Law providing incomplete answers result in the business culture becoming a determining factor in ethical decision making .
Option b is correct .
Ethical decision-making is not limited to big business decisions with dramatic social impact. Identify true statements about ethical decision-making in business. At some point, all workers face issues that require ethical decisions. Respect is an essential component of ethical responsibility. Ethical leaders treat everyone equally, from managers to employees. A lack of respect for those around you can quickly create a negative or hostile work environment.
As a result, these companies are building internal and external levels of trust for the benefit of internal and external stakeholders. Regarding business ethics, the following aspects should be considered.
To know more about ethical decision visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14890010
#SPJ4
The correct question is :
Which of the following situations could result in the business culture becoming a determining factor in ethical decision making?
a. Lack of competition
b. Law providing incomplete answers
c. Lack of strong leadership
d. Stagnant or decreasing profits
the empirical rule tells the approximate percentage of the data which falls into certain ranges. to which distributions does the empirical rule apply?
The empirical rule (also called the "68-95-99.7 rule") is a guideline for how records is allotted in a everyday distribution. The rule states that (approximately): - 68% of the statistics points will fall inside one wellknown deviation of the mean. - 95% of the facts points will fall within two fashionable deviations of the mean.
What distributions does the empirical rule practice to?The empirical rule applies to a regular distribution. In a regular distribution, truely all records falls within three general deviations of the mean. The mean, mode, and median are all equal. The suggest is the common of all of the numbers in the data set.
What does the empirical rule measure?The empirical rule, or the 68-95-99.7 rule, tells you where most of the values lie in a everyday distribution: Around 68% of values are within 1 general deviation of the mean. Around 95% of values are within 2 trendy deviations of the mean. Around 99.7% of values are within three widespread deviations of the mean.
Learn more about empirical rule apply here;
https://brainly.com/question/10093236
#SPJ4
although states make specific laws governing water rights and the rights in land that borders water, most states generally follow one of two basic doctrines regarding water rights. in many states, the common law doctrine of riparian and littoral rights dictates that water rights are automatically conveyed with property. in others, all water rights are controlled by the state under the doctrine of:
The prior appropriation model of water rights has its origins in several parts of the West. Its roots can be seen clearly in the needs of miners during the CaliforniaGold Rush.
Prior appropriation water rights are a concept in American law that states the first person to take a certain amount of water from a water source for "beneficial use" (agricultural, industrial, or domestic) has the right to keep using that amount of water for that purpose. If they don't violate the rights of earlier users, subsequent users are permitted to take the remaining water for their own use. Prior appropriation rights only grant the right to remove water; they do not grant full ownership of the water and can be revoked if not used for a long period of time.
To know more about law refer :
brainly.com/question/30451144
#SPJ4
A landowner sued a defendant for trespass and destruction of property. The defendant called a witness to testify that at the time of the alleged trespass, the defendant was with the witness miles away from the landowner's property. On cross-examination, the landowner asked the witness if he was the defendant's best friend.
Is this question proper?
A. No, because it is not relevant to the issue of whether the defendant trespassed on and destroyed the landowner's property.
B. No, because it exceeds the scope of the defendant's direct examination of the witness.
C. Yes, because character evidence is admissible in a civil action.
D. Yes, because it impeaches the witness's testimony.
No, because it is not relevant to the issue of whether the defendant trespassed on and destroyed the landowner's property.
In legal proceedings, a defendant is a person or thing who is the party either accused of committing a crime in a criminal prosecution or against whom some sort of civil redress is being sought in a civil action. Different legal systems use different terminology. In Scottish law, the terms "accused" or "panel" are used in place of these terms in criminal proceedings and "defender" in civil actions. The term "respondent" is also in use. In civil cases, defendants typically appear in court for the first time willingly in response to a summons. In the past, a writ of caspian ad responder allowed for the detention of civil defendants. Modern civil defendants who are represented by an attorney can typically avoid most court appearances.
Learn more about defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/3246553
#SPJ4
true/false. opponents of corporate social responsibility argue that when companies use their profits to promote social causes, they are not being fair to investors who provided the funds for the purpose of financial gain.
True. Opponents of corporate social responsibility argue that when companies use their profits to promote social causes, they are not being fair to investors who provided the funds for the purpose of financial gain.
These opponents believe that corporations should focus solely on maximizing profits and return on investment for their shareholders, and that using profits for social or environmental causes diverts resources away from this goal. They argue that companies have no social obligation beyond obeying the law and maximizing profits, and that investors should be free to decide for themselves which causes to support with their own money. On the other hand, proponents of corporate social responsibility argue that companies have a broader set of responsibilities beyond just maximizing profits and that corporations have the resources and influence to have a positive impact on society and the environment. They believe that companies that engage in socially responsible practices will ultimately benefit in the long term, through increased employee engagement and customer loyalty, improved reputation and brand image, and more resilient supply chains. Ultimately, the debate over corporate social responsibility reflects different perspectives on the role of business in society and the responsibilities of corporations beyond just maximizing profits.
to learn more about corporate social responsibility here:
https://brainly.com/question/13528806
#SPJ4
although the english government did not actively establish colonies by using royal expeditions, it still had major policy objectives relating to colonial governance. identify the major english governmental policy objectives.
True, while the English government did not actively establish colonies through royal expeditions, it still had major policy objectives relating to colonial governance. The following are some of the major policy objectives of the English government regarding its colonies:
Trade and commerce: One of the primary goals of the English government was to promote trade and commerce between England and its colonies. The government encouraged the development of colonial industries, such as agriculture and mining, to increase economic growth and generate revenue for the Crown. Revenue generation: The English government viewed its colonies as sources of revenue, and sought to maximize the economic benefits from its colonies by imposing taxes, tariffs, and other forms of revenue collection. Expansion of British influence: The English government saw its colonies as a means of extending British influence and power around the world. By establishing colonies and controlling their economies, the government aimed to increase its influence and power over other nations. Control and stability: The English government sought to exert control over its colonies in order to maintain stability and prevent uprisings or rebellions. This was accomplished through a combination of military force, economic policies, and political control. Protection of religious and cultural values: The English government also aimed to maintain the religious and cultural values of England in its colonies. It encouraged the establishment of the Church of England in its colonies, and sought to promote its values and beliefs.
To learn more about colonial governance here:
https://brainly.com/question/28800087
#SPJ4
arizona supreme court responds to kari lake’s 2nd election petition. state of true or false. 1. true
2. false
Arizona supreme court responds to kari lake’s 2nd election petition is state of true.
When should a petition for an election be submitted?-A petition may be filed by any candidate at the election, by any elector within 45 days after the date of the returned candidate's election, or if there are several returned candidates at the election. A petition may not be filed earlier than the day of the election for the returned candidate.(1) No election of a councillor may be challenged without an election petition submitted for decision to the District Court with jurisdiction within thirty days of the day the results of the election were published under section 32.Arizona supreme court responds to kari lake’s 2nd election petition.To learn more about election petition refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/7475875
#SPJ4
The reasonable person standard applies to which of the required elements to be proved in a negligence case? Choose 2 answer choices.
A. Breach of duty.
B. Proximate cause.
C. Causation in fact.
D. Damages.
E. Duty of care.
The necessary elements to prove in a claim of negligence are breach of duty and duty of care, to which the rational individual standard is applied.
What in a case is negligence?Any action or inaction that falls short of what a "reasonable person" would do.
What is a case study of negligence in court?A widow filed a lawsuit against the defendant underneath the Fatal Accidents Act of 1976 after learning of her husband's passing. The husband was a worker for the defendant, and due to negligence, he suffered a lip injury that contained pre-cancerous cells When someone acts recklessly or carelessly and injures or loses something to another, that person has engaged in negligence.
To know more about negligence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28903815
#SPJ4
the supreme expressions of the law at both federal and state levels of government...all other law is SUBORDINATE to fed. consitutional law.
A new hierarchy is established by the Supremacy Clause: federal legislation prevails regardless of the order in which it was enacted. However, this order is only significant if the two laws really conflict with one another.
What is a good illustration of a federal law?Laws pertaining to Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Federal anti-discrimination and civil rights legislation that guard against discrimination based on race, age, gender, and disability. Copyright and patent legislation. federal criminal statutes, such as those that prohibit tax fraud and money fraud.
Which of these is a federal statute?Federal laws are actions that have been given the go-ahead to become law by either the president or both chambers of Congress, have the president's signature, have overturned the president's veto, or in some other way. Individual decisions, sometimes referred to as laws,
To know more about federal law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ4
what is the difference between itemized and standard deductions?
A fixed amount of your income is subtracted from your income when you employ the standard deduction. while an itemized deduction includes a list of permitted costs. You may claim whatever substantially reduces your tax liability.
the standard deduction's purpose:The standard deduction reduces a taxpayer's taxable income. It guarantees that only households that earn more than a certain amount will be required to pay income tax. When filing their tax forms, taxpayers can claim a standard deduction.
What actions are covered under standard deductions?The amount of income subject to taxation is reduced by the standard deduction, which has a fixed dollar value. the sum of the baseline standard deduction and any older-person-specific extra standard deductions
To know more about standard deductions visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3158031
#SPJ4
nora is an independent contractor, who worked for a local construction company for a few months this year. which of these documents should she expect to receive from her employer before filing her taxes?
Nora should anticipate getting an Application 1099-MISC from her organization as an independent consultant before filing her taxes.
What is the purpose of the 1099-MISC form?Various types of compensation, such as rent, royalties, prizes, as well as awards, healthcare payments, as well as payments to attorneys, are reported using Form 1099-MISC.
Who is required to file Form 1099-MISC?Payments of at least $10 in royalty fees or broker payments in spite of the lack of dividends or income interest to some other person as well as at least $600 for certain rental payments, prizes and awards, as well as other listed income payments, as required by the IRS, must be filled out, submitted on Form documents, as well as a copy sent to the payee with the Internal Revenue Service. (IRS). The form must reach the recipient by the end of February.
To know more about Form 1099 visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28152994
#SPJ4
what is the term for a structure of government characterized by the division of powers between a national government and associated regional governments? pols2306 chapter 2
The term for a structure of government characterized by the division of powers between a national government and associated regional governments is federalism.
What is federalism?It a method of political organization that joins diverse states or other polities inside a larger political structure while allowing each to preserve its own integrity. Federal systems accomplish this by mandating that fundamental policies be decided upon and carried out after some sort of dialogue, allowing for the participation of all members in the decision-making process. All government may and typically do administer programs that directly benefit the individual citizen, and the people may and typically do elect representatives to all of them.
Learn more on government here:
brainly.com/question/30144373
#SPJ4
which of the following is a secondary source of law? multiple choice all of the answer choices are secondary sources of law. a model law passed as a guide to states in crafting their statutes on healthcare a constitutional interpretation of a statute by a federal court of appeals a regulation passed by a federal agency
A constitutional interpretation of a statute by a federal court of appeals is a secondary source of law.
Primary sources and secondary sources are the two main categories into which the materials utilised for legal research are often separated. Constitutions, judicial decisions, statutes, and administrative rules and regulations are examples of primary legal sources. Although secondary legal sources sometimes repeat the law, they also explore, examine, explain, and critique it. In order to find main legal sources, define legal terms, or conduct legal research, secondary sources are often used. To put it simply, anything that is not the actual legislation is referred to be a secondary source.
Learn more about secondary source of law here:
https://brainly.com/question/26410745
#SPJ4
in a state court, the party who is dissatisfied with a jury's verdict is most likely to file a posttrial motion with the judge seeking .
In a state court, the party who is dissatisfied with a jury's verdict is most likely to file a posttrial motion with the judge seeking . C. a judgment notwithstanding the verdict
A state court in the United States has jurisdiction over disputes involving a state. The vast majority of civil and criminal cases in the United States are handled by state courts; federal courts in the United States are far smaller in terms of both personnel and caseload, and handle different types of cases.
Because each state is "free to organize its courts as it sees fit," "no two states have identical court structures."
In general, state courts are common law courts that decide cases using their respective state laws and procedures.
Learn more about state court
https://brainly.com/question/30408538
#SPJ4
Full Question In a state court, the party who is dissatisfied with a jury's verdict is most likely to file a posttrial motion with the judge seeking _____.
A. a judgment as a matter of law
B. res judicata
C. a judgment notwithstanding the verdict
D. voir dire
E. peremptory challenge
What are three requirements for probable cause?
Answer:
United States, the U.S. Supreme Court defines probable cause as where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.
Explanation:
if you refuse to take a breathalyzer/blood test ..... within 10 years, your license will be suspended for two years.
Answer: Depends on the State
Explanation: Refusal to submit to a breathalyzer has varying consequences depending on the state you're in. For example, in Oregon it is an automatic suspension of your DL for at least one year. AND it is considered a crime in itself that carries a $500-1000 fine.
Because the Constitution could not list every possible situation the government may face, it provides for ______ powers.a. enumeratedb. impliedc. exclusived. concurrent
Such powers fall under the concurrent powers
What is concurrent powers?Concurrent powers are those of a federal state that are shared by the federal government and each of its constituent political bodies, such as a state or province. These powers may all be exercised simultaneously within the same area, with relation to the same individuals or group, and with regard to the same matter. Concurrent powers are contrasted with reserved powers, which the federal government lacks, and exclusive federal powers (forbidden to be possessed by the states, or requiring federal permission). In the event of a dispute, federal law may prevail over state or provincial law because it is the supreme law.
To learn more about concurrent powers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2459928
#SPJ4
conduct that is legal is ethically unquestionable.
a. true
b. false
False, conduct that is legal is ethically unquestionable.
What is Responsible Conduct of Research?The definition of responsible conduct of research (RCR) is "the practise of scientific exploration with integrity." It entails being aware of and using recognized professional norms and ethical principles in the conduct of all scientific research operations. Ethical and responsible research conduct is essential for scientific and engineering excellence as well as public trust. As a result, education in responsible and ethical research conduct is regarded as critical in the preparation of future scientists and engineers. The America COMPETES (Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science) Act of 2007 draws public attention to the importance of the national research community's long-term commitment and broader efforts to provide RCR training as an integral part of professional preparation and long-term success.
To know more about Conduct visit:
brainly.com/question/28608815
#SPJ4
evaluate the issues listed on the left. decide whether the issue is an argument for globalization or an argument against globalization and who or what is being affected by the issue. drag the issue to the appropriate column in the chart.
Producers
Arguments For Globalization: More markets to sell in-Arguments Against Globalization: Can go bankrupt due to competitionThe proponents argue that globalization creates a global market for companies to sell their products, giving them a huge opportunity to reach global customers and grow. The argument against it is that because companies all over the world are attempting to capitalize on the opportunity to be in the global market, any company attempting to enter a foreign market will face stiffer competition from other companies.
The Environment Arguments For Globalization: Tougher laws lead to lower pollution rates- Arguments Against Globalization: Lack of adequate regulation leads to abuseThe proponents argue that as countries become wealthier, they are more likely to enact stricter pollution-control regulations. The counterargument is that industrialized countries shift manufacturing operations to less developed countries with fewer resources.
ConsumersArguments For Globalization: More products to choose fromArguments Against Globalization: Don't know how products are madeThe argument is in favor because businesses can ship their products anywhere in the world, giving customers access to a wider range of options. The opposing argument is that because there are no international laws governing standardization, goods produced elsewhere may not be reliable or secure.
WorkersArguments For Globalization: Development of better skills
-Arguments Against Globalization: Loss of jobs due to competition
The proponents argue that workers now have access to better education and skill development, which could lead to higher pay. The argument against it is that joining a global market may result in job losses due to competitive factors.
Learn more about globalization
https://brainly.com/question/15283031
#SPJ4
Full Question :Many influential economists, politicians, and business leaders think that a shift toward a more integrated and interdependent global economy is a good thing. There is evidence to support the theory that falling barriers to international trade and investment drive the global economy toward greater prosperity. There are, however, critics who argue against globalization. Anecdotes, evidence, and arguments can be collected to support each side of the debate.
International businesses need to understand the nature of the globalization debate and observe how their own practices may act in support of or against globalization. Understanding how each side sees the issues can lead toward better solutions to the problems caused by globalization.
Evaluate the issues listed on the left. Decide whether the issue is an Argument For Globalization or an Argument Against Globalization and who or what is being affected by the issue. Drag the issue to the appropriate column in the chart.
1. Manufacturing jobs move to low wage countries.
2. Increased efficiency of the whole economy.
3. Lack of adequate regulations to protect the environment.
4. Economic power shifts from nations to international institutions.
5. Tougher environmental regulations follow economic progress.
6. Real power resides with nation-states.
7. The gap between the rich and the poor nations of the world has gotten wider.
8. Living standards improve.
A. Who or what is affected
1. Producers
2. The environment
3. Consumers
4. Workerd
B. Arguments For Globalization
C. Arguments Against Globalization
Which of the following provides notification to a criminal defendant in custody of the right to an attorney?
Miranda warning
First Amendment warning
arraignment
plea
Answer: Miranda Warning
Explanation: Your Miranda Warning includes your right to an attorney:
You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions.
If you give up the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the future.
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish.
If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present, you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney.
Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present?
in counseling, the segregation of science and practice is essential in order to maintain updated knowledge that practitioners can integrate in their clinical work.
The statement is not true segregation of science and practice is not essential for counceling.
What is counceling?The field of psychology known as counselling psychology is the branch of study that, includins the counselling process and its results, training, career development, health etc. Focusing on assets and strengths, person-environment connections, educational and vocational development, brief encounters, and a focus on intact personalities are some common threads among counselling psychologists.
Carl Rogers, who didn't have a medical degree and couldn't name his job psychotherapy, came up with the term "counselling" in America. Counseling psychology began in the United States around the time of World War II, like many other contemporary psychological specialities.
To learn more about psychology visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20387423
#SPJ4
what is the purpose of the community safety education act quizlet
By establishing a uniform standard for the training that Texas drivers and law enforcement personnel receive, the Community Safety Education Act (SB 30) aims to remedy this.
The Act requires uniform training in expected behaviors for high school students as well as those receiving driving education as well as driver safety instruction.
The Urban Bikeway Design Guide, published by the National Affiliation of City Transportation Officials, states that shared lane markings "should never be taken into account a substitute for bike lanes, cycle tracks, and perhaps other detachment treatments in which these types of facilities are still mostly warranted or space permits" (NACTO).
Tp know more about Community Safety Education Act
https://brainly.com/question/24215137
#SPJ4
possible remedies for a breach of contract include: compensatory damages. fines. incarceration. all of these. none of these.
The possible remedies for a breach of contract include: compensatory damages, fines, and in some cases, incarceration.
Compensatory damages are meant to compensate the non-breaching party for the losses they suffered due to the breach of contract. They are awarded to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been if the contract had been performed as agreed. Fines may also be imposed as a remedy for a breach of contract in some cases, especially if the breach involves a violation of law or regulation. Fines serve as a deterrent and a punishment for the breach. Incarceration is a more extreme remedy and is typically only used in cases where the breach of contract is also a criminal offense, such as fraud or embezzlement. It is important to note that not all of these remedies will be available in every case, and the remedy that is chosen will depend on the specific circumstances of the breach of contract.
To learn more about incarceration here:
https://brainly.com/question/30269092
#SPJ4
All of the following were evidence of state-level Progressivism EXCEPT:
a) Prohibition Laws
b) Direct Election
c) Abolition of child labor
d) Increased state spending on education
All of the following were evidence of state-level Progressivism except Prohibition Laws.
What is Prohibition Laws?It is illegal to make, store, transport, sell, possess, or consume alcoholic beverages, which is known as prohibition. Prohibition is the act or practice of restricting something by law. Production, importation, transportation, and sale of alcoholic beverages were all outlawed in the United States between 1920 and 1933 by a national constitutional statute. The 18th Amendment simply outlawed "the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors"; it did not prohibit their consumption. According to the law, any wine, beer, or spirits that Americans held in their houses as of January 1920 were theirs to keep and consume privately.Alcohol production and consumption were intended to be banned in the United States during Prohibition. The first state prohibition law was approved in Maine in 1846, and the Prohibition Party was founded in 1869. The drive for prohibition was predominantly a religious movement at the beginning of the 19th century.To learn more about Prohibition Laws refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27862866
#SPJ4
Agency rules are similar to statutes because of which one of the following? A) Congress must vote in favor of them to become effective. B) They are legal requirements and binding as if Congress has passed themC) They are enforced by law enforcement agenciesD) They are opinions regarding laws passed by Congress.
The ideal selection is B. As if passed by Congress, they are binding legal requirements.
What are the law's requirements?The term "requirements of law" refers to all requirements imposed by any government authority, including all laws, rulings, orders, proclamations, ordinances, rules, statutes, and case law.
What is an administrative requirement?A governing body's regulations and policies are referred to as regulatory requirements. These include rules for how businesses must conduct their operations, such as minimum wage laws, standards for various products the same as food safety and protection, and legislation to safeguard customers from monopolies or fraud. To enforce laws such as personal laws, contract laws, regulations laws, anti-prohibition laws, and others to control how people behave in accordance with social norms.
To know more about legal requirement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10248459
#SPJ4
what is the term for the increasing interdependence of citizens and nations across the world?
Globalisation is the word used to explain the growing interdependence of the worlds countries in terms of economy culture technology , human resource etc..
How does it globalization work?The driving force behind globalization, or globalisation as it is known in various parts of the world, is the merging of cultural and economic systems. This convergence encourages and, in some cases, even demands greater involvement, integration, and interdependence across states. Countries focus on the products and services where they can compete more successfully in a global market..Typically, this refers to what they can produce and offer most effectively,with the fewest resources and for less money than rival countries. Theoretically, if each nation focuses on what it does best, global production should be more efficient, prices should be cheaper, and economic growth should be universal.
To learn more about globalization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15283031
#SPJ4
which political party took control of louisiana at the end of reconstruction?
Following Reconstruction, the Democratic Party controlled all of the former slave states for at least two decades.
What principles does the Democratic Party uphold?The Democratic Party, which is typically associated with liberal, progressive, and left-leaning ideals, is represented by donkeys. Therefore, it is in favor of strong government support for American citizens as well as industry regulation. As a result, Democrats place a strong emphasis on social responsibility as one of their core beliefs.
What are the Democratic Party's four tenets?The party is in favor of a mixed economy and typically supports Social Security, increased minimum wages, a universal health care system, free public education, and subsidized housing. In order to promote economic growth and job creation, it also promotes investments in renewable energy and infrastructure development.
To know more about democratic party visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ4
create a working/non-working prototype to demonstrate construction of a u-tube manometer to measure pressure of water flowing through the tap in your dorm room sink. assuming that you are using
Materials: Clear plastic tubing (U-shaped), Water, Food coloring, Tape, Ruler, Graduated cylinder or measuring cup.
How can it be demonstrated?To make the water more noticeable, apply food coloring to a graduated cylinder or measuring cup before adding water.
Cut two lengths of transparent plastic tubing, each long enough to extend over the graduated cylinder or cup and reach the bottom of it.
Make a "U"-shaped connection between the two pieces of tubing, making care to tie them tightly.
Water should be added to the "U"-shaped tube, making care to fill it to the same level on both sides.
The "U"-shaped tube should have one end taped to the sink faucet and the other to a graduated cylinder or measuring cup.
The water levels in the tube, graduated cylinder, and measuring cup may be checked by turning on the faucet.
The pressure of the water flowing through the faucet is shown by the difference in water levels between the two sides of the "U"-shaped tube.
Measure the difference in water levels with a ruler and note the results.
To learn more about manometer visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/18354578
#SPJ4
A jury makes specific, written findings of fact in response to questions posed by the trial judge when a ______ is employed.
A jury makes specific, written findings of fact in response to questions posed by the trial judge when a special verdict is employed.
A special verdict is a type of verdict used in a trial where a jury is asked to make specific findings of fact in response to questions posed by the trial judge. The purpose of a special verdict is to provide the judge with clear and precise information about the facts that the jury has found to be true. The judge then uses this information to make legal rulings and determinations about the case.
In a special verdict, the trial judge will present the jury with a series of questions relating to the case's specific facts and issues. The jury is asked to answer each question and make specific findings based on the evidence presented during the trial. The answers to these questions are recorded in writing, and the special verdict is read in court.
To learn more about special verdict, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/21323232
#SPJ4
popular sentiment in 1787 ______ a unitary government.
In contrast to a federal state, a unitary state is a type of political organisation where the majority or all of the governing power is held by a single, central authority.
What does a majority mean?
More than half of a total refers to a plurality, which is the excess of a majority over the entire total. 3.: a group or political party with a disproportionate number of votes.
The OED and the majority of dictionaries both agree that the definition of most is something like "changing a plural count noun: the biggest number of; the majority of." So most means "the majority of," as Merriam-Webster explains plainly and directly.
Helping her takes up most of his time. Children adore ice cream in large numbers. His consultancy business provided the majority of his income.
Know more about power Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14379882
#SPJ4
The director of a company that produced organic products was being sued by the minority shareholders of the company for allegedly breaching his duty of care and unwisely investing corporate funds into an organic clothing venture. During the trial, the lawyer for the minority shareholders introduced evidence that the director had been accused of battery three years ago, although he was never charged or arrested for the crime. The director's lawyer made no objection. The director's lawyer then attempted to introduce evidence that the individual who accused the director of battery later retracted his accusation. The lawyer for the minority shareholders objected to the introduction of this evidence on the grounds of relevance. The court overruled the objection and allowed the testimony.
Did the court err by overruling this objection?
No, as removing any unjust prejudice required the inclusion of further evidence disproving the battery charge.
What is court error ?A jurisdictional error happens when a court incorrectly addresses a complaint or grievance without having the proper jurisdiction. By granting a writ of certiorari, the court or tribunal can be corrected if they committed a legal mistake. Corrections may be made by the Court at any time on its own initiative or at the request of any party for clerical or mathematical errors in judgments, decrees, or orders, or errors resulting therefrom from any unintentional slip or omission. An incorrect interpretation of the legal rules governing procedure, evidence, or the issues in dispute between the parties is referred to as a legal error.No, as removing any unjust prejudice required the inclusion of further evidence disproving the battery charge.To learn more about court error refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28837719
#SPJ4