The police use too much force for the investigatory, They can use excessive force for the arrest.
What is investigated?A detective's work is investigation. Private investigators conduct investigations. The criminal investigation is the study of facts needed to identify, locate, and prove the guilt of an accused criminal. An investigation is a thorough search for facts, particularly those that are hidden or must be.
A police officer uses the to much force for an Arrest or any illegal activity is been performed, There are some rights given to police officers for the investigation,
Therefore, As a result, police officers use their power for criminal activity, and investigation.
Learn more about investigatory here:
https://brainly.com/question/1191670
#SPJ1
does the peremptory challenge damage the fairness of the jury system? Why does it result in increased us of the death penalty?
Yes, the peremptory challenge damage the fairness of the jury system. The peremptory challenges have been used to exclude members of minority groups, particularly African Americans, from juries in criminal cases, particularly in death penalty cases.
What is the peremptory challenge?The peremptory challenge was known as a tool in jury selection that enables lawyers to excuse jurors without a reason for doing so..
The use of peremptory challenges has been criticized as damaging to the fairness of the jury system, based on the fact that it can result in the exclusion of jurors based on racial, ethnic, or other biases, rather than on their qualifications or ability to be impartial.
Therefore yes the peremptory challenge damage the fairness of the jury system.
Learn more about peremptory challenge here:https://brainly.com/question/30362467
#SPJ1
which of the following monetary policy actions by the federal reserve would result in an appreciation of the united states dollar? a) An open-market sale of government bonds. b) A discount rate decrease. c) A required reserve ratio reduction. d) A sale of government bonds. e) A purchase of government bonds
An open-market sale of government bonds by the federal reserve would result in an appreciation of the united states dollar
The central bank of the United States is the Federal Reserve, also referred to as the Fed. They are the only ones authorised to issue US currency and they regulate all US institutions. For the American government, their primary responsibility is to implement monetary policy.
The amount of money in circulation really rises when the Federal Reserve sells government bonds on the open market. This increase in the availability of money has the potential to cause inflation, which normally lowers the value of the currency. The Federal Reserve might also increase interest rates to counteract this effect, which could boost demand for the currency and cause it to appreciate.
Read more about the federal reserve on:
https://brainly.com/question/25817380
#SPJ4
true/false. no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states drafting history
According to this understanding, diminishing a citizen's private law privileges or immunities in comparison to those of other citizens constitutes limiting their private law rights.
What does privilege mean in its entirety?
a privilege, immunity, or distinctive advantage bestowed as a right or favour: prerogative. especially: such an immunity or right connected exclusively to a job or an office. privilege.
The term "personal privilege" refers to an urgent motion to raise a question of privilege that affects a right or privilege of the Council, Committee, or of a particular member.
He was raised in a highly wealthy environment. Wealthy and aristocratic individuals are drawn to the place. A special position of trust belongs to the advisor to the president. She was granted exclusive access to the files.
Know more about comparison Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1516829
#SPJ4
How does a political action committee influence the United States government?
A political action committee (PAC) is a type of 527 organization that raises money for campaigns for or against candidates by pooling member donations.
What is the main objective of a political action committee?In the US, a political action committee (PAC) is a 527 organization that collects member campaign contributions and distributes those funds to campaigns in support of or opposition to candidates for office, laws, or ballot initiatives. The legal term PAC was created in an effort to control campaign financing in the US.
Who formed a political action group?Independent committees, usually referred to as leadership PACs, are commonly formed by members of Congress and other political personalities. Leadership PACs often support candidates for a variety of federal and nonfederal positions.
To know more about political action committee visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29615436
#SPJ4
Tort is a French word meaning ______. Wrong.
Tort, which derives from the Anglo-French language, is defined as "wrong" or "a unlawful conduct." A tort is a civil wrong or injury that happens when one party violates a duty owed to another party, leading to harm or damage, according to legal definitions.
What is Anglo-French language?Old French and Old English were blended to create Anglo-French, which was used by the aristocracy in England from the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066 until the late 14th century. This language, which was also known as "Anglo-Norman French," was used for administration, law, and literature. It had a big impact on how the English language evolved. An original Middle English dialect that included Old French, Old Norse, and Old English finally emerged as a result of the Anglo-French language's long-term evolution and alteration. The many French loanwords and idioms in contemporary English are evidence of the Anglo-French heritage.
To learn more about Anglo-French visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/21601112
#SPJ4
For instance, imagine that a bank robber enters a bank, robs the bank, and kills a few people. This offender was unmasked and was caught on camera committing the crime. Under the theory of crime control model, what can be the actions taken considering the above scenario.
1. Immediate apprehension of the offender: The police should immediately apprehend the offender and bring him to justice.
2. Deterrents: The police should also implement deterrents to discourage similar criminal acts, such as increased surveillance and security measures in the bank and the surrounding area.
What are Deterrence techniques?3. Deterrence techniques: The police should also use deterrence techniques such as the death penalty or life imprisonment to discourage further criminal acts.
4. Increased public awareness: The police should also increase public awareness of the crime and the consequences of committing similar criminal acts.
5. Victim support: The police should also provide support to the victims of the crime, such as financial compensation, counseling, and medical treatment.
6. Education and prevention: Finally, the police should educate the public on the risks of committing similar criminal acts and provide prevention strategies to reduce the likelihood of similar criminal acts occurring in the future.
Read more about Deterrence techniques
https://brainly.com/question/14904611
#SPJ1
g a judge must be present during depositions to resolve disputes and ensure fairness. group startstrue or false
False. During depositions, a judge is not need to be present. Depositions are often made in a less formal environment, outside of the courtroom, where a judge is not needed to be present.
What are depositions?A witness or a party to a case may be formally interviewed during a deposition, which is conducted under oath in front of a court reporter or videographer. They are used to acquire data and proof during the discovery phase of a case. When a witness cannot testify in person, depositions are used to gather testimony that may be utilised in court.
They can also be used to clarify the evidence of a witness who will be testifying in person. Depositions can be recorded online or in person and are often conducted in a less formal environment outside of the courtroom. They are carried out by attorneys and can be used to establish facts, elucidate evidence, and cast doubt on a witness.
To know more about Depositions visit
brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ4
A petitioner challenges a certain law in the courts, saying the law causes unfair discrimination. Which question would a judge use to examine this law?
Is the petitioner related to anyone who works with a government agency?
Is the petitioner looking to place blame elsewhere for their own flaws?
Is the law necessary, or does it reflect a government preference?
Is the law current, or is it outdated because society has changed?
A petitioner challenges a certain law in the courts, saying the law causes unfair discrimination, so the question a judge would ask is: is the law necessary, or does it reflect a government preference? That is the third question.
What is the importance of the question for judges?The significance of the question is very high, as it helps the judge determine whether the law serves a legitimate government interest or not. To protect the constitution, the questions and answers are discussed in the courtroom.
Hence, a petitioner challenges a certain law in the courts, saying the law causes unfair discrimination, so the question a judge would ask is: is the law necessary, or does it reflect a government preference? That is the third question.
Learn more about the question for judges here.
https://brainly.com/question/28044605
#SPJ1
What are the powers of judicial review?
A judicial review is a review of a selection that has been made via an administrative tribunal or an administrative selection maker. A Supreme Court Justice decides whether or not the tribunal or decision maker had the authority to make the decision it did. It is not an appeal.
What is an example of the strength of judicial review?For example if Congress have been to omit a regulation banning newspapers from printing facts about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is consequently unconstitutional.
What is the energy of judicial assessment quizlet?Judicial assessment is the strength of the courts to decide whether or not legal guidelines and moves of the government are allowed under the Constitution. When a courtroom decides they are no longer allowed, it orders that the regulation or motion be viewed null and void.
Learn more about powers of judicial review here;
https://brainly.com/question/2488737
#SPJ4
after a defendant was convicted by a jury of domestic violence, the defense attorney briefly discussed the case with a juror. the defense attorney learned the following information from the juror: (1) the juror learned from a court clerk that the defendant had been acquitted of domestic violence a year ago when t
A juror may give testimony following a trial regarding unrelated, potentially damaging information that was presented to his attention but was not included. A petition for just a new trial would be supported by such information.
A defence attorney is indeed an advocate for the guilty and is in charge of defending their client's interests whether they are working with criminal or civil issues. A petition for just a new trial would be supported by such information. When people or businesses are hauled before such a court as that of the defendant, a judgement could be rendered against them. Putting together a strong defence and creating a winning plan for their clients are the duties of a criminal defence lawyer. A juror may give testimony following a trial regarding unrelated, potentially damaging information that was presented to his attention but was not included.He must organise, file, or argue on behalf of the accused in his capacity as their advocate. A lawyer's duties include negotiating a plea deal with the prosecution.
(After a defendant was convicted by a jury of domestic violence, the defense attorney briefly discussed the case with a juror. The defense attorney learned the following information from the juror: (1) The juror learned from a court clerk that the defendant had been acquitted of domestic violence a year ago when the victim recanted her story. (2) The jury misunderstood the judge's instruction regarding the standard of proof to apply in the case. (3) The juror relied heavily on testimony that the judge had stricken from the record. (4) The juror's child was ill and the juror only agreed to the verdict because he wanted to go home.
Which of the above pieces of information would best support the defense attorney's motion for a new trial?)
Learn more about juror
https://brainly.com/question/27035549
#SPJ4
which of the following scenarios best explains the inclusion of title ix as part of the education amendments of 1972 ?
In response to societal movements aiming to alleviate inequalities in women's educational opportunities, members of Congress inserted the amendment to the law title.
The Education Amendments of 1972, which included Title IX, were passed in response to demands from the general public for more equality. Which of the following effects of Title IX has been the most notable A rise in female involvement in high school and college sports The Education Amendments Act of 1972's Title IX. No one in the United States may be denied access to, barred from participation in, or subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity that receives financial support from the federal government, according to Title IX. A constituent contacts a congresswoman to urge her to cast her ballot. On a bill, yes. This rule, which is frequently referred to as simply Title IX, forbids gender discrimination in educational settings at any institution receiving federal funding. Although it is most famous for its impact on athletics, it also outlaws all forms of gender discrimination in the classroom.
Learn more about title here :
https://brainly.com/question/12983455
#SPJ4
True or False: there should always be two officials on the side of the court where the ball is being inbounded
True : there should always be two officials on the side of the court where the ball is being inbounded
Any person or entity, typically a government organisation, with the authority to resolve legal disputes between parties and deliver justice in civil, criminal, and administrative cases in accordance with the law is referred to as a court.In both common law and civil law legal systems, it is widely acknowledged that everyone has the right to assert their legal rights in court. In both of these systems, courts serve as the primary forum for conflict settlement. Similar to this, a criminal defendant has the right to defend themselves in court.The system of courts known as the judiciary decides how the law should be understood and applied. The place where a court meets is known as a venue. the location of court
Learn more about court :
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
under the u.s. constitution, which of the following sets of powers are associated with the national government rather than state governments?
Option (A) Implied & enumerated sets of powers are associated with the national government rather than state governments.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America. In 1789, it replaced the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution. It originally consisted of seven articles that defined the national framework and government constraints.
Its first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, which states that the federal government is divided into three branches: legislative (the bicameral Congress) (Article I); executive (the president and subordinate officers) (Article II); and judicial (the Supreme Court and other federal courts) (Article III).
Learn more about u.s. constitution,
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
Full Question :under the u.s. constitution, which of the following sets of powers are associated with the national government rather than state governments?
Implied & enumerated
raising armies
waging war
printing money
T/F the supreme court has no role in constitutional revision.
Answer: FALSE
Explanation: Supreme Court has a pretty key role in Constitutional Revision. They have the power of judicial review, in which they are charged with interpretation of the Constitution.
suppose a new law made it more difficult to stage a hostile takeover. which of the following groups would benefit the most? management
A new regulation that increases the difficulty of staging a hostile takeover would be most advantageous to management since it would lessen the likelihood that the company's management might be removed.
What is the role of management in a company?The general planning and coordination of a corporation is the responsibility of management. They make decisions that have an effect on the business' operations and finances as well as developing and implementing plans and policies that are consistent with the company's objectives. Along with ensuring that work is carried out properly and efficiently, management is also in charge of overseeing and directing people and creating a good work environment. In order to assure the company's ongoing success and expansion, they must also engage with stakeholders, such as shareholders, clients, and suppliers. In a nutshell, management's job is to see to it that the business is operating efficiently and toward its long-term objectives.
To learn more about management visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29023210
#SPJ4
the u.s. government passed draft laws during the vietnam war decreeing that men of a certain age had to serve in the military if they met specific physical requirements. which of the following schools of jurisprudential thought does such draft laws adhere to the most?
The draft laws during the Vietnam War in the US adhered to the idea of Legal Positivism, a school of jurisprudential thought that holds that the law is defined by the laws and regulations passed by a sovereign authority, regardless of any moral or ethical considerations.
Legal Positivism is a philosophical approach to law that emphasizes the importance of the written laws and regulations passed by a sovereign authority rather than moral or ethical considerations. According to this school of thought, the law is only valid if the appropriate authority has officially enacted it. In the case of the draft laws during the Vietnam War in the US, the government was considered the sovereign authority, and the laws passed by the government defined what was legally required of men of a certain age.
These laws were based on the idea that the government has the right to conscript individuals in times of national emergency and that individuals have a duty to serve their country in times of war. Legal Positivism holds that as long as these laws were enacted through the proper channels, they were valid and enforceable, regardless of any moral objections to the draft itself.
To learn more about Legal Positivism, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13400221
#SPJ4
question during the investigation of a large gambling operation, the police obtained a warrant to search a bookie's home based on the affidavit of an informant. the informant was a rival bookie who had never acted as an informant before, and much of the substance of the rival's information came from third-party sources. during the search, the police seized a variety of gambling evidence, including betting slips and a check from the defendant. the bookie and the defendant were arrested for violating the state's gambling laws, and separate trials were ordered. at a suppression hearing for the bookie, the court held that the search warrant for the bookie's home was not supported by probable cause and suppressed introduction of the evidence seized. the defendant moved to suppress introduction of the betting slips and the check on the same basis. if the court agrees that the search warrant of the bookie's home was not supported by probable cause, should the defendant's motion be granted?
Yes, the defendant's motion should be granted. Since the search warrant for the bookie's home was not supported by probable cause, the evidence seized during the search is inadmissible.
The defendant submitted a motion to suppress the evidence, contending that LASD's initial search of his residence infringed on his Fourth Amendment rights because LASD's assistance in the execution of the inspection warrant served as justification for carrying out a criminal search, making an arrest, and opening an investigation. Therefore, "Yes" is the response to the issue of whether police can search your home without a warrant. Only very seldom, without a warrant, may the police enter your private home or place of business. He contended that because the following criminal search warrant was issued as a direct result of the initial illegal search, all evidence seized and the results of that search should be removed from use at the trial.
To know more about illegal refer :
brainly.com/question/30451144
#SPJ4
can i get my license at 18 without a permit in texas
Yes, it is the solution. You are no longer necessary to obtain a learners permit after you become 18 years old.
A learner's permit cost in NL?The written knowledge test is free, but if you pass, your learner's permit will cost you $60 and be good for up to two years. How can I obtain my permit in Newfoundland and Labrador
when it's time to take your level 2 driving test?Student Permit
You must finish the Graduated Driver Licensing Program in order to obtain a driver's license in Newfoundland and Labrador (some exceptions may apply). The program is a methodical, step-by-step licensing procedure designed to assist new drivers in acquiring the information and skills necessary to do so safely.
To know more about learners permit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2128824
#SPJ4
which of these historic documents first established the principle of the rule of law?
The Magna Carta, signed in 1215, is widely considered to be the first document to establish the principle of the rule of law.
What is the Magna Carta in simple terms?Magna Carta was issued in June 1215 and was the first document to put into writing the principle that the king and his government was not above the law. It sought to prevent the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits of royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself.
Who created the Magna Carta and why?Magna Carta was written by a group of 13th-century barons to protect their rights and property against a tyrannical king. It is concerned with many practical matters and specific grievances relevant to the feudal system under which they lived
To know more about Magna Carta visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1619167
#SPJ4
how did josiah respond when he heard the words of the law
Josiah reads the law and tries to reform his country and steer people away from wicked ways.
Where is the story taken from?It is taken from the Bible, a collection of sacred literature that is held in high regard by devotees of numerous religions, including Judaism, Christianity, Samaritanism, and others. The Bible is a collection of works that were originally written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek and span several literary genres. These works span a variety of genres, including instruction manuals, stories, poetry, and forecasts. A corpus of works that a particular religious tradition or community considers as being a part of the Bible is known as the biblical canon. There are some differences in how Bible Christians define and interpret the book, even though most of them think it was inspired by God.
to learn more about the bible visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23570286
#SPJ4
To report suspected child abuse, you only need to have a reasonable cause to suspect a child is a victim of abuseTrue or False
The given statement is True. In many jurisdictions, it is mandatory to report suspected child abuse if you have reasonable cause to suspect that a child is a victim of abuse.
The requirement to report suspected abuse is meant to protect children and ensure they receive the help and support they need. The definition of "reasonable cause" can vary by state or jurisdiction. Still, it typically means that some evidence or information suggests that a child may be in danger of abuse or neglect.
If you suspect that a child is being abused or neglected, it is important to make a report to the appropriate authorities as soon as possible. In many jurisdictions, there are laws requiring certain individuals, such as teachers, doctors, social workers, and other professionals, to report suspected child abuse if they have a reasonable cause to suspect that a child is a victim.
To learn more about jurisdictions, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
what are the local controlled territories in the united states called?
The local controlled territories in the united states are called “local-control states.”
What are “local-control states"?
The local controlled states are states in which the governing and operation of public seminaries is largely conducted by tagged or appointed representatives serving on governing bodies, similar as academy boards or academy panels, that are located in the communities served by the seminaries. The role of governments and state agencies in the governance and management of schools varies from state to state, with some states having more direct control over public schools, while others allow local governments to set their own district school policies and function management systems. or community
Learn more on United States here:
brainly.com/question/30156817
#SPJ4
as a practicing lawyer in boston, oliver wendell holmes began his career assisting with his law firm's general business practice, which amounted to representing merchants and working on contracts. but as he gained experience and began to try cases developing a unique specialty in an area of law that required lawyers to . . .
Grasp the complexities and a variety of regulations that apply to transportation and cargo on navigable waters. When describing law in 1897, lawyer Oliver Howard Holmes, Jr. said: "The forecasts of what courts will accomplish in fact, &. nothing more pompous, are just what I understand by the law.
" He spent 15 years practising law at Boston law firms, serving as editor of the American Law Journal and a law professor at his alma school. At the age of 40, Holmes had already established himself as one of the foremost legal thinkers in the United States, as evidenced by the publication of his work "The Common Law" in 1881. The practise of law has been based on experience rather than logic. This well-known quote by John Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Learn more about law
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4
which of the following is an example of a bailment? question 5 options: borrowing a friend's car for a day feeding a neighbor's dog by tossing food over the fence house-sitting for a friend over the weekend losing your car keys in a restaurant babysitting your sister's child for the weekend
Borrowing a friend's car for a day is an example of a bailment. A bailment is a legal relationship in which one person (the bailor) entrusts property to another person (the bailee) for a specific purpose.
With the understanding that the property will be returned to the bailor once the purpose has been fulfilled. When you borrow a friend's car for a day, you are the bailee, and your friend is the bailor. The car is the property entrusted to you for a specific purpose (in this case, for transportation), and you have a legal obligation to return it to your friend once you have fulfilled that purpose.
This relationship creates a bailment, and you and your friend have rights and responsibilities under the law.
To learn more about bailment, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29627524
#SPJ4
why did the mexican government refuse to honor the terms of the treaty of velasco?
The mexican government refuse to honor the terms of the treaty of velasco because Santa Anna signed the treaties as a captive.
What were the treaties?The Texans government decisively defeated the Mexican army forces led by General Santa Anna on April 21, 1836, at San Jacinto. Santa Anna made an attempt to escape while dressed as a common soldier, but was captured the next day. Santa Anna and David G. Burnet, the acting president of Texas, signed two peace treaties on May 14. Ten articles made up the public treaty, and six more items made up the secret pact. When the terms of the open treaty were met, the secret agreement would be put into effect. The official treaty stipulated that fighting would end, Santa Anna would withdraw his men below the Rio Grande, and he would refrain from waging war against Texas in the future.
Learn more on government here:
brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
which of the following are qualifications that presidents look for in candidates to the supreme court?
Members of the Supreme Court have to be at least forty years of age and have to have been, for fifteen years or more, judges of a decrease courtroom or engaged in the exercise of regulation in the Philippines. SEC. 3 Additional Qualifications for Members of the Court of Appeals.
What are the criteria used with the aid of presidents to appoint Justices to the Supreme Court?The President nominates any person for a vacancy on the Court and the Senate votes to verify the nominee, which requires a easy majority. In this way, each the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal authorities have a voice in the composition of the Supreme Court.
What are the three requirements to be a Supreme Court justice?The skills of a Supreme Court Justice, as targeted with the aid of the Constitution, does now not supply requirements concerning age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship, but does have to be educated in the law.
Learn more about qualifications that presidents here;
https://brainly.com/question/7448479
#SPJ4
This type of law consists of rules and regulations, issued by agencies, that implement statutory law.
a.
common law
b.
statutory law
c.
administrative law
d.
constitutional law
The type of law consists of rules and regulations, issued by agencies, that implement statutory law is administrative law.
What is administrative law?This is the legal basis for conducting public administration. It stems from the necessity to construct a system of government under the law, a concept that is similar to the far older idea of justice under the law. Administrative law is crucial for constitutional, political, and legal reasons since administration involves the executive branch of government exercising power. Although it makes logical sense to consider the law governing public health, education, housing, and other public services as a part of administrative law, due to its immense size, it is typically viewed as supplementary.
Learn more on government here:
brainly.com/question/30144373
#SPJ4
which of the following sanctions are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party be in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed? question 20 options: compensatory damages exemplary damages punitive damages liquidation damages incidental damages
In order to put a party in the same position that they would have been in also had contract been completed, compensatory damages sanctions were given.
General Damages, often referred to as Ordinary Damages, are the harms that a contract violation will inevitably result in. In order to put a party in the same position that they would have been in also had contract been completed, compensatory damages sanctions were given. These losses are limited to immediate effects brought on by unforeseeable events. Damages that result from specific circumstances and contract violations are known as special damages. Whenever the contract is signed, the damages are pre-estimated and specified in advance and are paid out in the event of a contract breach.
Learn more about sanction
https://brainly.com/question/29547541
#SPJ4
any court can exercise jurisdiction over any person.
a. ture
b. false
The claim that is given that any court can have jurisdiction over anyone is untrue.
What else does legal authority mean in a particular setting?Definition. Geographic location describes the actual location of a statistical unit and the area for which numbers are gathered and shared. The scope or extent of judicial, legal, or other authority is referred to as jurisdiction.
What does a nation's jurisdiction entail?A state's jurisdiction is its ability to influence people, things, and events that take place on its soil. A legislative, executive, as well as judicial action may be used to exercise it. International law specifically addresses issues related to criminal law and largely leaves civil jurisdiction under national control.
To know more about jurisdiction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
the power of the presidency has been cause for debate mainly because
Although it does not explicitly state it, the Constitution gives the President a number of specific powers, including the ability to veto legislation choose and judges and other members of the executive branch.
What particular authority does the president have?The President appoints the leaders of all federal agencies, including Cabinet, in order to carry out and enforce the laws passed by Congress. The Vice Chairman is a member of the Executive Subsidiary and is prepared to take over as President if necessary.
According to the Constitution, the president has the authority to veto or sign laws, command the military services, request the written advice of their Cabinet, call or adjourn Legislature, grant reprieves as well as pardons, and receive and transmit
To know more about power of president visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23771636
#SPJ4