The Correct option (A) (B) ;The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the United States' federal judiciary. It has final appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law.
It also has original jurisdiction over a limited number of cases, including "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party."
The court has the power of judicial review, which allows it to invalidate a statute for violating a constitutional provision. It can also overturn presidential directives if they violate the Constitution or statutory law.
Learn more about supreme court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Full question which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?
The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
the policy concerns of the population at large
the policy preferences of Congress
chris is planning to file a case against a local manufacturing plant. the manufacturing plant is placing illegal waste into its surrounding waters. chris has notified the residents of the town, all of whom have suffered from various health problems due to the activities of the plant. which of the following petition/motion should chris and the other residents file with the court?
Assume that the manufacturing facilities will make up the structure the corporation proposes to construct. The defendants requested a dismissal once their case was adequately brought out. Chris Koster, a general, and Robin Carnahan, a secretary of state.
What did "propose" actuBally mean?
Provide or recommend a possible path of action for others to consider.
Any decisions regarding spending should be put off until after the budget has been presented, in my opinion. He advised conducting business directly with the vendors. (with a verb) She advised staying away from the gathering.
a formal suggestion or plan, the act of making a suggestion, a proposal to carry out an action, a proposal to build more offices, a proposal to submit, take into account, accept, or reject a proposal, He was refused permission to implement the system update he proposed.
Know more about brought Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/598271
#SPJ4
which of the following situations could result in the business culture becoming a determining factor in ethical decision making? multiple choice lack of competition lack of strong leadership law providing incomplete answers stagnant or decreasing profits
Law providing incomplete answers result in the business culture becoming a determining factor in ethical decision making .
Option b is correct .
Ethical decision-making is not limited to big business decisions with dramatic social impact. Identify true statements about ethical decision-making in business. At some point, all workers face issues that require ethical decisions. Respect is an essential component of ethical responsibility. Ethical leaders treat everyone equally, from managers to employees. A lack of respect for those around you can quickly create a negative or hostile work environment.
As a result, these companies are building internal and external levels of trust for the benefit of internal and external stakeholders. Regarding business ethics, the following aspects should be considered.
To know more about ethical decision visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14890010
#SPJ4
The correct question is :
Which of the following situations could result in the business culture becoming a determining factor in ethical decision making?
a. Lack of competition
b. Law providing incomplete answers
c. Lack of strong leadership
d. Stagnant or decreasing profits
For which of the following crimes does the New Jersey Real Estate Commission have the power to promptly revoke the license of an agent awaiting trial?
A. Larceny
B. Kidnapping
C. Forgery
D. Possession of drugs
For Forgery does the New Jersey Real Estate Commission have the power to promptly revoke the license of an agent awaiting trial
What is forgery under IPC?Making a false document under the name of a fictional character with the intent that it be believed that the document was created by a real person, or under the name of a deceased person with the intent that it be believed that the document was created by the person while he or she was still alive, may constitute forgery. Anyone found guilty of forgery faces a punishment of either type of jail for a time that may last up to two years, a fine, or a combination of the two. This clause states that anyone found guilty of forgery will be punished with a fine, either type of imprisonment for a time that may last up to two years, or both.To learn more about crimes refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
true/false. knowing the types of positive law is important to an understanding of the american legal system. attempts to provide us with a description that captures the general essence of law, rather than offering a simple list of different kinds of laws.
The statement "knowing the types of positive law is important to an understanding of the American legal system. Jurisprudence attempts to provide us with a description that captures the general essence of law, rather than offering a simple list of different kinds of laws is true because Positive Law theory is derived from the authorities who have enacted it.
It codifies people's core values. Courts are responsible for interpreting the meaning of the Constitution and the laws passed by Congress.
It is important to understand that America is governed by the rule of law adhering to the rule of law helps protect the rights of all people in a democratic society. The related words are "every man's rights". As reflected in our Declaration of Independence, the preamble to our Constitution, and Abraham Lincoln's immortal words at Gettysburg:
in the United States
To know more about Jurisprudence visit :
https://brainly.com/question/5482988
#SPJ4
assume that the vermont legislature passed a bill prohibiting the sale within the state of detergents containing certain chemicals harmful to the environment. assume further that the governor signed the bill into law. this law has the status of an .
Vermont legislature passed a bill prohibiting the sale within the state of detergents containing certain chemicals harmful to the environment. assume further that the governor signed the bill into law. this law has the status of an Statute .
The Vermont House of Representatives is the House of Representatives of the Vermont Legislature, the legislature of the state of Vermont, United States. The House of Representatives is made up of her 150 members, each representing approximately 4,100 citizens. The representative he is elected for a term of two years, there is no term limit.
Democrats are currently the dominant party in Vermont. With the exception of Republican Governor Phil Scott, the party has almost complete control of the state. The Vermont Legislature consists of two houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Based on population, there are all 30 senators representing 14 Senate districts and 150 senators representing 58 one-seat districts and 46 two-seat districts.
To know more about legislature visit :
https://brainly.com/question/530410
#SPJ4
The correct question is :
assume that the vermont legislature passed a bill prohibiting the sale within the state of detergents containing certain chemicals harmful to the environment. assume further that the governor signed the bill into law. this law has the status of an _____.
in following the eighth amendment, the supreme court has used which of the following tests to determine if an action constitutes cruel and unusual punishment?
The U.S. Supreme Court concluded in Wilson v. Seiter that a defendant claiming cruel and unusual punishment due to his prison circumstances must establish a culpable state of mind on the part of prison officials.
Does "concluded" imply "completed"?
to conclude a presentation, meeting, or writing: She reminded us of our obligation as she wrapped up her lecture. I want to thank you all for attending before I finish. An exuberant choir brought the event to a close. Synonyms, antonyms, and examples in a thesaurus.
When do we use the word conclude?
To conclude a speech with a verse from the Bible means to bring it to a close; to put an end to something. to state that after the speech, he said that the audience had been excellent. to come to a conclusion; resolve; or finally arrange: to conclude a pact.
know more about prison :
https://brainly.com/question/2663000
#SPJ4
amending an education record is an admission that the original entry was improper or that a person acted improperly. True or False?
False, such errors can come up in records due to human error and other factors and such amendment doesnot prove intentional falsehood.
What does amendment mean?If you amend something that has been written such as a law or any document, or something that is said, you change it in order to improve it or make it more accurate. Amending generalymeans to alter, modify, rephrase, or add to or subtract from (a motion, bill, constitution, etc.) by formal procedure and is most often associated with the law and the constitution. For example The country's(America) constitution was amended to allow women to vote in 1920, or the first amendment that clarified and upheld the seperation of church and state.
To learn more about amendments visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
which of the following statements is true of the supremacy clause? question 20 options: under this clause, it is immaterial that a state did not intend to frustrate the federal law if the state law in fact does so. this clause prohibits states from enacting laws that impact rights and duties of companies under the existing companies' contracts. under this clause, state laws decide the validity of the laws passed by congress. the application of this clause is traditionally limited by the district courts. this clause gives priority to u.s. laws when various laws are not consistent.
Under this clause, it is immaterial that a state did not intend to frustrate the federal law if the state law in fact does so.
Problems with the Articles of Confederation (the Articles), which ruled the United States from 1781 to 1789, prompted the creation of the Supremacy Clause. The absence of a similar clause stating federal law to be superior to state law in the Articles is notable. The Supreme Court used the Clause to create a significant role for the federal government in running the affairs of the country in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. In its early cases, the Court used the Clause to reach the conclusion that conflicting state laws were superseded by federal treaties and acts. The Supremacy Clause, according to Alexander Hamilton, limits Congress's authority. Inconsistent with the Constitution, a legislation approved by Congress "would not be the highest law of the land, but a usurpation of power not authorised".
To know more about clause refer :
brainly.com/question/13695242
#SPJ4
what was an unintended consequence of prohibition according to the video: check all that apply
An increase in violent crime is a side effect of prohibition.
To protect people and families from the "scourge of intoxication," Prohibition was put into place. But it also had unforeseen effects, such as an increase in organized crime linked to the illicit manufacturing and sale of alcohol, a rise in smuggling, and a decrease in tax revenue.
At the national level, Prohibition cost the federal government approximately $300 million to enforce and a total of $11 billion in lost tax income. The most significant result was that many states and the federal government started to rely on income tax collections going forward to fund their budgets.
To know more about Prohibition, refer to this link:
https://brainly.com/question/29620451
#SPJ4
andrew, an attorney, has a case that was recently heard by the united states court of appeals (8th circuit). andrew believes the case involves a significant issue of u.s. constitutional law. he would like to have the united states supreme court hear the case. one way by which the u.s. supreme court may review the case is by:
Writ of certiorari is one way by which the U.S. Supreme Court may review the case.
The writ of certiorari has its roots in the past several years, when it was first used to check verdicts for errors. It is the same in its contemporary incarnation. The higher authorities have consistently used it to overturn lesser authorities' judgements that contained legal errors or went beyond the scope of their authority. The provisions for the Supreme Court's and the High Courts' respective writ jurisdictions are found in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution. A writ is essentially a formal order given by a legal body with judicial or administrative jurisdiction.
Learn more about Writ of certiorari here:
https://brainly.com/question/13837196
#SPJ4
______, a tort theory, is used to recover damages as a result of printed defamation of character.
A. Slander
B. Embezzlement
C. Libel
D. Battery
E. Larceny
Libel, a tort theory, is used to recover damages as a result of printed defamation of character.
What is Libel?False remarks about a person, place, or thing are sent to a third party in the act of defamation, which harms the reputation of the target. It can be said or written. A tort or a felony is what it amounts to. Legal subcategories of defamation include libel and slander. Defamation through written words, images, or any other visual symbols in a print or electronic medium is generally referred to as libel. The verbal defamation known as slander. Libel is a form of defamation that involves the expression of false information through print, writing, images, signs, effigies, or any other physical form of communication that damages someone's reputation, exposes them to ridicule or public contempt, or causes them to lose business or suffer professional consequences.To learn more about Libel refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14634806
#SPJ4
an incident handler needs to preserve evidence for possible litigation. which of the following will the incident handler most likely do to preserve the evidence?
Procedures for managing incidents and preserving digital evidence. Whether collecting digital proof from a single or a number of sources.
Why does evidence actually matter?
Introduction. Real evidence is physical, observable evidence like a physical object, a recording on tape, a printed page from a computer, or a photograph. The court is able to independently assess this evidence.
Evidence is a thing or piece of knowledge put up to increase or decrease the likelihood that a fact exists. Testimony, written or verbal records, visual or audible images, recordings of voices, DNA tests, and other tangible artefacts can all be considered as evidence.
Strong evidence denotes that the advice took into account the existence of numerous pertinent and top-notch scientific research that came to comparable results regarding the efficacy of a certain course of treatment.
Know more about sources Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29771183
#SPJ4
The US constitution explicitly allows courts to review legislative and executive actions to determine whether they are constitutional. True or False
True. The US Constitution expressly grants courts the authority to examine legislative and executive behavior to ascertain their constitutionality. Judicial review is the name for this authority.
What does US Constitution actually mean, in plain English?The three main branches of the federal government are described in the Constitution along with their respective duties. It also outlines the fundamental principles governing the US federal government. It has come to stand for Western legal precedent and is the oldest continuously in force governmental constitution.
What distinguishes the US Constitution as important?Establishing a government with enough power to act on a governmental level without jeopardizing fundamental rights was one of the main objectives of the Rights and Freedoms Charter as it was written by the General Assembly.
To know more about US Constitution visit:
brainly.com/question/28824274
#SPJ4
__________ is that information that is both legally and ethically available, but only from specialized channels or through direct local access.
Specialized information is that information that is both legally and ethically available, but only from specialized channels or through direct local access. Specialized information is defined as data or information that is ethically and legally permissible to possess but can only be acquired through particular routes or by direct local access.
The general public often does not have easy access to this information, and obtaining it may call for specialist knowledge or contacts. Industry-specific data, specialist market research studies, trade periodicals, expert witness evidence, and other sources that are only accessible through specialized channels or direct local access are examples of specialized information.
To learn more about information:
brainly.com/question/28096206
#SPJ4
why did the transfer of the louisiana territory from spain to france worry president jefferson?
Thomas Jefferson, the president, was concerned that French control of the Mississippi River may cut off a crucial trade route to the American West.
What has made Thomas Jefferson so renowned?Thomas Jefferson was a founding father of the United States, the primary author of the Declaration of Independence (1776), and the third President of the country. He was a champion of democracy (1801–1809).
What illness did Thomas Jefferson have?The third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, suffered from a variety of ailments on a regular basis, including episodic headaches, dysentery, rheumatism, several bone fractures, malaria, potentially TB, dental issues, diabetes, and urinary tract blockage.
To know more about Thomas Jefferson visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30346490
#SPJ4
which of the following statements characterizes the professionalization movement of police reform through the 1960s? question 10 options: the reformers sought to define policing as a profession. the reformers argued in favor of hiring qualified chief executives. the reformers sought to reduce the influence of politics on policing. all of the above
Using the Five I's of Police Professionalism for Front-Line Leaders paradigm, police leaders can assess their own moral integrity and improvement. Integrity, intelligence, initiative, industry, and effect are the main characteristics of the model's personality.
What are some professionalism examples?
The adjective professionalism is frequently used to refer to the behaviour you would anticipate from a professional. As an illustration, being on time for work and concentrating on the job at hand. And unless you're a professional wrestler, refrain from engaging in office brawls. examples of professionalism
What does professionalism mean?
Being professional is acting with responsibility, integrity, accountability, and excellence rather than by donning a suit and carrying a briefcase. It involves being productive at all times and communicating responsibly and effectively.
know more about industry:
https://brainly.com/question/28495859
#SPJ4
what kinds of powers are defined by the fact that they are granted to the national government but not denied to the states?
The United States Constitution grants the national government certain authorities, which are referred to as delegated powers.
How are powers granted to others managed?The Parliament and the judiciary have oversight over delegated legislation. Overall, the delegated powers created by a Bill are taken into consideration by statutory committees, which are under the supervision of the Parliament. Legislative instruments can become statutory instruments in one of two ways by using the negative resolution method.
What does "delegated power" mean?According to U.S. constitutional law, delegation of powers refers to the transfer of a specific power from one of the three parts of government—executive, legislative, and judicial—to another or to a separate organization.
To know more about delegated powers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/105180
#SPJ4
When a state law conflicts with federal law, ______ adjudicates.
a. the Supreme Court
b. the United Nations
c. the president
d. Congress
With the exception of disagreements between state and federal law, which may be appealed to the United States Supreme Court, the Supreme Court's ruling is final once it has been made.
What is a good illustration of a federal law?
Laws pertaining to Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Federal anti-discrimination and civil rights laws that guard against discrimination based on race, age, gender, and disability. Copyright and patent legislation. federal criminal statutes, such as those that prohibit tax fraud and money fraud.
Federal also refers to being associated with or belonging to the federal country's national government as opposed to one of its states.
U.S. law (Legal Definition), a body of law made up of a constitution, adopted laws, and the court rulings that have been made in relation to those laws.
Know more about Supreme Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Most states have laws requiring Drivers to be financially responsible so drivers can pay for:(a) vehicle repairs caused by their own negligence(b) vehicle loans needed to replace their damaged vehicle(c) fuel to get them to their destination safely(d) property damage and injuries they cause to other people(d) property damage and injuries they cause to other people
States have laws regarding the vehicle owner being financially responsible so that they can take care of property damage and injuries they cause to other people. (option d. )
What is property damage?When your property is destroyed or damaged, there has been property damage. Due to the damage it receives, the property loses some of its monetary worth and/or functionality. Body injury is separate from property harm. When you or someone else sustains a physical harm, that is a bodily injury. The same occurrence frequently results in both personal harm and property damage. For instance, a car accident may result in both physical harm to you and damage to your vehicle. People have legal protections that prevent them from having their property damaged because the things they own have both financial and emotional value.
To learn more about property damage visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3495879
#SPJ4
word: police according to the associated press, louisiana police allegedly stopped a 10-year-old boy who authorities say was driving recklessly.
According to the Associated Press, Louisiana police allegedly stopped a 10-year-old BOY who authorities say was driving recklessly. C) direct object.
What is direct object?The description "who authorities say was driving recklessly" is not a grammatical function such as subject, appositive, direct object, object of the preposition, etc. It's just a clause that provides additional information about the antecedent "a 10-year-old boy."
In this case, "who authorities say was driving recklessly" acts as an adjective clause modifying the noun "a 10-year-old boy." Hence the boy is a direct object.
Learn more about direct object form
https://brainly.com/question/1286640
#SPJ1
See full question below
According to the Associated Press, Louisiana police allegedly stopped a 10-year-old BOY who authoritiessay was driving recklessly.A) SubjectB) Appositive C) direct object. ...F) Object of the prepositionG) None of the above
An insurer goes bankrupt and is unable to pay on any of its insureds' claims. Which of the following will happen?
A. The insureds will not be paid.
B. The claims will be paid by a nationally-based program.
C. The claims will be paid by the state Life and Health Guaranty Association.
D. The claims will be paid by the state Department of Insurance.
The insurer's claims will be paid by the state Life and Health Guaranty Association.
When insurers breach contractual obligations because of financial impairment, the New Jersey Life and Health Guaranty Association was established to safeguard policyowners, reinsurer, and recipients under life insurance policies, health insurances, annuity contracts, and supplemental contracts. The entity accepting the risk and promising to cover losses that occur during the policy period is known as the insurer, often known as a "insurance business." For regular premium payments, the insurer agrees to cover losses. The insurer is one of the parties who agrees to cover potential financial losses that may result from a calamity in an insurance contract. The insurance provider is able to cover the losses incurred by the insured.
Learn more about insurance here:
https://brainly.com/question/989296
#SPJ4
A defendant charged with conspiracy to commit murder requested a meeting with the prosecutor to discuss the defendant's cooperation. At the beginning of this pre-trial meeting, the prosecutor indicated that she would talk with the defendant only if the defendant agreed that statements made by the defendant during the meeting could be used to impeach the defendant's testimony if a plea deal could not be reached and the defendant chose to testify at trial. The defendant, after consulting with his attorney, knowingly and voluntarily agreed. No plea agreement was subsequently reached. At trial, the defendant testified. When the prosecutor attempted to impeach the defendant's testimony with statements that the defendant had made during the pre-trial meeting, the defendant's attorney objected. Should the court permit the prosecutor to ask the defendant about such statements?
Yes, The court should permit the prosecutor to ask the defendant about such statements.
Yes, as a result of the defendant's conscious and voluntary waiver of his right to have words he made during a plea agreement deleted. Federal Rule 410 prohibits the admission of statements made by defendants during plea discussions, although the defendant has the option of forgoing this protection. In this instance, the defendant renounced this exception voluntarily, consciously, and in the presence of counsel. A person who is being tried in court on charges of breaching the law is known as a defendant.
Learn more about defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/12441773
#SPJ4
o'connor represents the defendant in a lawsuit. she just discovered that the plaintiff failed to file the lawsuit in the correct jurisdiction. this was during the discovery process of litigation. o'connor should make a motion for
O'Connor should make a motion to dismiss.
The intent to totally dismiss all allegations or the particular case is expressed in a motion for dismissal. This is carried out when there is insufficient evidence or when the provided facts do not amount to a crime. On the grounds that the plaintiff has not presented a claim that is legally sufficient or that the action was filed in the incorrect county, a legal move to dismiss a case before trial is submitted.
O'Connor can argue that the plaintiff did not file the complaint in the appropriate court's jurisdiction in the aforementioned instance, and as a result, the case ought to be dismissed. O'Connor's argument is based on an administrative matter, the inappropriate jurisdiction, not the case's facts, so a motion to dismiss would be more appropriate.
Read more about the motion to dismiss on:
https://brainly.com/question/14787121
#SPJ4
the supreme court has no role in constitutional revision. True/False ?
Answer: False
Explanation:
Constitutional revision can come in different forms. The Supreme Court has a key role in constitutional revision through the power of judicial review in which it interprets the Constitution as it reviews cases.
Put the items related to the evolution of privacy rights in order from oldest to most recent :1.The Supreme Court ruled that gays did not have a right to privacy.2.The Supreme Court expanded the right to privacy with regard to abortions.3.The Supreme Court ruled in favor of marital privacy.4.The Supreme Court ruled that gays have a right to privacy.
The laws about privacy rights were passed in this order 1) in favor of marital privacy 2) for abortion privacy 3) against privacy of gay people 4) for privacy of gay people.
What is the right to privacy?The right to privacy is a component of many legal systems that aims to prevent governmental and private actions that endanger people's privacy. The right to privacy is protected by more than 150 country constitutions. Although the right to privacy is not specifically mentioned in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which was originally drafted to guarantee individual rights to everyone everywhere, many interpret this through Article 12, which reads: "Nobody shall be the target of willful intrusion into their personal space, those of their loved ones, their homes, or their correspondence, or of attacks on their reputation or honour. Everyone has a right to legal protection from these types of intrusions or assaults."
To learn more about rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11254636
#SPJ4
occurs when a news story focuses on isolated details or specifics rather than looking broadly at a whole issue. group of answer choices thematic framing episodic framing a higher sense of political efficacy an elevated sense of personal confidence
Self-esteem is a feeling of personal value. How we see and feel about ourselves affects our level of self-esteem. It is predicated on our self-perceptions, which may be challenging to alter.
This is a another name for confidence. Depending on how much you regard yourself as a person, you might: Like and respect yourself. Self-esteem is the belief in one's own value or skills. The concept of self-esteem includes perceptions of oneself as well as emotional states including joy, sorrow, pride, and shame.
The conviction in one's own abilities or worth is known as self-esteem. In addition to self-perceived realities, self-esteem also encompasses sentiments of triumph, desperation, pride, and shame. Self-esteem is developed when we learn to accept our shortcomings while still making the decision to appreciate ourselves.
For such more question on Self-esteem.
https://brainly.com/question/8992294
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. advocates of the___perspective believe that much of behavior is motivated by inner forces, memories, and conflicts of which a person has little awareness or control.
Advocates of the psychodynamic perspective believe that much of behavior is motivated by inner forces, memories, and conflicts of which a person has little awareness or control
In its broadest sense, psychodynamics, also known as psychodynamic psychology, is a psychological approach that emphasizes the systematic study of the psychological forces underlying human behavior, feelings, and emotions and how they may relate to early experience. It is particularly interested in the dynamic relationships between conscious and unconscious motivation.
The term psychodynamics can also refer to the psychoanalytical approach pioneered by Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) and his followers.
Learn more about psychodynamic
https://brainly.com/question/10373312
#SPJ4
persuasion that occurs when audience members critically examine evidence and arguments occurs through the ________ persuasion route.
Persuasion occurs when audience members critically examine evidence and arguments through the Central route persuasion route.
The central route to persuasion refers to a process of evaluating arguments and evidence in a systematic and thoughtful manner. This process is more likely to occur when the audience is highly involved in the topic and is motivated to understand it deeply.
When people engage in the central route to persuasion, they are more likely to critically analyze the arguments and evidence presented to them, consider alternative perspectives, and come to a well-informed decision based on their own evaluation of the information. As a result, this route is often seen as more effective and longer-lasting than the peripheral route, which relies on surface-level cues and heuristics to influence attitudes and behaviors.
The central route to persuasion is more effective in situations where people are motivated to make informed decisions, while the peripheral route may be more effective when people have low involvement or are short on time.
To learn more about central route, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/28043860
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. under the doctrine of comparative negligence only the defendants negligence is tkaen into consideration
FALSE. under the doctrine of comparative negligence only the defendants negligence is taken into consideration
What is the distinction between contributory negligence and comparative negligence ?When an injured celebration is in any way negligent for the accident they suffered, they can't get better damages. On the contrary, beneath comparative negligence, a plaintiff may also still recover damages. However, damages are typically reduced by way of the percentage of the plaintiff's fault.
Comparative Negligence Defined as?Plaintiff is not barred from recovery by way of his contributory negligence, however his healing is decreased by way of a percentage equal to the ratio between his personal negligence and whole negligence.
To know more about comparative negligence visit;
brainly.com/question/28535877
#SPJ4
Sofia works in the advertising department of Energy First, a company that manufactures a vitamin supplement that allegedly boosts a person’s energy level. Sofia creates an advertisement for the product that states that Energy First has been clinically proven to boost energy levels when she knows that no such study has occurred. Can the government prevent Sofia from making such claims in her advertisements?
a. Yes, commercial speech is even more protected under the First Amendment than individual speech.
b. Yes, the government has a substantial interest in protecting the health of the public, and the restriction on these claims advances that interest without going any further than necessary.
c. No, the government cannot because in doing so, the government goes too far in restricting free speech.
d. No, the government cannot regulate free speech.
Yes, this same government has a significant interest in safeguarding the public's health, and the limitation on these claims furthers that entertain without going overboard.
What does government mean in plain English?A government is the governing structure of a state or community. According to the Columbia Encyclopedia, government is "a technique of social control where right to make laws and indeed the right to incorporate them is vested in such a special segment of society."
What does the government do?A government is an institution where laws can be passed and carried out by elected officials. The fundamental responsibilities of an authorities include practicing leadership, maintaining law and order, providing public services, and ensuring economic, national, and social security.
To know more about government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3710023
#SPJ4