urbanization is "economic growth."

Industrialization and urbanization led to significant changes in the economies of many countries, as new technologies and increased urbanization led to the growth of factories and businesses and a shift towards a more market-based economy. In response to these changes, governments around the world began to place a greater emphasis on promoting economic growth as a means of improving the standard of living for their citizens. Economic growth is typically defined as an increase in a country's gross domestic product (GDP), which is a measure of the total value of goods and services produced in the economy. Governments sought to promote economic growth through a variety of policies, such as investing in infrastructure, encouraging private investment, and creating favorable conditions for business. By promoting economic growth, governments aimed to create new jobs, raise incomes, and improve the overall well-being of their citizens.

The complete question is :

which of the following concepts became a major objective of government after industrialization and urbanization?

a. Social welfare

b. Environmental protection

c.economic growth

d. Political stability

e .National security

To learn more about economic growth here:

https://brainly.com/question/11679822

#SPJ4

Although the Constitution does not explicitly enable courts to evaluate legislative and government movements to determine whether they are constitutional, early common law established this process, which is regarded as judicial review. Judicial evaluate permits courts to evaluate the constitutionality of decrease courts' decisions.

The best-known energy of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the potential of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not observed within the textual content of the Constitution itself. The Court mounted this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

Federal courts experience the sole electricity to interpret the law, determine the constitutionality of the law, and apply it to individual cases. The courts, like Congress, can compel the manufacturing of proof and testimony thru the use of a subpoena.

Learn more about  review legislative and executive here;

https://brainly.com/question/14233010

#SPJ4

This statement is incorrect. The International Building Code (IBC) is a model building code developed by the International Code Council (ICC).

While local and state governments widely use the International Building Code in the United States, it is not adopted by the federal government. Adopting building codes, including the IBC, is typically the responsibility of state and local jurisdictions.

The United States does not have a single national building code that the federal government adopts. Instead, building codes are primarily the responsibility of state and local jurisdictions. Each state has the authority to adopt and enforce its own building codes, and many states have adopted the International Building Code (IBC) as their statewide building code.

To learn more about International Building Code, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/27365675

#SPJ4

A  petitioner challenges a certain law in the courts, saying the law causes unfair discrimination, so the question a judge would ask is: is the law necessary, or does it reflect a government preference? That is the third question.

The significance of the question is very high, as it helps the judge determine whether the law serves a legitimate government interest or not. To protect the constitution, the questions and answers are discussed in the courtroom.

Hence, a petitioner challenges a certain law in the courts, saying the law causes unfair discrimination, so the question a judge would ask is: is the law necessary, or does it reflect a government preference? That is the third question.

Learn more about the question for judges here.

https://brainly.com/question/28044605

#SPJ1

The appellate court is not an example of limited jurisdiction trial courts

Appellate courts hear and assess appeals in the American legal system. Appellate courts review the procedures and decisions made by the trial court to ensure that they are fair and that the correct law was applied. It is not an illustration of a trial court with restricted jurisdiction. In matters that have been appealed from lower courts, an appellate court instead evaluates the legal questions and arguments raised in written briefs and during oral arguments rather than conducting trials or hearing evidence.

The other three given options namely family court, traffic court, and probate court are all examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts, which are tribunals with the power to hear and decide issues pertaining to a specific area of law or subject matter.

Read more about the Appellate court on:

https://brainly.com/question/11744340

#SPJ4

Federal Arbitration Law refers to the set of federal laws in the United States that govern the arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution.

This includes the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) of 1925, which sets the standards for enforcing arbitration agreements in commercial contracts and outlines the procedures for conducting arbitrations. Courts have interpreted the FAA as promoting arbitration to resolve disputes efficiently and fairly.

The FAA outlines the procedures for conducting arbitrations, including the appointment of arbitrators, the exchange of information between the parties, and the rules for conducting hearings and rendering decisions. The Act also provides for limited judicial review of arbitration awards to ensure that the proceedings are fair and that the award is in accordance with the law.

Courts have interpreted the Federal Arbitration Law as promoting arbitration to resolve disputes efficiently and fairly. This is because arbitration provides a more streamlined process than the court system, with less formal rules of evidence and procedure and a quicker resolution to disputes. Additionally, arbitration can often result in a more equitable resolution,

To learn more about Federal Arbitration Law , visit here

https://brainly.com/question/24089171

#SPJ4

Owen is a federal judge whose judicial decisions are part of case law, which does not include interpretations of  (C) sound bites in the media.

Federal judges are those who serve on courts established by Article Three of the United States Constitution. The chief justice and associate justices of the United States Supreme Court, circuit judges of the United States Courts of Appeals, district judges of the United States District Courts, and judges of the United States Court of International Trade are among them. These judges are referred to as "Article Three judges" by many.

Unlike the president and vice president of the United States, as well as senators and representatives, federal judges in the United States are not elected officials. According to the Appointments Clause of Article Two of the United States Constitution, they are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Federal judges have life tenure under Article Three of the Constitution, and they keep their seats.

Learn more about Federal judges

https://brainly.com/question/29049116

#SPJ4

According to this understanding, diminishing a citizen's private law privileges or immunities in comparison to those of other citizens constitutes limiting their private law rights.

What does privilege mean in its entirety?

a privilege, immunity, or distinctive advantage bestowed as a right or favour: prerogative. especially: such an immunity or right connected exclusively to a job or an office. privilege.

The term "personal privilege" refers to an urgent motion to raise a question of privilege that affects a right or privilege of the Council, Committee, or of a particular member.

He was raised in a highly wealthy environment. Wealthy and aristocratic individuals are drawn to the place. A special position of trust belongs to the advisor to the president. She was granted exclusive access to the files.

Know more about  comparison Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1516829

#SPJ4

False. During depositions, a judge is not need to be present. Depositions are often made in a less formal environment, outside of the courtroom, where a judge is not needed to be present.

A witness or a party to a case may be formally interviewed during a deposition, which is conducted under oath in front of a court reporter or videographer. They are used to acquire data and proof during the discovery phase of a case. When a witness cannot testify in person, depositions are used to gather testimony that may be utilised in court.

They can also be used to clarify the evidence of a witness who will be testifying in person. Depositions can be recorded online or in person and are often conducted in a less formal environment outside of the courtroom. They are carried out by attorneys and can be used to establish facts, elucidate evidence, and cast doubt on a witness.

To know more about  Depositions  visit

brainly.com/question/18273856

#SPJ4

The Peruvian government has closed Machu Picchu and the renowned Inca Trail indefinitely due to continuous political protests that have resulted in several fatalities, the most of them during altercations with police.

It is recognized as the most magnificent urban development of the Inca Empire and one of the most important historic monuments in the entire globe.

It is located 2.430 meters up a mountain in a tropical forest.

The renowned Temple of the Sun in Machu Picchu. This extremely tall highland house would have had a unique, spiritual significance because mountains were holy to the Incas. Because of this, even Incas began to appreciate this royal metropolis.

To know more about Machu Picchu visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1659257

#SPJ4