In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used.
The greatest level of judicial review used by courts to determine whether laws, rules, or even other governmental policies are constitutional is known as strict scrutiny. When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used. The phrase "strict scrutiny" therefore refers to a standard that declares laws invalid unless they are "necessary," "narrowly drawn," or "closely tailored" to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest." Race, race, national origin, and (in some situations) alienage-based laws are all forms of discrimination.
(Strict scrutiny tests are applied to cases involving classifications based on __.
A. height
B. legitimacy
C. marriage
D. age
E. gender)
Learn more about scrutiny
https://brainly.com/question/29749587
#SPJ4
in the video, dr. barnes argues that american leaders need to understand how the united states differs from the countries with which they are doing business. she specifically states that us leaders need to be aware of how the united states is.
the United States Understanding how one's culture is seen by others and how this may affect one's ability to conduct business.
Dr. Barnes highlights the significance of American leaders having a thorough understanding of the political, economic, and cultural systems of the nations with which they are conducting business.
They may establish more productive and polite connections with others thanks to this understanding, which will ultimately produce better business results. American leaders may better negotiate the intricacies of international business and develop stronger partner relationships by taking the time to understand and respect the distinctions between the United States and other nations.
Working across cultural barriers is challenging, but it is possible if we are aware of the main areas of distinction, assess where we and our colleagues fall on the continuums, and make adjustments to fit in. We can forge connections and create the conditions for business success.
To know more about, Dr. Barnes,
https://brainly.com/question/15260869
FILL THE BLANK The American legal system gives considerable power to the jury; however, it also has devices for limiting that power. The _____ provides a judgment to one party before the jury gets a chance to decide the case.
the motion for a directed verdict provides a judgment to one party before the jury gets a chance to decide the case.
A verdict is the legally recognised conclusion of fact reached by a jury with regard to matters or questions submitted to them by the judge. A finding is the term used to describe the judge's decision at the end of a bench trial. A coroner's findings are now referred to as conclusions rather than verdicts in England and Wales (see Coroner Conclusions (formerly termed verdicts)). The terms "ver" (Latin for "true") and "dit," which are combined to form the word "verdict," come from the Latin verb veredictum, which means "to speak the truth" (Latin for "speech," which is the neuter past participle of the verb "to say," or "dictum" in English).
learn more about judgment here
https://brainly.com/question/2890222
#SPJ4
which of the following are the most common ways citizens typically get involved in the policy process?
Citizens typically get involved in the policy process by writing letters and emails
Writing letters and emails to their elected representatives, government officials, and other decision-makers is how citizens often participate in the policy-making process. This kind of participation is frequently referred to as grassroots advocacy or lobbying. Citizens can express their views, share their experiences and insights, and have their voices heard on key matters by submitting letters and emails.
This may affect the priorities of decision-makers and help shape policy decisions. Citizens can join advocacy groups and interest groups, attend town halls and other public events, participate in public meetings, and write letters and emails in addition to doing these things. Citizens can make their opinions known and influence policymaking by taking part in these activities.
Read more about the policy process on:
https://brainly.com/question/3006046
#SPJ4
Federalism is best defined as a system of government
a) where member nations meet in a multinational conference
b) in which power is divided between a national government and lower level governments
c) in which the national government is funded through direct taxation of local governments
d) in which authority is divided into separate branches and each individual branch is given some power over the other branches
In a federalist system of government, two tiers of government share control over a single territory. An encompassing national government is often in charge of exercising broad authority over larger geographical boundaries.
In the United States, how does federalism appear?The federal government of the United States is vested with the power to regulate interstate trade, declare war, run the postal service, and print money, among a number of other duties. One-of-a-kind powers are also available to state governments.
The benefits of federalism:Federalism encourages political engagement. Federalism promotes economic equity throughout the nation. Federalism allows for several governmental tiers. Federalism allows for a range of viewpoints.
To know more about federalism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
the __ clause of the constitution states that if there is a conflict between state law and federal law in an area of concurrent authority, the federal law takes precedence over the state law.
The Supremacy Clause is included in the U.S. Constitution's Article VI, paragraph 2. It claims that federal law, which includes the constitution, takes precedence over state legislation and even state constitutions.
How does the Supremacy Clause work?The Supremacy Clause is included in the U.S. Constitution's Article VI, paragraph 2. It claims that federal law, which includes the constitution, takes precedence over state legislation and even state constitutions.
What is the Supremacy Clause's primary justification?The provision gave the Supreme Court the power to support the creation of a robust federal government. The U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause was included because the Articles of Confederation did not have one.
To know more about supremacy clause visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
a restaurant that complies with all the safety statutes and ordinances applicable to it will never be liable for negligence regardless of how a patron is injured. (True or False)
Everyone is required by law to act responsibly and refrain from hurting others. People may be held "liable" (responsible) for the harm they create when they violate this legal obligation injured.
Strict Liability: Responsibility without regard to guilt. People who engage in excessively risky behavior, use harmful animals, or produce defective goods are subject to strict liability. Since deliberate torts, strict responsibility, and goods liability are not negligence-based legal theories, contributory negligence cannot be used to defend against these claims. Contributory negligence is the theory that, in order to be entitled to damages, the plaintiff must not have contributed to his own injury. Assault. A visitor pays for a hotel stay with a stolen credit card and authorizes the true cardholder's name. Generally speaking, the law holds each person accountable for the results of their own acts. If your reckless or willful behavior causes harm to another person, you may be held civilly liable for the reasonable financial value of any losses that were directly brought on by your conduct injured.
Learn more about injured here :
https://brainly.com/question/13323290
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. gerard works for a weekly magazine in the state of california. he is held responsible for publishing an article that falsely accuses the governor of the state. in this case, gerard is most likely to be accused of___. question 15 options: larceny slander embezzlement libel battery
Gerard works for a weekly magazine in the state of California. He is held responsible for publishing an article that falsely accuses the state's governor. In this case, Gerard is most likely to be accused of libel.
Libel is a written or published false statement that injures a third party's reputation. In this case, if Gerard published an article falsely accusing the state governor, he may be accused of libel. This is because the false statement made in the article could harm the governor's reputation and cause harm to their image or standing in the community.
In the United States, libel is considered a type of defamation and is illegal. Gerard may face civil or criminal penalties, including monetary damages and jail time, if found guilty.
To learn more libel, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29642112
#SPJ4
which of the following programs are generally funded by mandatory contributions through some form of taxation?
Option (A) Social insurance programs are generally funded by mandatory contributions through some form of taxation.
Social insurance is a type of social welfare that offers protection against economic risks. Insurance can be provided either publicly or by subsidized private insurance. Individuals' claims are partly dependent on their contributions, which can be considered insurance premiums to create a common fund from which the individuals are then paid benefits in the future, in contrast to other forms of social assistance.
Among the various types of social insurance are:
Health-care coverage provided by the governmentSocial Security benefitsUnemployment Insurance for the General PopulationAuto insurance for the general publicParental leave for allLearn more about Social insurance
https://brainly.com/question/11220625
#SPJ4
FUll Question :which of the following programs are generally funded by mandatory contributions through some form of taxation?
Social insurance
Prospective payment
Retrospective payment
Primary care
During the late 19th century, some United States newspapers printed exaggerated accounts of Spanish cruelty in Cuba. These reports helped to bring about the Spanish-American War primarily byanswer choicesarousing public opinion againstSpainprovoking the anger of thebusiness communityalienating the Spanishgovernmentencouraging the formation ofSpanish revolutionary groups
These reports helped to bring about the Spanish-American War primarily by arousing public opinion against Spain .
An individual's collective attitudes and beliefs about one or more issues. poll. A scientific effort to measure how a group as a whole thinks about a problem by asking a small sample of the group for their opinion. political socialization. A worldview or worldview or worldview is the basic cognitive orientation of an individual or society, encompassing the entire knowledge, culture, and perspectives of an individual or society.
Majority tyranny (or mass tyranny) is the inherent weakness of majority rule, in which the majority of voters pursue only their own ends at the expense of minority factions.
To know more about public opinion visit :
https://brainly.com/question/24262123
#SPJ4
The correct question :
During the late 19th century, some United States newspapers printed exaggerated accounts of Spanish cruelty in Cuba. These reports helped to bring about the Spanish-American War primarily by ______
online privacy alliance (opa) is an organization of companies dedicated to protecting online privacy. members of opa agree to create a privacy policy for a customer that is easy to read and understand. which of the following provisions is not included in the policy?
Online Privacy Alliance (OPA)" has a specific list of provisions that must or must not be included in its members' privacy policies. Privacy policies vary greatly depending on the company, country, and industry.
Privacy policies usually include information about what personal data is collected, how it's used, who it's shared with, and the rights of the individuals whose data is collected. A privacy policy is a statement or legal document that discloses how a party gathers uses, discloses, and manages a customer or client's data. It fulfills a legal requirement to protect a customer or client's privacy.
The contents of an online privacy alliance can vary greatly depending on the company, industry, and country in which it operates. However, in general, a privacy policy should include the following information:
What personal data is being collected: The types of information that a company collects from its customers or clients, such as name, address, email address, or payment information.How the data is being used: The purpose for which the data is collected and used, such as to process transactions, to provide customer support, or for marketing purposes.Who the data is shared with: The third-party companies or organizations with whom the data may be shared, such as service providers, advertising networks, or government agencies.It's important to note that a privacy policy is a legally binding document, and companies that violate their own privacy policies can face legal consequences. Therefore, it's crucial for companies to ensure that their privacy policies are up-to-date, transparent, and easy for customers to understand.
To learn more about online privacy alliances, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/14896344
#SPJ4
select all of the positive features of bureaucracy according to max weber. (choose every correct answer.) multiple select question. procedural ambiguity merit-based careers strong personal connections formal rules and procedures specialists for complex tasks impersonality clear hierarchy
The correct answer is procedural ambiguity, formal rules and procedures, specialists for complex tasks, impersonality, and clear hierarchy.
Max Weber, a German sociologist, viewed bureaucracy as the most rational and efficient form of organization. He identified the following five positive features of bureaucracy:
Procedural Ambiguity: Bureaucracies operate based on clearly defined rules and procedures, reducing room for interpretation and decision-making biases. This can lead to more consistent and fair decision-making.
Formal rules and procedures: Bureaucracies follow standardized procedures, reducing the chances of corruption and personal biases. This ensures that decisions are based on merit and not personal connections.
Specialists for complex tasks: Bureaucracies often have specialized personnel trained to handle complex tasks. This ensures that individuals with the necessary expertise make decisions.
To learn more about Procedural Ambiguity, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/15294467
#SPJ4
the decisions of the supreme court in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries generally did which of the following?
The decisions of the supreme court in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries Strengthened the position of big business .
The Bill of Rights was heavily influenced by the Virginia Declaration of Rights written by George Mason. Other predecessors are English documents such as the Magna Carta, the Petition for Rights, the British Bill of Rights, and the Massachusetts Body of Liberty.
Analyze the reasons for the emergence of the populist movement in the late 19th century. Populism emerged in his late nineteenth century as farmers frustrated with high debts and low prices, thought banks and railroads too powerful, and governments unresponsive to people's needs.
To know more about supreme court visit :
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
in active managerial control which government agency identifies the critical risk factors
The government agency in charge of monitoring the specific industry or sector will typically identify the critical risk factors in the framework of Active Managerial Control (AMC).
What Exactly Does "Active Managerial Control" Mean?In order to exert control over the risk factors for foodborne illnesses, industry management must actively incorporate certain actions or procedures into how their company is run.
How can an operation achieve active managerial control?If necessary, take corrective action to address improper practices or behavior. frequent organisational oversight to ensure that all rules, regulations, and corrective measures are correctly followed. To ensure that all staff members follow procedures, retrain them as necessary.
To know more about Active Managerial Control visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19093496
#SPJ4
how many years is a term in the house of representatives?
In the House of Representatives a term lasts for two years. Due to the two-year terms that House of Representatives members are elected to, they must run for reelection every two years.
What number of people make up the House of Legislators?As non-voting lawmakers in the House, five delegates one and resident commissioner may vote in committees. Representatives are required to be 25 years old and to have been citizens of the United States for the at least 7 years. Representative terms last for two years.
A representative is what?Each representative, also known as a congress person or congresswoman, is chosen by the citizens of a particular congressional district to serve a two-year term. Representatives, among other things, present bills and resolutions, propose amendments, and serve
To know more about House of Representatives visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24614448
#SPJ4
ryan and rick enter into a business agreement to assemble and sell a monthly product subscription box for sports enthusiasts. a dispute arises over their partnership agreement. ryan decides to file a lawsuit against rick. in the middle of litigation, both ryan and rick decide that arbitration would be better and enter into an arbitration agreement. which of the following statements is true of this situation? question 13 options: this case is an example of a mandatory arbitration agreement. this case is an example of a caucus arbitration clause. this case is an example of a predispute arbitration clause. this case is an example of a court-required arbitration clause. this case is an example of a postdispute arbitration agreement.
This case is an example of a postdispute arbitration agreement means that an issue has arisen that could lead to litigation, but the parties instead decide to make an agreement to submit the case to binding arbitration.
A post-dispute arbitration clause or agreement may be drafted by the parties involved in a dispute. This occurs after a disagreement has already occurred. The parties can arbitrate their issue this manner rather than taking it to US courts. Pre-dispute agreements and clauses are far more frequent. The arbitration agreement may be signed either before or after a dispute has developed. The following is predicated on the idea that although the parties did not initially agree to arbitrate disputes, they have now made the decision to do so in order to avoid going to court.
To know more about disputes refer :
brainly.com/question/27187116
#SPJ4
fisma requires the department of commerce to create information security standards and guidelines. to which of the following organizations did the department of commerce delegate this responsibility?
The National Institute of Standards and Technology was given the task of developing information security standards and recommendations by the Department of Commerce in accordance with the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA).
What is FISMA?Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is a federal law in the United States that was passed in 2002 and creates a thorough framework to safeguard the information systems of the federal government. All federal agencies are required by FISMA to create, maintain, and execute information security plans that incorporate risk management, security planning, and security control evaluations. In accordance with FISMA, organizations must also submit yearly reports to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) detailing the security of their information systems and the efficacy of their security procedures. The purpose of FISMA is to guarantee that the federal government's information technology systems are safe and that sensitive data is shielded from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, interruption, alteration, or destruction.
To learn more about FISMA visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/30429375
#SPJ4
fill in the blank.the use of block grants, allowing states considerable leeway in how federal money is spent, was championed by president___under the name new federalism.
The use of block grants, allowing states considerable leeway in how federal money is spent, was championed by President Nixon under the name New Federalism.
A political theory known as "New Federalism" advocates devolution, or the handing of of some federal powers to the states in the United States. Unlike the political theory of Federalism from the eighteenth century, the main goal of New Federalism is to give the states back some of the autonomy and power that was taken from them by the federal government as a result of Predisent Franklin D Roosevelt's New Deal. Richard Nixon is largely responsible for the New Federalism's original concepts. The federal government often gives block grants to the states to address a social issue as part of the New Federalism policy concept. The federal government then keeps an eye on the results while giving the states a lot of latitude in how to carry out the programmes.
Learn more about New Federalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/10184325
#SPJ4
The Supreme Court's power of judicial review permits the Court to overrule all of the following EXCEPTanswer choiceslower-court decisionsState legislationexecutive ordersThe Bill of Rights
The Supreme Court's power of judicial review permits the Court to overrule all of the following except The Bill of Rights. Option (d) is correct.
What is Legislation?Legislation is the process or result of a legislature, parliament, or analogous governing body enrolling, enacting, or promulgating laws.
The Bill of Rights is significant not only for the freedoms it protects but also for demonstrating America's enduring commitment to self-improvement and the pursuit of a "more perfect union." Since 1791, 17 more Amendments to the Constitution have been ratified, bringing the total to 27.
Therefore, Option (d) is correct.
Learn more about Legislation, here;
https://brainly.com/question/29804648
#SPJ1
Assume Amy’s wants to do the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Based on this, which approach to resolving ethical dilemmas would the company most likely employ?Multiple Choicejusticeutilitarianuniversalmoral-rightsindividual
She would have to deal with dilemmas revolving around Utilitarian ethics and morality.
What is utilitarian ethics?A family of normative ethical theories that recommend behaviours to maximise the happiness and well-being of all individuals who are impacted is known as utilitarianism in the field of ethical philosophy.The fundamental principle behind all forms of utilitarianism is, in some sense, to maximise utility, which is frequently characterised in terms of well-being or related concepts. This is true even though different types of utilitarianism admit alternative characterizations. For instance, utilitarianism's creator Jeremy Bentham defined utility as Any object's ability to provide benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness—or to stop harm, suffering, evil, or unhappiness—for the party whose interest is being examined.
A variation of consequentialism known as utilitarianism contends that the only criteria for determining what is right and bad are the results of an action.
To learn more about ethical theories visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ4
The US Constitution establishes a system of government based on the principle of federalism.
The US Constitution establishes a system of government based on the principle of federalism which states that the authority to regulate is divided between federal and state governments.
What is Federalism?Federalism is a combined and compound form of government that divides the powers between a central government and local governments within the same political system. In the unions of states under the Old Swiss Confederacy, federalism as it is known now was first practiced.
The establishment of a strong constitutional framework of political institutions was one of the great accomplishments of the American founding. Federalism and the separation of powers, two significant elements of the U.S. Constitution, illustrate, in part, the framers' attempts to divide governmental power. Federalism restricts the scope of government by establishing two sovereign powers—the federal government and state governments—and limiting the influence of each.
Therefore, It states that the authority to regulate is divided between federal and state governments.
Learn more about Federalism, here;
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ1
teaching children to label state capitals may be a violation of which of the rights outlined by van houten et al. (1988)? a therapeutic environment a competent behavior analyst learning functional skills behavioral assessment
Teaching children to label state capitals may not necessarily violate the rights outlined by Van Houten et al. (1988) in their article "The Right to Effective Behavioral Treatment: Behavioral Assessment as a Key Component.
However, without more information on the specific situation, it is difficult to determine if a violation has occurred. In general, Van Houten et al. emphasized the importance of conducting thorough behavioral assessments, using evidence-based practices, and ensuring that the treatment provided is effective and meets the individual's needs in order to ensure the right to effective behavioral treatment. Labeling state capitals could potentially be seen as a functional skill that could improve the individual's quality of life and should not be considered a violation of the rights outlined by Van Houten et al. as long as the educational process is conducted in a therapeutic environment and is done competently by a behavioral analyst.
To learn more about van houten et al. here:
https://brainly.com/question/29641972
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. lombroso argued that violent criminals were evolutionary throwbacks or___, and the problem of crime rested upon the shoulders of individuals who were born to be violent and criminal.
lombroso argued that violent criminals were evolutionary throwbacks or Lombroso believed
A criminal is merely unlawful behaviour that has been approved by the government or another legal body. There is no precise and universally accepted definition of what constitutes a crime in contemporary criminal law[1]. Although statutory definitions have been provided for certain reasons, [2] [3] The prevalent viewpoint is that crime is a category that the law has created; in other words, something is a crime if the relevant and applicable law deems it to be one. [2] An action that hurts a group of people, a society, or the state in addition to harming an individual is described as a crime or offence (or criminal offence) in one definition ("a public wrong"). Such conduct is prohibited by law and carries a penalty.
Learn more about criminal:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ4
the __ clause of the constitution states that if there is a conflict between state law and federal law in an area of concurrent authority, the federal law takes precedence over the state law.
The supremacy clause of the constitution states that if there is a conflict between state law and federal law in an area of concurrent authority, federal law takes precedence over state law.
What is the supremacy clause?The Supremacy Clause is among the Constitution's most significant structural provisions. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the Supreme Court relied on the Clause to establish a robust role for the federal government in managing the nation's affairs. The clause allowed the Supreme Court to help establish a strong federal government. The Supremacy Clause was included in the U.S. Constitution because the Articles of Confederation lacked such a clause.
Under the Articles, federal laws did not and could not supersede state laws.
Learn more about clause, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1332399
#SPJ1
nations around the world have police and judicial systems that use firearms and imprisonment to help control erratic human behavior. what term is used to denote this legitimate use of force?
Political phoilosophers call this phenomena monopoly of violence, this empowers the state to enact legitamate use of violence in its territory when deemed nessasary.
What is a state?A state is a type of centralised political entity that establishes and upholds laws over a population within a given region. A state's definition is open to debate. Although alternative definitions are widespread, the German sociologist Max Weber's is the most generally used: a "state" is a polity that retains a monopoly on the legal use of violence. Statelessness societies like the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, which "do not have either wholly or even largely political institutions or roles," are examples of societies in which the lack of a state does not prohibit the existence of a community. A state's level of governance—which is used to assess its success or failure—is thought of as the core component of modern states.
To learn more about political institutions visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22370101
#SPJ4
All of the following were evidence of state-level Progressivism EXCEPT:a) Prohibition Lawsb) Direct Electionc) Abolition of child labord) Increased state spending on education
The following were all examples of state-level regulation. Progressivism APART FROM Prohibition Laws
For what does progressivism stand out?Progressives championed women's suffrage as a way to enhance democracy and bring a "purer" female vote into the political process. They also instituted direct primary elections, direct senatorial elections (rather than through state legislatures), initiative and referendum laws, and women's suffrage.
What in US history was progressivism?In the United States, the early 20th century saw economic growth and progressive change. The progressives, as they referred to themselves, strove to improve and secure American society. Through a variety of rules, they attempted to make large corporations more accountable.
To know more about progressivism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/541788
#SPJ4
what represents the greatest threat to federal information systems
Internal risks from individuals who have access to and working knowledge of their organization's computer resources pose the most dangers to federal information systems.
What is an example of a federal system?Federal Structure
A strong central government shares authority with states or provinces that have significant self-governance, typically through their own legislatures. Examples: Australia, the Federal Republic of Germany, the United States, and
A federal system of government is what?Federalism is a form of governance where authority is shared between a central government and local governments; in the United States, both the federal government and state governments have a significant amount of power.
To know more about federal system visit:
https://brainly.com/question/695831
#SPJ4
perkins is outraged because of a billboard that advertises a movie with what he considers offensive material. he sues the billboard company because his outrage caused him to miss a day at work and lose a day's pay. perkins case will be dismissed because he lacks .
He is standing to sue since his loss of a day's pay does not fall under any recognized legal injury. Furthermore, emotional distress or offense caused by a billboard advertisement is not valid grounds for a lawsuit.
This statement is indicating that the person in question does not have a valid legal case for suing, as their complaint does not qualify as a legally recognized injury. In general, for a lawsuit to be successful, the plaintiff must have suffered tangible harm that a court of law can compensate.
In this case, the loss of a day's pay is not considered a legally recognizable injury. Additionally, the emotional distress or offense caused by a billboard advertisement is not a valid basis for a lawsuit as it is not tangible harm. Therefore, the person is not able to move forward with the lawsuit.
To learn more billboard advertisements, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/24717629
#SPJ4
true or false, because the amendment process is so cumbersome, only 27 constitutional amendments have ever been proposed
All 27 of the United States Constitution's amendments have been put forth by Congress. Three-quarters of state legislatures approved 26 of these amendments, and three-quarters of state conventions approved one amendment.
What does that mean, the Constitution?
The constitution is the state's governing document. It outlines the fundamental principles that the state is governed by. It describes the relationships between the main state institutions and gives an overview of them (for example, between the executive, legislature and judiciary).
A constitution is essential because it ensures that those who decide on behalf of the people do so in a way that fairly represents their opinions. It also outlines how those in positions of authority can be held accountable by the people they are tasked with serving.
Know more about approved Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21515012
#SPJ4
True or False: generally, after a judgment is rendered at trial, the appeals court tries a case anew and hears new evidence.
The given statement is true.
That a court is considered to have original jurisdiction if it has the power to hear appeals from the trial court.
What is the court?
Any individual or organization with the authority to administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters in accordance with the law is referred to as a court. An individual or organization with the legal authority to hear and decide disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military matters is known as a court, often known as a court of law.
Only disputes between states or between ambassadors and other senior ministers are given original jurisdiction under the Constitution. Due to its appellate authority, the Court is able to review decisions made by lower courts.
For such more question on court
https://brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
T/F the u.s. constitution specifies how powers are allocated within state-level institutions.
False. The u.s. constitution does nots pecifies how powers are allocated within state-level institutions.
What is constitution?The constitution of a state serves as its guide. It outlines the principles by which the state is run. It gives a general overview of the state's main institutions and describes how the executive, legislative branch, and judicial branch interact with one another to peform fuction.
The constitution of a state specifies the concepts, the procedure, and the individuals who may enact laws there. The preamble and the seven articles in the United States Constitution outline the organization and functioning of the government to the state.
To know more about constitution visit
brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4