The statement given is False. The mediator does not propose a solution; rather, they facilitate communication and negotiation between parties to help them reach an agreement.
The mediator helps the parties identify the underlying issues and interests, explore options for resolution, and negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. The compromise reached by the parties is their own, not the mediators.
The mediator facilitates communication by clarifying misunderstandings, identifying the underlying issues, and helping the parties explore possible solutions. The mediator does not make decisions for the parties but helps them understand each other's perspectives and find common ground. The mediator may suggest possible compromises or options for resolution, but the final agreement is always the result of negotiation between the parties.
To learn more mediators, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/28174486
#SPJ4
where a long-arm statute is present, a defendant need not have minimum contact with a state for that state's courts to have jurisdiction over the defendant. (True or False)
True. A long-arm statute is a law that allows a state's courts to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant who does not have minimum contact with that state.
The purpose of a long-arm statute is to allow a state to reach out and assert jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant who has engaged in actions that have sufficient minimum contacts with the state. This means that even if the defendant does not have a physical presence in the state, the state's courts may still have jurisdiction over them if they have engaged in actions that are sufficient to establish minimum contacts with the state.This implies that even if the defendant has no physicality in the state, the state's courts can nevertheless have jurisdiction over them if they've taken activities that are sufficient to create even a minimal amount of contact with the state.
To learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
T/F the power of the federal government to completely regulate an activity, to the exclusion of any state regulation, is the power of occlusion.
True,the power of the federal government to completely regulate an activity, to the exclusion of any state regulation, is the power of occlusion.
The United States federal government (U.S. federal government or U.S. government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic primarily located in North America, consisting of 50 states, a city within a federal district (the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, where the majority of the federal government is based), five major self-governing territories, and several island possessions.
The federal government, also known as Washington, is divided into three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.
Learn more about federal government
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
the principle failing of the ucr is that only a minority of law enforcement agencies across the country take part in it annually. t/f
The statement '' A fundamental flaw of the UCR is that only a small number of law enforcement agencies nationwide participate each year '' is False .
The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program produces reliable statistics for law enforcement. It also provides information for criminal justice students, researchers, the media, and the public. This program has provided crime statistics since 1930. UCR records crimes reported to law enforcement, but only collects arrest data for simple assaults and sex crimes, with the exception of violent rapes. Third, the NCVS and UCR definitions of some crimes differ due to methodology.
The FBI's annual Uniform Crime Reports are based on data generated at the local level. Statistical reports on the number of different types of crimes, number of arrests, and types of unsolved crimes in the community serve many purposes, including possible budgetary justification.
To know more about UCR visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30273202
#SPJ4
a defendant was charged with the murder of her own child. two months prior to trial, the prosecutor interviewed a family friend who had known the defend
The trial court also came to the conclusion that both the gunshot and the footprints at the crime site matched those on the shoes that had been found on the accused.
What exactly is a conclusion example?
The conclusion example, which includes the thesis's concluding paragraph or sentence and a summary of its main points, completes the essay.
A strong conclusion will summarise your key ideas and points, bringing together all relevant data with an emotive appeal for a concluding remark that connects with your audience.
What do you want the reader to know or understand?Introduce that concept in one sentence. Summarize the main points of the text without using the exact same terms. One entire sentence should contain both the topic and your justification or assertion.
Know more about found Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20133764
#SPJ4
What region of the United States saw the beginnings of the industrial revolution
first?
O New England States
O Southern States
O Newly acquired Western States
O The Great Lakes region of the Northwest Territory
The region of the United States that saw the beginnings of the industrial revolution first was New England States.
What is Industrial Revolution?It broadly describes the transition from a handicraft-based economy to one dominated by industrial and machine production. These technological advancements brought about new methods of working and living that fundamentally altered civilization.
The Industrial Revolution was the gradual adoption of new manufacturing techniques in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States between roughly 1760 and some time between 1820 and 1840. The four different industrial revolutions are those involving coal, gas, electronics, nuclear power, the internet, and unrenewable energy. The New England States see the start of the industrial revolutions.
Learn more on United States here:
brainly.com/question/30156817
#SPJ4
T/F the u.s. constitution specifies how powers are allocated within state-level institutions.
The assertion made is untrue. The distribution of authority among state-level institutions is not spelled out in the U.S. Constitution.
What, in plain terms, does the US Constitution entail?The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches and their respective responsibilities. It also defines the basic law of the United States federal government. It is the earliest continuous governmental constitution still in use and has come to represent Western legal precedent.
What makes the US Constitution significant?One of the main goals of the Charter of rights and freedoms as it was drafted by the General assembly was to establish a government with sufficient authority to act on a government level without compromising fundamental rights.
To know more about US Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28824274
#SPJ4
strict scrutiny tests are applied to cases involving classifications based on . question 11 options: legitimacy marriage height gender age
In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used.
The greatest level of judicial review used by courts to determine whether laws, rules, or even other governmental policies are constitutional is known as strict scrutiny. When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used. The phrase "strict scrutiny" therefore refers to a standard that declares laws invalid unless they are "necessary," "narrowly drawn," or "closely tailored" to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest." Race, race, national origin, and (in some situations) alienage-based laws are all forms of discrimination.
(Strict scrutiny tests are applied to cases involving classifications based on __.
A. height
B. legitimacy
C. marriage
D. age
E. gender)
Learn more about scrutiny
https://brainly.com/question/29749587
#SPJ4
what type of government does russia have and who is the leader
Russia is technically a federal democratic state and Putin is the president and the end of then state in Russia.
What is Russia?Eastern Europe and Northern Asia are both parts of the Russian Federation, a transcontinental nation. With an internationally recognised territory that spans 17,098,246 square kilometers (6,601,670 sq mi)—eighth of the habitable landmass of the planet—it is the largest country in the world. Russia spans eleven time zones and has territorial borders with 14 other nations. With a population of more than 147 million, it is both the most populous country in Europe and the tenth most populous country in the entire globe. Moscow is the nation's capital and largest metropolis. The second-largest city in Russia and its cultural hub is Saint Petersburg. Novosibirsk, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod, and Kazan are a few other significant cities.
To learn more about Russia visit:
https://brainly.com/question/898911
#SPJ4
which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?
The Correct option (A) (B) ;The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the United States' federal judiciary. It has final appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law.
It also has original jurisdiction over a limited number of cases, including "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party."
The court has the power of judicial review, which allows it to invalidate a statute for violating a constitutional provision. It can also overturn presidential directives if they violate the Constitution or statutory law.
Learn more about supreme court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Full question which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?
The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
the policy concerns of the population at large
the policy preferences of Congress
which of the following is a microeconomic topic? what the government will do to address unemployment the effect of the budget deficit on the rate of interest reasons why inflation is rising reasons why a consumer buys more cheese
The study of individual economic agents, such as households and businesses, and how they behave and make decisions is known as microeconomics.
It investigates how these agents behave in markets and divide scarce resources between competing uses.
Microeconomic issues include things like "reasons a consumer purchases more cheese," "the effect of changes in a good's price on the quantity purchased," and "the determination of market price through supply and demand."
In contrast, macroeconomic topics like "What the government will do to address unemployment" and "The effect of the budget deficit on the rate of interest" look at the operation and composition of the entire economy.
To learn more about Microeconomy,
https://brainly.com/question/28183019
#SPJ4
Are voter ID laws racist? Why or why not?
Is critical race theory racist? Why or why not?
Please answer each question truthfully and to the best of your ability.
Please use facts to back up your answers.
Answer:
Explanation:
I do not have personal beliefs. I can provide information based on facts and expert opinions to help you understand the topics better.
Voter ID Laws:
There is ongoing debate and disagreement about the impact of voter ID laws on different racial groups. Proponents of voter ID laws argue that they are necessary to prevent election fraud and ensure the integrity of the voting process. Critics, however, argue that these laws can create barriers for some people, particularly those from communities of color, to exercise their right to vote. The impact of these laws can vary depending on the specifics of the law, the resources available to voters, and the implementation of the law.
Critical Race Theory:
Critical race theory is an intellectual movement and framework for examining the ways in which race and racism intersect with other forms of oppression and power. It seeks to understand how laws and legal institutions have contributed to and perpetuated systemic racial inequality. Some individuals and groups have criticized critical race theory as promoting reverse racism and being divisive, while others see it as a necessary tool for understanding and combating the impacts of systemic racism in society.
It is important to note that the interpretation and application of critical race theory can vary, and the term can mean different things to different people. However, it is generally seen as a tool for examining and challenging the ways in which race and racism continue to shape society and the legal system, rather than a statement about the inherent characteristics of any particular race or group of people.
_____________________________________________________
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
alli, a resident of alabama, has obtained a valid judgment against karson, a resident of kentucky. in this case:
In this case, Alli, a resident of Alabama, has obtained a valid judgment against Karson, who is a resident of Kentucky. This means that the court in Alabama has ruled in favor of Alli and issued a judgment against Karson.
To enforce this judgment, Alli may need to take additional legal steps in Kentucky, where Karson resides. The exact steps will depend on the laws of Kentucky and the case's specific details. A judgment is a court's official decision in a lawsuit. Once a judgment has been entered, the winning party (in this case, Alli) can enforce their rights and collect what is owed to them.
To enforce a judgment in Kentucky, Alli may need to register the Alabama judgment in Kentucky and then take further steps to collect what is owed, such as garnishing wages, seizing bank accounts, or selling assets. The exact steps will depend on Kentucky's specific laws and procedures and the specific details of the case.
To learn more about Karson, visit here.
https://brainly.com/question/14084465
#SPJ4
whether the Supreme Court has no role in constitutional revision
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to initiate a constitutional revision. This power lies with the legislative branch through the process of amending the Constitution.
It typically requires the approval of two-thirds of both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states. However, the Supreme Court plays a role in interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws, including any amendments to the Constitution.
The process of amending the U.S. Constitution is complex and requires a significant level of agreement across the country. The Constitution outlines the procedures for making amendments in Article V, which requires two-thirds of both houses of Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) to approve a proposed amendment. Once Congress approves an amendment, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states, either through their legislatures or state-level conventions.
To learn more Supreme Court, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
an effective query process supports the hospital’s compliance with
An efficient inquiry procedure helps the hospital adhere to billing/coding regulations and acts as a teaching tool for providers, CDI experts, and coding experts on the physician side.
What kind of instructional technology tool would that be?Examples include interactive whiteboards, virtual bulletin boards, content management systems, and virtual classrooms for online education. According to a Gallup poll from 2019, 65% of instructors utilize digital teaching aids on a daily basis.
What makes educational tools crucial?Because it enables modern instructors to incorporate new technologies and tools into their classrooms, educational technology in education is crucial. The learner-centeredness of the classroom may be enhanced by the teachers. It enables educators to interact with pupils in distinctive, original, and fair ways.
To know more about educational tool visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8325496
#SPJ4
as a judge in france, maurice is not allowed to interpret the law but relies on a strict set of codes to determine the outcome of a case. which type of law is in place in france? group of answer choices common law system civil law system mixed law system tribal law system theocratic law system
As a judge in France, Maurice is not allowed to interpret the law but relies on a strict set of codes to determine the outcome of a case. A type of law that is in place in France is known as civil law system. The Option B is correct.
What does civil law system mean?Civil law systems, also known as continental or Romano-Germanic legal systems, are found on all continents and cover approximately 60% of the global territory. They are based on Roman law concepts, categories, and rules, with some influence from canon law, and are sometimes supplemented or modified by local custom or culture.
The civil law tradition, despite being secularized over the centuries and emphasizing individual freedom, promotes human cooperation. Civil law, in its technical, narrow sense, refers to the law that governs people, things, and the relationships that develop between them, excluding not only criminal law but also commercial law, labor law, and so on.
Read more about civil law system
brainly.com/question/15049771
#SPJ1
compare and contrast the ethical and political forces that affect the development and operation of the legal system and stare decisis.
The principle of stare decisis states that courts base their judgements on earlier, comparable cases. A precedent is a decision that has previously been made.
How exactly do you refer to a court?
A court, often known as a court of law, is an individual or group of individuals with the authority to hear and decide cases involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
The French word cour, which denotes an enclosed yard, is the root of the Latin expression crtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again means an enclosed yard or the tenants of such a yard.
There are essentially three tiers of courts in this nation: trial courts, where disputes initially surface, intermediate (appellate) courts, which hear the bulk of appeals, and courts of last resort.
Know more about decision Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29347050
#SPJ4
during the middle ages, linen was becoming rare and laws were created to limit its use as a burial material. this is mainly because linen was needed or used for
During the middle ages, linen became rare, and laws were created to limit its use as a burial material. This is mainly because linen was needed or used for other purposes, such as clothing, household items, and trade.
The scarcity of linen led to laws being created to regulate its use as a burial material to conserve it for other important needs. Linen was used to making a wide range of products, from basic clothing to high-end luxury items, and it was also a valuable trade commodity.
This high demand, combined with limited production methods, made linen a precious resource, and as a result, laws were created to ensure that it was conserved and used only for the most important purposes. Scarcity of Linen as a burial material was seen as a luxury, and its use in this context was often restricted or banned to preserve the precious resource for other, more pressing needs.
To learn more about scarcity of linen, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13590676
#SPJ4
what are the pros and cons of plea bargaining
Pros: Lighter Penalty, Lower Charge
Cons: Keeping the prosecution's case from being problematic,
No "Not Guilty" verdict
What is plea bargainingIn criminal court proceedings, a plea bargain is an arrangement in which the prosecutor makes a concession to the defendant in exchange for the defendant entering a guilty or no contest plea.
Normally, the prosecution and the defendant negotiate a plea agreement. When a person pleads guilty to a lower charge, the prosecution frequently eliminates some of the other accusations against them. Despite being aware of the negotiation process, the court typically stays out of it.
Learn more about plea bargaining here:
https://brainly.com/question/4345768#:~:text=Expert%2DVerified%20Answer&text=In%20a%20plea%20bargain%2C%20a,of%20a%20full%20jury%20trial.
#SPJ1
what amendment is the right not to testify against oneself
Fifth amendment is the right not to testify against oneself.
What is amendment?Two different sorts of modifications to the Indian Constitution are mentioned in Article 368. A special majority of the Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) is required for one form of amendment, and a special majority of the Parliament and approval by half of the states is required for a second type of amendment. However, other articles allow for the change of certain Constitutional provisions by a simple majority of Parliament, or a majority of the members of each House present and voting, i.e., a majority of those present and voting.
Learn more on Constitution here:
brainly.com/question/30413880
#SPJ4
as it pertains to employment opportunity, the eeo strives to ______.
As it pertains to employment opportunity, the EEO strives to give individuals an equal chance for employment.
What is equal employment opportunity?The fundamental concept of EEO (or equal employment opportunity) is that everyone should be treated fairly while being taken into account for different employment decisions (including hiring, promotion, termination, compensation, etc.). At every stage of the employee lifecycle, employers must abide by the laws governing equal employment opportunities. Discriminating against individuals when hiring, promoting, or letting go of them from your company based on their personal qualities such as color, gender, or religion is unfair and illegal.
Learn more on laws here:
brainly.com/question/30144373
#SPJ4
Based on your understanding of Affirmative Action Supreme Court cases, what should be the impact of the Strict Scrutiny test on the future of Affirmative Action Programs?
Answer:
How does strict scrutiny relate to affirmative action?
For the unfamiliar: A race-conscious policy satisfies strict scrutiny if it 1) furthers a compelling (i.e. necessary) state interest, and 2) is “narrowly tailored” such that the policy minimizes, to the extent possible, differential treatment on the basis of race.
Explanation:
The "real heart" of the progressive movement was the effort by reformers to
a. preserve world peace.
b. use the government as an agency of human welfare.
c. ensure the Jeffersonian style of government.
d. get the government off the backs of the people.
e. promote economic and social equality.
The real goal of the progressive movement was to promote social and economic reality.
What was the progressive era?The Progressive Era's leaders worked on issues including labour rights, women's suffrage, economic reform, environmental protections, and the care of the poor, particularly destitute immigrants. These issues overlapped with one another.
Unions persisted in pressing for better living and working circumstances. Significant issues at the time were the push for an eight-hour workweek, restrictions on child labour, greater salaries, and workplace safety regulations.
The excesses and inequities of the Golden Age were curbed by economic reformers. Because the public opposed monopolies, legislators tried to restrict the massive corporations that held both economic and political power. Monopolies and trusts were broken up and prevented by the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was created in 1890 in response to monopolies in the railroad and steel industries.
To learn more about the progressive movements visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9369850
#SPJ4
A plaintiff and a defendant were involved in a car accident in the middle of an intersection. A police officer arrived, and after the officer took down all the basic information of both drivers and spoke with eyewitnesses and the two parties, the defendant said to the officer, "I ran a red light." The officer recorded this statement in his police report. The defendant also said to the plaintiff, "Don't worry, I have car insurance." During a trial for negligence, the plaintiff attempts to admit both statements against the defendant.
Which of the defendant's statements are admissible?
Both statements
Neither statement
Only the statement regarding car insurance
Only the statement regarding running the red light
Only the statement regarding running the red light. This statement of the defendant is admissible.
Despite the fact that a police report may fall under the business records exception, a witness' statement that appears in the report normally does not because the witness is not speaking on behalf of the police. However, if the statement is provided by an opposing party, it may be considered an opposing party's statement, which is a statement made by a party to the ongoing dispute and is not hearsay. Given that the defendant made the statement in the police report, it would count as an opposing party's statement in this case.
Learn more about defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/3246553
#SPJ4
Which ofthe following statements is NOT true aboutthe Articles of Confederation and the Constitution a The Great Compronise was necessary t0 directly address the key weaknesses ofthe Articles of Confederation_ The Articles of Confederation's promotion of state sovereignty would make it difficult to accomplish substantive national goals The Constitution needed to replace the confederation with republican system of govemment d. The Article of Confederation $ tax policies were necessary to limit the national govemment ad the Constitution honored that system
The correct answer is (d) d. The Article of Confederation's tax policies were necessary to limit the national government, and the Constitution honored that system is NOT true.
The Articles of Confederation did not have a strong central government, leading to problems with revenue collection and the ability to pay debts. The Constitution provided a stronger central government with the power to tax, which helped address these issues.
The Constitution also aimed to create a more balanced system of government between the states and the national government rather than simply honoring the principle of limited government embodied in the Articles of Confederation.
To learn more about the Articles of Confederation, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. when a defendant who has been served wants to sue a plaintiff, the plaintiff becomes a___. question 10 options: counterplaintiff defendant appellee counterdefendant appellant
.When a defendant who has been served wants to sue a plaintiff, the plaintiff becomes a counterplaintiff Option (a)
The plaintiff is the party who files a lawsuit (also known as an action) in court. The plaintiff is seeking legal redress in this manner. If the search is successful, the court will enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and issue the necessary court orders .
"Plaintiff" is the term used in civil cases in most English-speaking jurisdictions, the notable exceptions being England and Wales, where a plaintiff has, since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules in 1999, been known as a "claimant" and Scotland, where the party has always been known as the "pursuer". In criminal cases, the prosecutor brings the case against the defendant, but the key complaining party is often called the "complainant".
Learn more about plaintiff
https://brainly.com/question/29213554
#SPJ4
determine graphically the magnitude and direction of their resultant using the parallelogram law. g
By using the parallelogram law the length of the diagonal is measured to be 1,391 N, and the value of is found to be 47.8°
The parallelogram law is used to determine the magnitude of the resultant force on the hook, which is represented graphically as 1,391 N and is located at 47.8° with the horizontal. Graphically displaying the magnitude and direction of the product of two or more vectors is possible using the parallelogram law.
In order to do this, the vectors must be represented as directed line segments, which must then be arranged tail to tail to form a parallelogram. The parallelogram's diagonal serves as the resultant vector. You can use the Pythagorean theorem to determine the length of the diagonal of the parallelogram and use that resulted information to determine the magnitude of the resultant vector.
Drawing a line from the tail of one vector to the head of the other will reveal the direction of the resulting vector. It is significant to remember that the parallelogram law is not restricted to just two vectors and is applicable to any number of vectors. By using the parallelogram law, one will be able to and can add several vectors together to find the sum of their components.
To learn more about parallelogram law: https://brainly.com/question/23867486
#SPJ4
Note that the full question is:
Two forces are applied as shown to a hook. Determine graphically the magnitude and direction of their resultant using ( a ) the parallelogram law
abby gets a state court civil judgment against casey, but casey does not pay. which of the following is one of the tools available to abby to enforce the judgment against casey?
Writ of Execution is is one of the tools available to Abby to enforce the judgment against Casey.
A writ of execution is a court order that authorises law enforcement officials to start transferring property as the result of a legal decision. It makes a judgement of possession effective. Assets, cash, and real estate are all examples of property. An official document issued by a court that establishes ownership rights is known as a judgement of possession. The judge may then issue a writ of execution to start the property transfer when the court issues a judgement of possession. The writ of execution actually starts the transfer procedure from a judgement debtor to a plaintiff; the judgement for possession just declares the plaintiff has a claim to the property.
Learn more about writ of execution here:
https://brainly.com/question/15836478
#SPJ4
True or false: The Constitution does not provide a basis for a right to privacy
The Constitution does not provide a basis for a right to privacy - False
Despite the fact that the United States Constitution does not expressly mention privacy, Justice Louis D. Brandeis claimed in his dissent in Gilbert v. Minnesota (1920) that the First Amendment safeguarded a person's right to privacy in their own house.
The right to privacy is a fundamental right, according to the Supreme Court, which also ruled that other fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution, including the right to life and personal liberty, derive from this right. Although the right to privacy isn't mentioned in the Constitution directly, the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments have all been interpreted by the courts to establish a foundation for such a right.
Read more about Constitution on:
https://brainly.com/question/21235714
#SPJ4
what is the difference between your marginal and effective tax rates?
The marginal tax rate is the total tax rate applied to a person's entire taxable income, whereas the marginal tax rate is the rate applied to the last dollar of earnings.
How is the marginal tax rate determined?Finding the change in tax collected and dividing it by the transformation in tax liability is the formula for calculating the marginal tax rate.
Why is the marginal tax rate called that?Because your "marginal" income is what is taxed at the following highest tax bracket as you jump higher in tax brackets, this tax rate is known as the marginal tax rate. The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the actual owed taxes (as shown by the tax statements) by the reported pre-tax income of the company.
To know more about marginal tax rate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14435010
#SPJ4
A person writes negative posts on social media about people who immigrate into the United States. Their posts say that all immigrants should be refused entry, with force if necessary. The community calls for the person's arrest and conviction, claiming that their speech is hateful and must be banned.
Which statement about this scenario is true?
Negative expression is not protected, but there are limits to punishment for it.
Negative expression is also a protected right, regardless of the circumstances.
Negative expression is not protected and the person can be arrested and punished.
Negative expression is also a protected right unless it was intended and led to violence.
If a person writes negative posts on social media about people who immigrate into the United States. The correct statement about this scenario is: D. Negative expression is also a protected right unless it was intended and led to violence.
How Negative expression is also a protected right?In the United States, freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution and this freedom of speech help to give people the right to express their opinions or thought including negative opinions, without fear of government retaliation.
In this scenario, if the person's speech was intended to incite violence against immigrants and posed a direct and immediate threat, it may be considered unprotected and subject to punishment. However, if the speech was simply hateful or offensive but did not directly incite violence, it would still be protected by the First Amendment.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about Negative expression is also a protected right here:https://brainly.com/question/28449529
#SPJ1