The given statement is true.
That a court is considered to have original jurisdiction if it has the power to hear appeals from the trial court.
What is the court?
Any individual or organization with the authority to administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters in accordance with the law is referred to as a court. An individual or organization with the legal authority to hear and decide disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military matters is known as a court, often known as a court of law.
Only disputes between states or between ambassadors and other senior ministers are given original jurisdiction under the Constitution. Due to its appellate authority, the Court is able to review decisions made by lower courts.
For such more question on court
https://brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
which of the following statements best characterizes the relationship between inventions and cities during the late nineteenth century?
Cities played a crucial role in the proliferation of inventions during the late 19th century by providing a hub for technological innovation and commercialization through their large populations, skilled labor, and access to resources and markets.
As previously mentioned, for associations, the capability to get ahead of the competition is one of the most significant reasons to introduce. Successful, innovative businesses are suitable to keep their operations, services and products applicable to their guests' requirements and changing request conditions.
The smash in productivity began with many specialized bias, including the spinning hinny, spinning mule, and power impend. First mortal, water, and eventually brume power were applied to operate power looms, registering machines, and other technical innovations.
To learn more about technical innovation, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/14300062
#SPJ4
if a person who lives in one state does business within another state, contracts to supply goods or services within another state, or commits a tort (a civil wrong) in another state, that person may become subject to the jurisdiction of the other state's courts through
If a person who lives in one state business within another state, contracts to supply goods or services within another state, or commits a tort in another state, that person may become subject to the jurisdiction of the other states courts through Application of a long-arm statute Option (C)
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO) was established in 1939 as the administrative agency of the United States federal court system. The AO, as the federal judicial branch's central support entity, provides the federal courts with a wide range of legislative (legislative assistance), administrative, legal, financial, management, program (program evaluation), and information technology support services.
The Judicial Conference of the United States, which is composed of the Chief Justice, the chief judge of each court of appeals, a district court judge from each regional judicial circuit, and the chief judge of the United States Court of International Trade, has direct supervision over it.
Learn more about States Court
https://brainly.com/question/30408538
#SPJ4
Full Question :If a person who lives in one state business within another state, contracts to supply goods or services within another state, or commits a tort in another state, that person may become subject to the jurisdiction of the other states courts through _______________________
A. Proof of a due process violation
B. A property dispute within the state
C. Application of a long-arm statute
the government protects intellectual property rights by enforcing copyright rules on textbooks. suppose scans the pages of this and other introductory economics textbooks and makes them available for downloading at no charge.
Students or readers would have to make payments for buying an introductory book. But if books are made available for download free of cost, then it would indeed increase the welfare of the students.
Such step of college or school would not benefit students over the long run or next generation might not be benefitted from such a move.
Intellectual property rights induce the firms to make new innovation and introduce new products in the market. But selling books without the permission of the firm would discourage future investment by a firm in new books. So the future generation would be negatively affected by the move of the organization that scans pages.
Learn more about Students
https://brainly.com/question/28047438
#SPJ4
Full Question: The Government Protects Intellectual Property Rights By Enforcing Copyright Rules On Textbooks. Suppose An Organization Scans The Pages Of This And Other Introductory Economics Textbooks And Makes Them Available For Downloading At No Charge. As A Current Textbook Consumer, Would You Be Better Off Or Worse Off? What Are The Implications For The Next
The government protects intellectual property rights by enforcing copyright rules on textbooks. Suppose an organization scans the pages of this and other introductory economics textbooks and makes them available for downloading at no charge. As a current textbook consumer, would you be better off or worse off? What are the implications for the next generation of economics students?
The law that specifically prohibits "questionable" or "dubious" payments to foreign officials in an effort to secure business contracts is called the:
a) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
b) General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
c) Securities and Exchange Act.
d) North American Free Trade Agreement.
The Foreign Corrupt Transactions Act is the law which thus specifically forbids making "dubious" or "questionable" payments to foreign diplomats in order to obtain business contracts (FCPA).
What does the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) mean?Act against U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices. According to the FCPA, it is illegal for a U.S. person or business to offer, pay, or offer to pay money to just about any foreign official in order to win or keep business.
What is the Foreign Corrupt Act's main goal?The Foreign corrupt practices act has two main clauses: (1) a generally pro provision that forbids U.S. companies, citizens, and certain foreign securities issuers from corruptly paying a foreign official in order to win or keep business
To know more about Foreign Corrupt Transactions Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14673735
#SPJ4
What is the idea of a state ignoring or failing to enforce national laws called?
The idea of a state ignoring or failing to enforce national laws is commonly referred to as "lawlessness" or "anarchy".
Anarchy can be some type of rule where people are not given any right to involve in political duties and the king is the supreme power this type of rule is opposite to the monarchy where the king looks after his people's welfare and rules his land without any discrimination.
In political science, lawlessness is sometimes referred to as "state collapse" or "governance failure". When a state is unable or unwilling to enforce its laws, it may result in a lack of security and social order, leading to chaos and insecurity.
To know more about lawlessness
brainly.com/question/231680
#SPJ4
What law set the rules for admitting new states?
Answer:
Admission to the Union is provided by the Admissions Clause of the United States Constitution in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1, which authorizes the United States Congress to admit new states into the Union beyond the thirteen states that already existed when the Constitution came into effect.
Explanation:
Examining different perspectives, including those we do not agree with, is an important part of
imminent action
confirmation bias
building consensus
social consequences
Examining different perspectives, including those humans do not agree with, is an important part of building consensus, which is the third option, as it allows humans to gain a deeper understanding of the issues.
What is the significance of the different perspectives?By observing different points of view, one can identify areas of agreement and disagreement, work toward finding acceptable solutions, and achieve more effective and long-term results.
Hence, examining different perspectives, including those humans do not agree with, is an important part of building consensus, which is the third option, as it allows humans to gain a deeper understanding of the issues.
Learn more about the different perspectives here.
https://brainly.com/question/14569446
#SPJ1
A man witnessed a hit-and-run accident in which a truck struck and killed a child. Shortly after the accident, the witness gave police a signed, handwritten statement with a description of the truck, including the make and model, as well as a description of the driver of the truck. After several months, the authorities identified and charged a man who fit the witness's description, although the pickup truck was never located. In the interim, however, the witness had suffered a brain injury and no longer remembered any of the events from the date of the accident. At trial, the prosecutor called the witness to testify. The prosecutor first showed the witness a photo of a vehicle of the same make and model as the truck in an attempt to refresh the witness's memory. The defense objected but was overruled by the judge. When this failed to refresh the witness's memory, the prosecutor showed the witness his earlier handwritten and signed statement. Again, the defense objected and was overruled. The witness testified that he had no memory of the events described in the statement, but that he recognized his handwriting on the statement and that the statement accurately reflected what he witnessed at the time. The prosecutor then moved to introduce the photo and statement into evidence as exhibits, and the defense again objected. How should the judge rule?
A. The judge should admit both the photo and the statement into evidence as exhibits.
B. The judge should admit the photo, but not the statement, into evidence as an exhibit.
C. The judge should admit the statement, but not the photo, into evidence as an exhibit.
D. The judge should not admit the photo or the statement into evidence as exhibits.
The photo and the statement shouldn't be allowed as exhibits by the judge.
In general, a person qualified to attest to the correctness of an image must properly verify it under oath in order for it to be acceptable. Exhibits or Marks are the names given to official documents that are produced at the evidence stage. There is no distinction between them, and both must be proven in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act. The photo and the statement shouldn't be allowed as exhibits by the judge. The courts will assess their evidentiary value at the time of the final judgement. Evidence that unfairly hurts, hurts, hurts, hurts, or biases the case without proving any proper facts and enrages the jury or the court without presenting any crucial facts but frequently relies on supposition.
Learn more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/29973933
#SPJ4
although identifying the legal issue is a four-step process, it is not always necessary to go through all four steps.True or False
The statement '' Identifying legal issues is a four-step process, but you don't necessarily have to go through all four steps '' is True .
Essentially, legal research is the process you use to identify and find the law, including statutes, regulations and court decisions, that apply to the facts of your case. In most cases, the purpose of legal research is to find support for a particular legal issue or decision. The existence of a legal obligation owed by the defendant to the plaintiff. Defendant breach of duty. Plaintiff is injured. Evidence that the defendant's violation caused the injury
A contract consists of four main elements: offer, acceptance, willingness to enter into a legally binding legal relationship, and consideration. Oral contracts are enforceable as long as they contain the essential parts of the contract.
To know more about legal issues visit :
https://brainly.com/question/24791318
#SPJ4
individuals are most likely to obey when demands are made by a
'Individuals are most likely to obey when demands are made by a A close friend physically attractive individual legitimate authority subordinate colleague of similar rank.
Explain Demand Curve?The amount demanded for a commodity is determined by its price as well as many other factors, including the prices of other commodities, consumer income and tastes, and seasonal impacts. All parameters except the commodity price are frequently held constant in basic economic analysis; the analysis then comprises assessing the link between various price levels and the greatest quantity that consumers may theoretically purchase at each of those prices. Price-quantity combinations can be shown on a curve called a demand curve, with price on the vertical axis and quantity on the horizontal axis.
To know more about Demand visit:
brainly.com/question/29892538
#SPJ4
Demands issued by a legitimate authority are those that people will most likely comply with.
Why does someone obey?In real-world circumstances, people follow orders out of a desire to be rewarded, a desire to avoid the bad effects of disobeying, and a conviction that the person in charge is legitimate. In increasingly dire circumstances, people nevertheless comply even when forced to go against their morals or break the law.For instance, if the teacher asks the class to choose between extra recess, no homework, or candy, the majority of the students will follow the majority's lead once a few have voted. If the majority voted differently in a different classroom, the vast majority of students would follow that decision.Demands issued by a legitimate authority are those that people will most likely comply with.To learn more about Demands refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1245771
#SPJ1
when the result of a lawsuit at the trial court level is appealed, the successful party in the trial court is called the . question 2 options: appellee appellant petitioner counterdefendant counterplaintiff
In a civil lawsuit, either side may appeal to a higher court. The appellant, or petitioner on rare occasions, is the person who filed the appeal.
What is an instance of an appeal?
They would file an appeal against the judgement, he said. We're going to appeal the decision. To prevent her extradition, Maguire has filed an appeal with the Supreme Court. The sentence was later overturned on appeal by Heath.
We utilise appeals because...
In both civil and criminal matters, appeals are typically based on claims that the trial judge misapplied the law or violated procedural rules. The appellant, or petitioner on rare occasions, is the party making the appeal.
know more about occasions:
https://brainly.com/question/29322973
#SPJ4
The law that states that as the price of a good, service, or resource rises, the quantity supplied will increase, all else held constant, is the law of
The law that states that as the price of a good, service, or resource rises, the quantity supplied will increase, all else held constant, is the law of supply.
What is Law of supply?The law of supply is a microeconomic principle that asserts, with all other things being equal, that if the cost of an item or service rises, suppliers will offer more of those goods or services, and vice versa.
According to the rule of supply, suppliers will try to maximize their earnings when the price of an item rises by offering more products for sale.
Learn more on law here:
brainly.com/question/30161327
#SPJ4
The owner of an electronics store brought a civil suit for the value of stolen electronics against one of his former employees, who had previously been convicted in a criminal court for the theft of the same goods. During the civil trial, the plaintiff-owner called a witness whom he hoped would testify that she saw the defendant in possession of the stolen goods the day after the electronics store was robbed. The witness, however, testified that she did not see the defendant in possession of the goods, and that she was actually out of town the day after the robbery. The plaintiff seeks to introduce the witness's testimony in the criminal case, in which she testified that she saw the defendant in possession of the goods the next day. The defendant objects to the introduction of the statement. Should the court allow the testimony into evidence?
Answers:
Yes, for impeachment only.
Yes, as substantive evidence only.
Yes, for both impeachment and as substantive evidence.
No, not for any reason.
False pretense is the depiction of past or present events in a way that is intended to deceive or create information trial.
The defendant's neighbor's testimony cannot be used to convict him in the circumstances because, although being a witness, she was found guilty of making false statements about the defendant in order to cause her own injuries by spreading a slick liquid on the road and slipping on it. The physician-patient privilege does not apply to the defendant's testimony since it does not cover non-medical information provided by patients. Since the privilege cannot be used when pertaining to information that deals with non-medical information, the court should overturn the objection trial.
Learn more about trial here :
https://brainly.com/question/24260027
#SPJ4
What does split disburse mean?
Split Disbursement: A Department of Defense-mandated method of ensuring that the traveler's Government travel charge card (GTCC) bill is paid on time.
According to Michael G. Weber, Air Force travel card program manager at the Pentagon, split disbursement requires travelers to total their GTC expenses and authorize enough funds to be sent automatically to Bank of America to pay off their charges. Any outstanding travel settlement will be credited to the traveler's personal account.
"Although the 2003 National Defense Authorization Act mandated this change to reduce the number of delinquent travel card accounts, split disbursement is truly a win-win for everyone," Weber said. "It simplifies the payment process for travelers, gets money to banks faster, and reduces the number of delinquent accounts."
Learn more about split disburse
https://brainly.com/question/14480852
#SPJ4
Identify a correct statement about the different branches of the U.S. government.The legislative branch, including the many regulatory agencies that the president oversees, is responsible for enforcing the laws passed by Congress.The executive branch consists of the two houses of Congress.The legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the U.S. government play an important role in creating the legal environment for human resource management.The judicial branch has enacted a number of laws governing human resource activities.
The legislative branch establishes all laws, declares war, governs domestic and international trade, and sets tax and spending priorities.
Describe the legislative branch with an example:The House and Senate, often referred to as the Congress, make up the legislative branch. The legislative branch also has the authority to enact all laws, declare war, regulate interstate and international trade, and choose the most significant taxation and spending priorities.
What is the function of the legislature?Their power may also include approving presidential nominations, ratifying treaties, investigating the executive branch, impeaching and removing officials from the executive and judicial departments, and addressing citizen grievances.
To know more about legislative branch visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11883152
#SPJ4
It believes that law is simply the commands of the state backed up by force.
Positive law jurisprudence believes that law is simply the commands of the state backed up by force and punishments. It is contrary to the philosophy of natural law.
It believes that law is simply the commands of the state backed up by force.
Constructive law Jurisprudence holds that the only thing that constitutes law is the state's orders accompanied by force and penalties. It runs counter to the natural law school of thought. The most influential school of thought in law is legal positivism. At the start of the 19th century, the positivist movement got underway. The analytical school's methodology is advantageous. The school's legal experts believe that the relationship between the law and the state is the element that matters most. Positive laws are sometimes "pressed" on the residents of a certain area, which may explain why the term "positive" was adopted to characterise them. These laws may take the form of statutes, court judgements, or ordinances, for instance. Government legislators and judges have the power to create and enforce laws.
Which of the following is true about positive law jurisprudence?
It emphasizes that contemporary law should focus on long standing legal principles.
It believes that law reflects the cultural traditions of a people.
It is similar to the philosophy of natural law.
It believes that law is simply the commands of the state backed up by force.
It supports the idea that law can change to meet new developments in society.
Learn more about positive law here:
https://brainly.com/question/20354955
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. when following a motorcycle, drivers must remember that motorcycles can ___ than other vehicles.
When following a motorcycle, drivers must remember that motorcycles can stop more quickly than other vehicles.
What are the advantages of owning a motorcycle?Owning a motorbike has a number of advantages, including as lower maintenance and petrol costs, improved manoeuvrability in traffic, and the ability to park in tight areas. Another benefit of riding a motorbike is the sense of freedom and adventure it may bring, as well as a special and close connection to the road. In addition, motorbikes provide a speedier and more effective means of transportation in crowded locations. They may also be a fantastic choice for road vacations or beautiful drives. However, it's crucial to remember that compared to vehicles, motorbikes provide more safety dangers, necessitating the need for appropriate training, equipment, and defensive riding techniques.
To learn more about motorcycle visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29333261
#SPJ4
the protection of us _ is one of the goals of the us constitution.
This document's Preamble outlines its six key objectives: to create justice, to guarantee domestic tranquillity, to provide for the common defense, and to advance the public welfare.
What is an example of a preamble?a declaration that is made at the start of something (like a legal document) and typically provides the justification for the sections that follow. [count] We the People of the United States, in order to build a more perfect union, declare in the preamble of the United States Constitution.
Could you describe a preamble?A prologue is a statement that introduces a document and discusses its goals and philosophy. A constitution outlines the goals of its drafters and the background to its formation.
To know more about preamble visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30287427
#SPJ4
which of the following is necessary for someone to file a fair housing complaint against a real estate licensee?
For someone to file a fair housing complaint against a real estate licensee, they must demonstrate that they have experienced "housing discrimination."
The Fair Housing Act (FHA) is a federal law that prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. The FHA applies to all aspects of the sale, rental, and financing of housing, including the activities of real estate licensees. If someone believes that they have been the victim of housing discrimination, they may file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or with a state or local fair housing agency. In order to file a complaint, the person must demonstrate that they have experienced housing discrimination and provide evidence to support their claim.
The complete question is :
which of the following is necessary for someone to file a fair housing complaint against a real estate licensee?
a. Fair Housing Act (FHA)
b. discrimination in housing
c. housing provider
d. Complaints about housing
To learn more about Fair Housing Act (FHA) here:
https://brainly.com/question/14172324
#SPJ4
in a civil action tried to a jury, the defendant objected to the introduction by the plaintiff of certain evidence without the judge's first making a preliminary ruling on the admissibility of the evidence. for which evidence is the defendant's objection not appropriate?
The defendant objected to the plaintiff introducing specific evidence in a civil case before a jury without the court first issuing a finding.
Who is the defendant in every case?
Typically, "The People," or the State acting on behalf of the victim, is referred to as the plaintiff in criminal cases. The person or persons accused with a crime or violation of a law are known as the Defendant. The plaintiff in a civil case is the individual or people who claim that they have been the victim of wrongdoing.
a someone who files a civil lawsuit. The term "plaintiff" is no longer used in England and Wales (since 1998), but it is still used in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and the majority of other common law countries. Scots people use the term "pursuer."
Know more about court Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8433911
#SPJ4
What does the Constitution say about state and federal government?
As a result, the Constitution gives the federal government a wide range of authorities, but the 10th Amendment, which stipulates that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution.
What does that mean, the Constitution?
The constitution is the state's governing document. It outlines the fundamental principles that the state is governed by. It describes the relationships between the main state institutions and gives an overview of them (for example, between the executive, legislature and judiciary).
(1) Unlike a written constitution, an unwritten constitution does not resemble a book or other written work. (2) A written constitution must be drafted and adopted by the people's constituent assembly. Unwritten constitutions are the result of a protracted process of constitutional growth.
Know more about Amendment Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
Are voter ID laws racist? Why or why not? Please answer the question truthfully and to the best of your ability. Please provide facts and statistic to support your answer. Thank You
Whether or not the voter ID laws are racist depends on one's perspective and interpretation of the evidence and the impact of these laws on different communities. The intention of those who support or oppose such laws also varies and can range from a genuine belief in their necessity to political motivations.
What are the controversy surrounding voter ID laws being racist or not?The debate over the impact and intention of voter ID laws is highly politicized and complex. Some people that voter ID laws are racially discriminatory because they disproportionately affect minority communities, who may face barriers in obtaining the necessary identification, such as a lack of access to government-issued ID, limited resources, and discriminatory practices in the process of obtaining ID.
Some others people argue that voter ID laws are necessary to prevent voter fraud and ensure the integrity of the election process, and that they do not disproportionately affect minority communities.
Read more about voter ID laws
brainly.com/question/19008711
#SPJ1
contrast the foreign policies of roosevelt, taft, and wilson. drag each policy to the correct president. a) moral diplomacy. b) big stick diplomacy. c) dollar diplomacy.
These are the main ideas of the foreign policies of Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson.
Intervene with the military force - Theodore Roosevelt.
Invested in foreign economies - William H. Taft.
Acted based on moral imperatives - Woodrow Wilson.
President Theodore Roosevelt was the president from 1901 to 1909.
He was a Republican.
His foreign policy was based on the concept of "Big Stick."
He threatened to use force when it was necessary.
President William H. Taft was the president from 1909 to 1913.
He was a Republican too.
His foreign policy was based on investing in other countries and having economic influence over them.
He developed the concept of "Dollar Diplomacy" in order to invest in underdeveloped countries.
Woodrow Wilson was the president from 1913 to 1921.
He was a Democrat.
He tried to make decisions based on high morals, trying to influence foreign policy.
He decided to stay neutral at the beginning of World War I, until major international incidents forced him to enter World War I.
We conclude that these US Presidents developed different foreign policies, according to their personalities, political conditions, and international circumstances.
Learn more about this foreign policies
https://brainly.com/question/29822820
#SPJ4
the law that states that as the price of a good, service, or resource rises, the quantity supplied will increase, all else held constant, is the law of true or false
The regulation of provide is the microeconomic regulation that states that, all other factors being equal, as the fee of a top or provider increases, the quantity of goods or offerings that suppliers provide will increase, and vice versa.
What is the law of demand law?Image result for the law that states that as the rate of a good, service, or aid rises, the quantity provided will increase, all else held constant, is the law of true or false
Definition: The regulation of demand states that other factors being regular (cetris peribus), rate and quantity demand of any appropriate and provider are inversely related to every other. When the charge of a product increases, the demand for the same product will fall.
Learn more about demand law here;
https://brainly.com/question/14233010
#SPJ4
What powers do each branch of government have over the other?
Legislative—Issues laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Executive—Implements laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judicial—Examines laws (Supreme Court and other courts).
The legislative branch creates laws and is represented by the United States Congress; the executive branch enforces laws and is represented by the president and people who report to the president; and the judicial branch evaluates laws and is represented by the Supreme Court and other courts.
The United States Federal Government is divided into three branches to ensure a separation of powers: legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch has its own powers and responsibilities, including working with the other branches, to ensure the government is effective and citizens' rights are protected.
Learn more about legislative branch
https://brainly.com/question/11883152
#SPJ4
what kinds of powers are defined by the fact that they are granted to the national government but not denied to the states?
Powers that are defined by the fact that they are shared between the federal and state powers are called concordant powers.
What are concordant powers?Concurrent powers are those of a federal state that are shared by the federal government and each of its constituent political bodies, such as a state or province.. Within the same region, in respect to the same group of individuals, and with regard to the same subject-matter, these powers may all be used concurrently. Reserved powers, which the federal government does not possess, and exclusive federal powers are contrasted with concurrent powers (forbidden to be possessed by the states, or requiring federal permission).
The ability to tax, spend, and establish inferior courts are a few examples of the concurrent powers that the federal and state governments in the United States share.
To learn more about concurrent powers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7578525
#SPJ4
the __ clause of the constitution states that if there is a conflict between state law and federal law in an area of concurrent authority, the federal law takes precedence over the state law.
The clause that privilages federal law over state law is called Supremacy Clause.
What is federal law?Federal law is the corpus of regulations created by a country's federal government. When many political units, such as states or provinces, band together to form a federation, they hand over much of their individual sovereignty and power to the federal government while holding onto or reserving other, more limited, powers. As a result, there are two or more tiers of governance inside a defined geographical area. Federal law is the body of law governing the shared central government.
Pakistan, India, Russia, the former Soviet Union, Australia, Brazil, Canada and the United States are a few countries with examples of their federal governments.
To learn more about federal law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ4
a bill passed by the government stipulates the mandatory use of revised engine mapping and particulate filters in the automobile industry. which of the following factors of the marketing environment has affected the automobile industry in this scenario?
Revisions to engine mapping and particulate filters are required for usage in the automotive industry, according to a government-passed statute.
What do scientists mean by particulate?
The term "particulate matter" (also known as "particle pollution") refers to a combination of solid particles and liquid droplets that are found in the air. Some particles, like dust, dirt, soot, or smoke, are large enough or sufficiently opaque to be visible to the unaided eye.
How does particulate matter work?
The term "airborne particulate matter" (PM) refers to a collection of different chemical species rather than a single pollutant. It is a complicated mixture of solids and aerosols made up of tiny liquid droplets, fragments of dry solid, and solid cores with liquid coatings.
know more about industry:
https://brainly.com/question/2839443
#SPJ4
please discuss the hodge v. evans* case and, specifically, why the court's holding either does or does not seem to you to be good law.
On September 2, 1980, Albert Hodge left his position as assistant counsel and assistant secretary of Mellon National Corporation and Mellon Bank in Pittsburgh to accept a position as general counsel and vice president at Evans Financial Corporation in Washington, D.C. Hodge was fired from his job eight months later.
Then he filed the lawsuit, claiming that his dismissal violated his employment contract. Evans' president and COO, Jon Tilley, agreed to Hodge's request for a permanent position. Following this verbal agreement, Hodge joined the Evans. Tilley consistently prevented him from carrying out the duties for which he was hired, until on May 7, 1981, Evans demanded his immediate resignation without providing any reason for termination.
The district court denied Evans' directed verdict motion and refused to instruct the jury on the Statute of Frauds defense, and the jury awarded Hodge $175,000 in damages. The court's decision appears to be sound legal reasoning because Evans was incorrect in this case because oral contracts are also legally enforceable. Furthermore, the court's decision is correct.
Learn more about district court
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
choose either congress or the supreme court, and present an argument for why your choice is most responsible for advancing the principle of equality of opportunity in the united states.
the Constitution offers Congress too a lot strength over the economy. The powers listed in Brutus No.
1, that support the argument that the Constitution offers congress too a great deal power, are the powers to tax and create a standing army. These powers are given to the Constitution with the aid of the commerce clause and supremacy clause.
Which of the following first-class represents the dynamic distribution of energy between the kingdom and country wide governments?Federalism reflects the dynamic distribution of power between the country wide and kingdom governments.
What was the strongest argument made in Brutus 1?Brutus 1 argued that federal electricity used to be awful and that the Constitution offers too tons energy to the federal government.
Learn more about present an argument here;
https://brainly.com/question/13517695
#SPJ4