No, the court should not permit the friend to testify as to the husband's statement to him because the video recording must be produced.
Not from firsthand knowledge of the comment, the brother discovered that the husband made it by watching his video clip. The prosecution is required to provide the video tape as a result of the best evidence rule being in effect. The criminal law's adjudication process is known as criminal procedure. Although criminal procedure varies greatly by jurisdiction, the process often starts with a formal criminal charge, the defendant is either out on bond or in jail, and the outcome is either the defendant's conviction or acquittal.
Learn more about criminal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ4
true/false. police have more power in their handling of juveniles than they do with adults due to the in loco parentis doctrine.
True , police have more power in their handling of juveniles than they do with adults due to the in loco parentis doctrine.
Juveniles and police contacts. First, police are more frequently in contact with young people who are loitering on the streets, which may worry some local residents. Second, minors are more likely to develop negative opinions toward the police as a result of their frequent interactions with them. Handling of Youths. The police, courts, and corrections are the three fundamental parts of the juvenile justice system, which is similar to the adult criminal justice discrimination system in this regard. More often than not, the outcome of a police contact determines whether or not a child is processed into this system. Through the use of a method called systematic social observation, some research has looked at how patrol officers interact with young suspects.
To know more about discrimination refer :
brainly.com/question/30451144
#SPJ4
compare and contrast the ethical and political forces that affect the development and operation of the legal system and stare decisis.
The principle of stare decisis states that courts base their judgements on earlier, comparable cases. A precedent is a decision that has previously been made.
How exactly do you refer to a court?
A court, often known as a court of law, is an individual or group of individuals with the authority to hear and decide cases involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
The French word cour, which denotes an enclosed yard, is the root of the Latin expression crtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again means an enclosed yard or the tenants of such a yard.
There are essentially three tiers of courts in this nation: trial courts, where disputes initially surface, intermediate (appellate) courts, which hear the bulk of appeals, and courts of last resort.
Know more about decision Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29347050
#SPJ4
margo, a newly-qualified physical therapist, has been working with her patient simon for several weeks. he has made several comments on her appearance and clothing at previous appointments. at today’s appointment he grabbed her breast and made some lewd comments. what type of violence does this scenario depict?
The type of violence that this scenario depicts is client-on-worker.
What is workplace violence?
Workplace violence is defined as violence or the threat of violence directed at employees. It can happen inside or outside of the workplace and can range from threats and verbal abuse to physical assaults and homicide, which is one of the leading causes of job-related deaths. There are four major types of workplace violence, which are as follows: 1. Intention to commit a crime 2. Client/customer violence 3. Employee-on-employee 4. Personal connection Employers clearly play an important role in preventing workplace violence. Authorities can use a variety of methods to prevent workplace violence. Adopt and communicate a formal workplace violence prevention training policy and program to employees.
Learn more on authorities here:
brainly.com/question/30413882
#SPJ4
T/F the u.s. constitution specifies how powers are allocated within state-level institutions.
The assertion made is untrue. The distribution of authority among state-level institutions is not spelled out in the U.S. Constitution.
What, in plain terms, does the US Constitution entail?The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches and their respective responsibilities. It also defines the basic law of the United States federal government. It is the earliest continuous governmental constitution still in use and has come to represent Western legal precedent.
What makes the US Constitution significant?One of the main goals of the Charter of rights and freedoms as it was drafted by the General assembly was to establish a government with sufficient authority to act on a government level without compromising fundamental rights.
To know more about US Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28824274
#SPJ4
T/F a tort action may be commenced and tried either in the county or district where the tort was committed or where the defendant resides.
The statement is True. In the United States, a tort action may be commenced and tried either in the county or district where the tort was committed or where the defendant resides.
This is known as the principle of "venue," and it is based on the idea that a defendant should be able to defend themselves in a court that is convenient and accessible to them. By allowing a tort action to be brought in either the location where the tort was committed or where the defendant resides, the legal system ensures that plaintiffs can pursue justice and that defendants have a fair opportunity to defend themselves.
The principle of venue in tort law refers to where a lawsuit can be brought and tried. This principle is based on the idea that a defendant should be able to defend themselves in a court that is convenient and accessible to them. The venue is typically determined by the location where the tort was committed or the defendant's residence.
To learn more about principle of venue, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29788120
#SPJ4
Which government action was intended to ensure that African Americans could exercise their Fifteenth Amendment rights?
The Supreme Court decision in Sweatt v. Painter
The executive order to desegregate the U.S. Army
The passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
The Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson
Answer:
Explanation:
no dedo hacer
Answer:
B
Explanation:
got it on edge
because the amendment process is so cumbersome, only 27 constitutional amendments have ever been proposed. a. true b. false
The statement is false. Although the amendment process of the United States Constitution is a complex and deliberate process, it is not so cumbersome that only 27 amendments have been proposed.
In fact, since the adoption of the Constitution in 1787, a total of 27 amendments have been ratified and added to the Constitution, but many more have been proposed. According to the National Archives, more than 11,000 constitutional amendment proposals have been introduced in Congress since 1789.
So while in the United States Consitution amendment process is designed to be difficult, it has not been so cumbersome that it has prevented numerous amendment proposals from being made over the years.
To learn more about United States Consitution, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/28870513
#SPJ4
a defendant was charged with the murder of her own child. two months prior to trial, the prosecutor interviewed a family friend who had known the defend
The trial court also came to the conclusion that both the gunshot and the footprints at the crime site matched those on the shoes that had been found on the accused.
What exactly is a conclusion example?
The conclusion example, which includes the thesis's concluding paragraph or sentence and a summary of its main points, completes the essay.
A strong conclusion will summarise your key ideas and points, bringing together all relevant data with an emotive appeal for a concluding remark that connects with your audience.
What do you want the reader to know or understand?Introduce that concept in one sentence. Summarize the main points of the text without using the exact same terms. One entire sentence should contain both the topic and your justification or assertion.
Know more about found Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20133764
#SPJ4
true/false. in a series of cases called the insular cases, the supreme court held that the constitution did not fully apply to the recently acquired territories. this was a significant limitation of the scope of american freedom.
The statement is True. In a series of cases known as the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court held that the Constitutional did not fully apply to the recently acquired territories, which represented a significant limitation of the scope of American freedom.
These cases arose in the wake of the Spanish-American War, when the United States acquired new territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines. The Court held that these territories were not part of the United States and therefore were not entitled to the full protection of the Constitution.
This raised questions about the extent of American freedom and constitutional rights in these territories. This decision has been criticized for creating a two-tiered rights system and has had lasting implications for the relationship between the United States and its territories.
To learn more Constitutional, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/14398727
#SPJ4
alli, a resident of alabama, has obtained a valid judgment against karson, a resident of kentucky. in this case:
In this case, Alli, a resident of Alabama, has obtained a valid judgment against Karson, who is a resident of Kentucky. This means that the court in Alabama has ruled in favor of Alli and issued a judgment against Karson.
To enforce this judgment, Alli may need to take additional legal steps in Kentucky, where Karson resides. The exact steps will depend on the laws of Kentucky and the case's specific details. A judgment is a court's official decision in a lawsuit. Once a judgment has been entered, the winning party (in this case, Alli) can enforce their rights and collect what is owed to them.
To enforce a judgment in Kentucky, Alli may need to register the Alabama judgment in Kentucky and then take further steps to collect what is owed, such as garnishing wages, seizing bank accounts, or selling assets. The exact steps will depend on Kentucky's specific laws and procedures and the specific details of the case.
To learn more about Karson, visit here.
https://brainly.com/question/14084465
#SPJ4
which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?
The Correct option (A) (B) ;The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the United States' federal judiciary. It has final appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law.
It also has original jurisdiction over a limited number of cases, including "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party."
The court has the power of judicial review, which allows it to invalidate a statute for violating a constitutional provision. It can also overturn presidential directives if they violate the Constitution or statutory law.
Learn more about supreme court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Full question which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?
The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
the policy concerns of the population at large
the policy preferences of Congress
What region of the United States saw the beginnings of the industrial revolution
first?
O New England States
O Southern States
O Newly acquired Western States
O The Great Lakes region of the Northwest Territory
The region of the United States that saw the beginnings of the industrial revolution first was New England States.
What is Industrial Revolution?It broadly describes the transition from a handicraft-based economy to one dominated by industrial and machine production. These technological advancements brought about new methods of working and living that fundamentally altered civilization.
The Industrial Revolution was the gradual adoption of new manufacturing techniques in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States between roughly 1760 and some time between 1820 and 1840. The four different industrial revolutions are those involving coal, gas, electronics, nuclear power, the internet, and unrenewable energy. The New England States see the start of the industrial revolutions.
Learn more on United States here:
brainly.com/question/30156817
#SPJ4
a party who claims that he or she could not understand conractual terms because of tiny hard to read print on the back of an agreement and the excessive use of legalese is referring to which of the following
When one party doesn't carry out their obligations as stated in the contract, there is a breach of the agreement.
A party commits a breach when it disobeys one or more of its obligations under a contract, whether completely or partially. It may also convey its intent to breach the agreement or otherwise show that it is unable to fulfill its obligations. Overview. Any agreement that is not included in the formal contract is considered parol evidence in contract disputes. Instead than being based on words, an implied-in-fact contract is created by the actions of the parties. In other words, a legally binding contract is created by the way the parties interact. This implies that all of the components of a binding agreement can be inferred from the conduct of the parties. A breach of contract is a failure, without legal excuse, to perform any promise that forms all or part of the contract. This includes failure to perform in a manner that meets the standards of the industry or the requirements of any express warranty or implied warranty, including the implied warranty of merchantability.
Learn more about party here :
https://brainly.com/question/29990695
#SPJ4
where a long-arm statute is present, a defendant need not have minimum contact with a state for that state's courts to have jurisdiction over the defendant. (True or False)
True. A long-arm statute is a law that allows a state's courts to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant who does not have minimum contact with that state.
The purpose of a long-arm statute is to allow a state to reach out and assert jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant who has engaged in actions that have sufficient minimum contacts with the state. This means that even if the defendant does not have a physical presence in the state, the state's courts may still have jurisdiction over them if they have engaged in actions that are sufficient to establish minimum contacts with the state.This implies that even if the defendant has no physicality in the state, the state's courts can nevertheless have jurisdiction over them if they've taken activities that are sufficient to create even a minimal amount of contact with the state.
To learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
susan brings a lawsuit against houston hospital for harm to her knee as a result of surgery. what is the most likely cause of action for the wrong that was committed?
Susan brings a lawsuit against Houston Hospital for wrongfully damaging her knee during surgery. Tort is this wrongful act called.
A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the tortious act's perpetrator. Tort law is distinct from criminal law, which deals with criminal wrongs punishable by the state. While criminal law seeks to punish those who commit crimes, tort law seeks to compensate those who are harmed as a result of the actions of others.
In countries where the civil and criminal legal systems are separate, some wrongful acts, such as assault and battery, can result in both a civil lawsuit and a criminal prosecution.
Learn more about tort
https://brainly.com/question/14614720
#SPJ4
Full QuestionL:Susan brings a lawsuit against Houston Hospital for wrongfully damaging her knee during surgery. What is this wrongful act called?
A: Libel
B: Tort
C: Slander
D: Assault
determine graphically the magnitude and direction of their resultant using the parallelogram law. g
By using the parallelogram law the length of the diagonal is measured to be 1,391 N, and the value of is found to be 47.8°
The parallelogram law is used to determine the magnitude of the resultant force on the hook, which is represented graphically as 1,391 N and is located at 47.8° with the horizontal. Graphically displaying the magnitude and direction of the product of two or more vectors is possible using the parallelogram law.
In order to do this, the vectors must be represented as directed line segments, which must then be arranged tail to tail to form a parallelogram. The parallelogram's diagonal serves as the resultant vector. You can use the Pythagorean theorem to determine the length of the diagonal of the parallelogram and use that resulted information to determine the magnitude of the resultant vector.
Drawing a line from the tail of one vector to the head of the other will reveal the direction of the resulting vector. It is significant to remember that the parallelogram law is not restricted to just two vectors and is applicable to any number of vectors. By using the parallelogram law, one will be able to and can add several vectors together to find the sum of their components.
To learn more about parallelogram law: https://brainly.com/question/23867486
#SPJ4
Note that the full question is:
Two forces are applied as shown to a hook. Determine graphically the magnitude and direction of their resultant using ( a ) the parallelogram law
strict scrutiny tests are applied to cases involving classifications based on . question 11 options: legitimacy marriage height gender age
In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used.
The greatest level of judicial review used by courts to determine whether laws, rules, or even other governmental policies are constitutional is known as strict scrutiny. When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used. The phrase "strict scrutiny" therefore refers to a standard that declares laws invalid unless they are "necessary," "narrowly drawn," or "closely tailored" to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest." Race, race, national origin, and (in some situations) alienage-based laws are all forms of discrimination.
(Strict scrutiny tests are applied to cases involving classifications based on __.
A. height
B. legitimacy
C. marriage
D. age
E. gender)
Learn more about scrutiny
https://brainly.com/question/29749587
#SPJ4
A person writes negative posts on social media about people who immigrate into the United States. Their posts say that all immigrants should be refused entry, with force if necessary. The community calls for the person's arrest and conviction, claiming that their speech is hateful and must be banned.
Which statement about this scenario is true?
Negative expression is not protected, but there are limits to punishment for it.
Negative expression is also a protected right, regardless of the circumstances.
Negative expression is not protected and the person can be arrested and punished.
Negative expression is also a protected right unless it was intended and led to violence.
If a person writes negative posts on social media about people who immigrate into the United States. The correct statement about this scenario is: D. Negative expression is also a protected right unless it was intended and led to violence.
How Negative expression is also a protected right?In the United States, freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution and this freedom of speech help to give people the right to express their opinions or thought including negative opinions, without fear of government retaliation.
In this scenario, if the person's speech was intended to incite violence against immigrants and posed a direct and immediate threat, it may be considered unprotected and subject to punishment. However, if the speech was simply hateful or offensive but did not directly incite violence, it would still be protected by the First Amendment.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about Negative expression is also a protected right here:https://brainly.com/question/28449529
#SPJ1
which of the following is a microeconomic topic? what the government will do to address unemployment the effect of the budget deficit on the rate of interest reasons why inflation is rising reasons why a consumer buys more cheese
The study of individual economic agents, such as households and businesses, and how they behave and make decisions is known as microeconomics.
It investigates how these agents behave in markets and divide scarce resources between competing uses.
Microeconomic issues include things like "reasons a consumer purchases more cheese," "the effect of changes in a good's price on the quantity purchased," and "the determination of market price through supply and demand."
In contrast, macroeconomic topics like "What the government will do to address unemployment" and "The effect of the budget deficit on the rate of interest" look at the operation and composition of the entire economy.
To learn more about Microeconomy,
https://brainly.com/question/28183019
#SPJ4
what amendment is the right not to testify against oneself
Fifth amendment is the right not to testify against oneself.
What is amendment?Two different sorts of modifications to the Indian Constitution are mentioned in Article 368. A special majority of the Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) is required for one form of amendment, and a special majority of the Parliament and approval by half of the states is required for a second type of amendment. However, other articles allow for the change of certain Constitutional provisions by a simple majority of Parliament, or a majority of the members of each House present and voting, i.e., a majority of those present and voting.
Learn more on Constitution here:
brainly.com/question/30413880
#SPJ4
the multiplication law is potentially helpful when we are interested in computing the probability of .
The multiplication law, also known as the law of independent events, is a fundamental concept in probability theory that can be very useful when computing the probability of certain events. It states that if two events.
In mathematical terms, if A and B are independent events with probabilities P(A) and P(B), then the probability of both events occurring together, P(A and B), can be expressed as:
P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B)
This law can be particularly helpful when we are interested in computing the probability of an event that is the result of two or more independent events. P(heads and ace) = P(heads) * P(ace)
where P(heads) is the probability of flipping heads on a coin (0.5) and P(ace) is the probability of drawing an ace from a deck of cards (4/52). Multiplying these probabilities, we find that P(heads and ace) = 0.5 * 4/52 = 2/52, which represents the probability of both events occurring together. In summary, the multiplication law is a useful tool when computing the probability of an event that is the result of two or more independent events. By multiplying the individual probabilities of the events, we can find the probability of both events occurring together.
To learn more about multiplication law here:
https://brainly.com/question/14019104
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. when a defendant who has been served wants to sue a plaintiff, the plaintiff becomes a___. question 10 options: counterplaintiff defendant appellee counterdefendant appellant
.When a defendant who has been served wants to sue a plaintiff, the plaintiff becomes a counterplaintiff Option (a)
The plaintiff is the party who files a lawsuit (also known as an action) in court. The plaintiff is seeking legal redress in this manner. If the search is successful, the court will enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and issue the necessary court orders .
"Plaintiff" is the term used in civil cases in most English-speaking jurisdictions, the notable exceptions being England and Wales, where a plaintiff has, since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules in 1999, been known as a "claimant" and Scotland, where the party has always been known as the "pursuer". In criminal cases, the prosecutor brings the case against the defendant, but the key complaining party is often called the "complainant".
Learn more about plaintiff
https://brainly.com/question/29213554
#SPJ4
The "real heart" of the progressive movement was the effort by reformers to
a. preserve world peace.
b. use the government as an agency of human welfare.
c. ensure the Jeffersonian style of government.
d. get the government off the backs of the people.
e. promote economic and social equality.
The real goal of the progressive movement was to promote social and economic reality.
What was the progressive era?The Progressive Era's leaders worked on issues including labour rights, women's suffrage, economic reform, environmental protections, and the care of the poor, particularly destitute immigrants. These issues overlapped with one another.
Unions persisted in pressing for better living and working circumstances. Significant issues at the time were the push for an eight-hour workweek, restrictions on child labour, greater salaries, and workplace safety regulations.
The excesses and inequities of the Golden Age were curbed by economic reformers. Because the public opposed monopolies, legislators tried to restrict the massive corporations that held both economic and political power. Monopolies and trusts were broken up and prevented by the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was created in 1890 in response to monopolies in the railroad and steel industries.
To learn more about the progressive movements visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9369850
#SPJ4
during the middle ages, linen was becoming rare and laws were created to limit its use as a burial material. this is mainly because linen was needed or used for
During the middle ages, linen became rare, and laws were created to limit its use as a burial material. This is mainly because linen was needed or used for other purposes, such as clothing, household items, and trade.
The scarcity of linen led to laws being created to regulate its use as a burial material to conserve it for other important needs. Linen was used to making a wide range of products, from basic clothing to high-end luxury items, and it was also a valuable trade commodity.
This high demand, combined with limited production methods, made linen a precious resource, and as a result, laws were created to ensure that it was conserved and used only for the most important purposes. Scarcity of Linen as a burial material was seen as a luxury, and its use in this context was often restricted or banned to preserve the precious resource for other, more pressing needs.
To learn more about scarcity of linen, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13590676
#SPJ4
abby gets a state court civil judgment against casey, but casey does not pay. which of the following is one of the tools available to abby to enforce the judgment against casey?
Writ of Execution is is one of the tools available to Abby to enforce the judgment against Casey.
A writ of execution is a court order that authorises law enforcement officials to start transferring property as the result of a legal decision. It makes a judgement of possession effective. Assets, cash, and real estate are all examples of property. An official document issued by a court that establishes ownership rights is known as a judgement of possession. The judge may then issue a writ of execution to start the property transfer when the court issues a judgement of possession. The writ of execution actually starts the transfer procedure from a judgement debtor to a plaintiff; the judgement for possession just declares the plaintiff has a claim to the property.
Learn more about writ of execution here:
https://brainly.com/question/15836478
#SPJ4
T/F the power of the federal government to completely regulate an activity, to the exclusion of any state regulation, is the power of occlusion.
True,the power of the federal government to completely regulate an activity, to the exclusion of any state regulation, is the power of occlusion.
The United States federal government (U.S. federal government or U.S. government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic primarily located in North America, consisting of 50 states, a city within a federal district (the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, where the majority of the federal government is based), five major self-governing territories, and several island possessions.
The federal government, also known as Washington, is divided into three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.
Learn more about federal government
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
Are voter ID laws racist? Why or why not?
Is critical race theory racist? Why or why not?
Please answer each question truthfully and to the best of your ability.
Please use facts to back up your answers.
Answer:
Explanation:
I do not have personal beliefs. I can provide information based on facts and expert opinions to help you understand the topics better.
Voter ID Laws:
There is ongoing debate and disagreement about the impact of voter ID laws on different racial groups. Proponents of voter ID laws argue that they are necessary to prevent election fraud and ensure the integrity of the voting process. Critics, however, argue that these laws can create barriers for some people, particularly those from communities of color, to exercise their right to vote. The impact of these laws can vary depending on the specifics of the law, the resources available to voters, and the implementation of the law.
Critical Race Theory:
Critical race theory is an intellectual movement and framework for examining the ways in which race and racism intersect with other forms of oppression and power. It seeks to understand how laws and legal institutions have contributed to and perpetuated systemic racial inequality. Some individuals and groups have criticized critical race theory as promoting reverse racism and being divisive, while others see it as a necessary tool for understanding and combating the impacts of systemic racism in society.
It is important to note that the interpretation and application of critical race theory can vary, and the term can mean different things to different people. However, it is generally seen as a tool for examining and challenging the ways in which race and racism continue to shape society and the legal system, rather than a statement about the inherent characteristics of any particular race or group of people.
_____________________________________________________
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
TRUE OR FALSE the town of somerset passed a law forbidding parking on main street between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. this is an example of an ordinance
True. The municipality of Somerset approved a law making it illegal to park on Main Street from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. An illustration of an ordinance is this.
Res judicata status can only be granted to decisions made by the US Supreme Court. If a legislation governs the matter, the court will not make its decision using common law. An illustration of an ordinance is this. Private law includes criminal law as a subclass. Another word for "controlling precedent" is dicta. It is best practise to specify in an agreement which state statute will apply to disagreements resulting from the agreement. Transcribed of the parliamentary hearing and discussions that took place before a law was passed are frequently used by courts to assess the intent and application of a legislation.
Learn more about ordinance
https://brainly.com/question/13944560
#SPJ4
True. The municipality of Somerset approved a law making it illegal to park on Main Street from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. An illustration of an ordinance is this.
Res judicata status can only be granted to decisions made by the US Supreme Court. If a legislation governs the matter, the court will not make its decision using common law. An illustration of an ordinance is this. Private law includes criminal law as a subclass. Another word for "controlling precedent" is dicta. It is best practise to specify in an agreement which state statute will apply to disagreements resulting from the agreement. Transcribed of the parliamentary hearing and discussions that took place before a law was passed are frequently used by courts to assess the intent and application of a legislation.
Learn more about ordinance
https://brainly.com/question/13944560
#SPJ4
whether the Supreme Court has no role in constitutional revision
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to initiate a constitutional revision. This power lies with the legislative branch through the process of amending the Constitution.
It typically requires the approval of two-thirds of both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states. However, the Supreme Court plays a role in interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws, including any amendments to the Constitution.
The process of amending the U.S. Constitution is complex and requires a significant level of agreement across the country. The Constitution outlines the procedures for making amendments in Article V, which requires two-thirds of both houses of Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) to approve a proposed amendment. Once Congress approves an amendment, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states, either through their legislatures or state-level conventions.
To learn more Supreme Court, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Which of the following riders is often used in business life insurance policies when the policy owner needs to change the insured under the policy?
answer choices
O Guaranteed insurability rider
O Payor benefit rider
O Substitute insured rider
O Term rider.
A assured insurability rider can be added to a life insurance coverage that offers you the option to extend the policy's dying gain to cover your altering needs. These can be applied at a specific time (3 or 5 years) or upon a unique existence match (marriage, children, new mortgage).
Who is the rider on a lifestyles insurance policy?A rider is an non-compulsory coverage or feature you can add to your existence insurance policy, often for an extra cost. Riders can help cowl life activities that your trendy coverage does not. Riders can supply advantages for integral illness and extra in the course of your lifetime.
Which of the following riders brought to a lifestyles insurance plan policy can pay section of the demise benefit?2. Accidental Death Rider. An unintentional death rider will pay out an additional amount of loss of life gain if the insured dies as the end result of an accident. Normally, the extra gain paid out on loss of life due to an accident is equivalent to the face quantity of the authentic policy, which doubles the benefit.
Learn more about life insurance policies here;
https://brainly.com/question/1373572
#SPJ4