The statement is True. In the United States, a tort action may be commenced and tried either in the county or district where the tort was committed or where the defendant resides.
This is known as the principle of "venue," and it is based on the idea that a defendant should be able to defend themselves in a court that is convenient and accessible to them. By allowing a tort action to be brought in either the location where the tort was committed or where the defendant resides, the legal system ensures that plaintiffs can pursue justice and that defendants have a fair opportunity to defend themselves.
The principle of venue in tort law refers to where a lawsuit can be brought and tried. This principle is based on the idea that a defendant should be able to defend themselves in a court that is convenient and accessible to them. The venue is typically determined by the location where the tort was committed or the defendant's residence.
To learn more about principle of venue, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29788120
#SPJ4
which of the following taxes are commonly assessed by state and/or local governments? (check all that apply.)
Taxes are commonly assessed by state and/or local governments
Property taxSales taxIncome taxWhat is the difference between state and local government?
Powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states and the people, and are divided between state and local governments. Most Americans interact with their state and local governments more frequently than they do with the federal government.
What are three positions in local or state government?
Governors, lieutenant governors, mayors, and city managers are examples of chief executives. District managers and revenue directors are examples of general and operations managers. Legislators include State senators and representatives, county commissioners, and city council members.
Learn more about local governments
https://brainly.com/question/22670499
#SPJ4
Full Question :which of the following taxes are commonly assessed by state and/or local governments? (check all that apply.)
Property tax
Sales tax
Income tax
Certainty
Sufficiency
Economy
in a criminal case the prosecutor has to prove that the defendant committed the offense. (True or False)
The prosecution is required to show the specifics of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt; the jury or magistrates should merely find the prisoner guilty.
Real judges or magistrates?Criminal, juvenile, and some civil cases are heard in magistrates' courts by district judges (district judges). They may be granted permission to participate in Family Court hearings. Some have the authority to handle terrorism investigations and extradition cases.
What authority do magistrates possess?Depending on the offense, magistrates have the authority to impose a variety of penalties, including limitless fines, prohibitions, community orders, and up to 12 months in jail. Learn more about the various penalty categories and the sentencing guidelines.
To know more about magistrates visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13523139
#SPJ4
identify and describe different intellectual developments from 1815-1850 and evaluate the ways in which they challenged the political and social order
Between 1815 and 1830, a number of connected and conflicting ideas rose to prominence. The rationalist politics that emerged included trade-union socialism (or social democracy), liberal reformism, and other political ideologies.
Exactly what does politics mean?
The group of activities known as politics include those that are connected to group decision-making and other types of inter-personnel power dynamics, such as the allocation of resources or status.
A strong foundation for effective citizenship is provided by political science. Students gain a solid understanding of the value of political engagement through studying political science, which also equips them with the skills necessary to participate in local and national politics.
Know more about ideologies Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28101659
#SPJ4
Which constitutional right was most directly violated by this executive order?a. Freedom of speechb. Right to equal protectionc. Right to bear armsd. Freedom of religion
Without knowing the specific executive order being referred to, it is difficult to determine which constitutional right was most directly violated.
a. Freedom of speech: The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right of individuals to freely express their views and opinions, including through speech, writing, and other forms of expression. b. Right to equal protection: The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires the government to treat all individuals equally and prohibits the government from denying equal protection of the laws to any person. c. Right to bear arms: The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense and for other lawful purposes. d. Freedom of religion: The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right of individuals to freely exercise their religious beliefs, including the right to worship as they choose and to express their religious views.
To learn more about constitutional right here
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
the articles of confederation did not give the people direct control over congress. who appointed members of congress?
The Articles of Confederation did not give the people any direct power over Congress. Members of the Constituent Assembly, the country that preceded the United States today
What is the Articles of Confederation's primary goal?The Articles of Confederation, which came into effect after the United States' pronouncement of independence from Britain, set forth the duties of the federal government.
Why did the Confederation Articles fail? What were they?The failure of the Constitutional Convention was ultimately caused by the fact that they were designed to keep the federal government as ineffective as plausible: there was no ability to enforce laws. no national courts or judicial branch. Amendments could only be approved by a unanimous vote.
To know more about Articles of Confederation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14516569
#SPJ4
the supreme expressions of the law at both federal and state levels of government _____ all other law is SUBORDINATE to fed. consitutional law.
The Supremacy Clause of a United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) declares that Constitution, federal legislation adopted in accordance with it, and treaties signed in accordance with its authority are indeed it supreme law of the land and supersede any competing state laws. A strong Federal Government was created by the Constitution.
Rights that are shared by the federal and state governments are referred to as concurrent powers. To replace these Articles of Confederation, they created a new document known as the Constitution. A strong Federal Government was created by the Constitution. Highest court. In the majority of the states, there is an appellate court. It is the ultimate appeal court and court of the last resort in the federal judiciary and most states. A political system known as dual federalism, often referred to as layer-cake federalisation or split sovereignty, divides authority between the state and federal governments in a precise manner.
Learn more about government
https://brainly.com/question/13540610
#SPJ4
this sign means be extra careful not to run off of the pavement drive on the shoulders when meeting wide trucks watch for soft spots in the roadway
Keep an eye out for soft patches in the road. Whenever you encounter wide trucks, drive on the shoulder. Pay close attention to avoid running off the pavement.
Do iron-on patches last forever?
An iron-on patch will typically stay in place for about 25 washes, which is plenty for many jackets, trousers, and bags. To apply your patches in a way that is more durable, you must sew them in.
Are patches still purchased today?
They are in right now. The 90s are quite hot right now, and patches are retro and very 90s. People would be fascinated if you post pictures of your patches styled in various ensembles on social media.
know more about attention:
https://brainly.com/question/26181728
#SPJ4
a case in which a court states the issue in a procedural context is not useful because the case does not address any substantive issues. (True or False)
The statement '' A case in which a court establishes a procedural issue is moot because the case does not address a substantive issue '' is False .
A narrowly defined problem does not help when writing or examining the problem. Determining the nature of the cause of action usually does not require investigation. The elements necessary to establish the cause of action can be found by searching for secondary authorities. A dispute is a statement of law that a court must answer to determine which party wins.
Essentially, legal research is the process you use to identify and find the law, including statutes, regulations and court decisions, that apply to the facts of your case. In most cases, the purpose of legal research is to find support for a particular legal issue or decision.
To know more about substantive issue visit :
https://brainly.com/question/18884058
#SPJ4
What is the National Advisory Terrorism System?
The National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) advisory informs public and government agencies about terrorist threats by providing detailed information in a timely manner.
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government or its citizens to pursue a particular political or social objective. Law enforcement generally recognizes two types of her terrorism .
The purpose of alerts and warnings is to warn the public, provide them with the information they need to take necessary actions to keep people safe, and to communicate messages to those at risk of imminent threats. is protective behavior .
To know more about National Advisory Terrorism System visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30245828
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. although james madison personally did not believe that the tenth amendment was necessary, he urged that it be adopted.
The statement is False. James Madison believed that the Tenth Amendment was necessary and advocated for its adoption.
Madison was one of the main authors of the United States Constitution and is widely considered the "Father of the Constitution." He was a strong supporter of federalism and believed that the Tenth Amendment, which defines the federal government's powers and states, was crucial for preserving the balance of power between the two levels of government.
Madison argued that the amendment was necessary to protect the states from federal overreach and to ensure that the federal government was limited in its powers to those specifically delegated to it by the Constitution.
To learn more about Madison, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/9594653
#SPJ4
while walking down a city street, the plaintiff was seriously injured when a rotten limb fell off of a tree and hit him on the head. the tree was located on a vacant lot next to the defendant's house. the lot appeared to be a part of the defendant's property. the plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages for his injuries, alleging that the defendant was negligent with respect to the care of the tree. the defendant's defense was that he did not own the lot or the tree, and that both the lot and the tree were the property of the city. at trial, the plaintiff calls a witness to testify that shortly after the plaintiff was taken to the hospital, he observed the defendant cutting down the rotten limbs on a number of trees on the vacant lot. should the witness's testimony be admitted?
The witness's testimony is most likely to be Admissible, to help prove that the defendant owned the lot.
Any tangible objects or statements of fact that can be presented to a court as a way to verify the veracity of a particular claim under inquiry are considered evidence. A primary responsibility of courts is to conduct proper proceedings in order to hear and examine evidence in order for court rulings to be founded on truth supported by evidence. The so-called law of evidence is mostly composed of procedural rules governing how facts are proved and presented, whether by witness testimony, the presentation of papers or tangible objects, or the invocation of a foreign law.
Learn more about evidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/21428682
#SPJ4
how could congress raise money under the articles of confederation?
The only ways that Congress could raise money were by asking the states for assistance, borrowing money from foreign nations, and selling western territory.
Who is recognized as an official from a foreign government?(1) (A) The term "foreign official" refers to any officer or employee of a foreign government, or of any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, or of a public international organization, as well as to any person acting in an official capacity on behalf of any such government or department, agency, or instrumentality.
What kind of official would that be?The police and other security services, such as immigration and border control, are examples of foreign public authorities. They also include local government members and officials.
To know more about foreign government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28083530
#SPJ4
stands for the idea that courts should interpret the constitution only according to the intentions of those who wrote it. question 17 options: constitutional holding dicta legal realism constitutional relativity originalis
The term that stands for the idea that courts should interpret the Constitution only according to the intentions of those who wrote it is "originalism."
Originalism is a conservative interpretive philosophy that holds that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the original intent of its framers. According to this view, the words and phrases of the Constitution have a fixed and unchanging meaning, and courts should not interpret the Constitution in a way that would alter or expand its original meaning. In contrast, other interpretive philosophies, such as legal realism or constitutional relativity, argue that the Constitution should be interpreted in light of contemporary circumstances and changing social, economic, and political conditions. These philosophies emphasize the dynamic nature of the Constitution and the need for courts to adapt its interpretation to reflect evolving societal norms and values.
To learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
Does one branch of government have more power than the others?
Explanation:
Because each branch has both individual and shared powers, no one branch has more authority than the other two, and each is accountable to the others. This "checks and balances" system means that the balance of power in our government remains steady.
A state that imposes a higher rate of tax on out-of-state companies than it does for in-state companies simply to protect the local companies from out-of-state competition is probably violating the _____________ clause of the Constitution.Full Faith and CreditSeparation of PowersEqual ProtectionSupremacy
A state that imposes a higher rate of tax on out-of-state companies than it does for in-state companies simply to protect the local companies from out-of-state competition is probably violating the supremacy clause of the Constitution
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) states that the Constitution, federal laws enacted under it, and treaties concluded under its authority constitute the "supreme Law of the Land," and thus take precedence over any conflicting state laws.
It states that state courts are bound by the supreme law, and state constitutions are subordinate to it. Federal statutes and treaties, on the other hand, must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be in accordance with the enumerated powers of the federal government and not violate other constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights—of particular interest is the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it.
Learn more about supremacy clause
https://brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
Which of the following are ways that media consumers can be certain that the information they are receiving is accurate?
A.) by relying on media that comport to their political leanings
B.) by not obtaining news from Internet sources
C.) By checking on news sources independently
D.) by relying on media outlets with a track record of adhering to journalistic standards
E.) by accepting whatever is broadcast or printed as fact
Media consumers can be certain that information they are receiving is accurate C.) By checking on news sources independently D.) by relying on media outlets with a track record of adhering to journalistic standards.
As consumers and creators of media, we can acquire important behaviours. We must comprehend the processes by which people produce digital media. We must also comprehend how different parties use the media to inform, sway, and even manipulate the rest of us. Even reputable media outlets can make errors, and false information abounds on social media. So, we must approach everything with scepticism. The media plays a key role in raising public understanding of the laws that apply to consumers and their place in the marketplace. The public is made aware of consumer regulations by government marketing and current events involving them. The government and numerous NGOs run media-based awareness campaigns.
Learn more about media consumers here:
https://brainly.com/question/29681217
#SPJ4
the ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called . group of answer choices statutes stare decisis torts jurisprudence the rule of law
The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called jurisprudence.
Jurisprudence is the examination of the knowledge of the law. Jurisprudence's study of law focuses on the law as a whole, as well as its principles, principles, and underlying philosophies, rather than on any particular statute or rule.
Jurisprudence offers the theoretical foundation for legal principles. It helps us recognize legal errors and provides us with a thorough comprehension of the legal notion. It improves the efficiency of legislators, judges, jurists, solicitors, and law students while teaching legal reasoning.
Dean Roscoe Pound defined jurisprudence as "the art of law, utilizing the name law there in a forensic sense, that designating the collection of principles recognized or enforced by courts or other governing organizations."
Learn more about jurisprudence here:
https://brainly.com/question/14612573
#SPJ4
Complete question:
the ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called
A. statutes
B. stare decisis
C. torts
D. jurisprudence
E. the rule of law
The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, "the power to tax involves the power to destroy."
The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. This is the case of McCulloch v. Maryland.
The Act of April 10th, 1816, ch. 44, to "incorporate the subscribers to the Bank of the United States," is a constitutional statute.
The Union Government, despite its limited powers, is paramount within its field of action, and its laws, when issued in accordance with the Constitution, become the supreme law of the land.
There is nothing in the United States Constitution that is equivalent to the Articles of Confederation in terms of excluding incidental or implicit powers.
If the aim is legal and within the scope of the Constitution, all appropriate, clearly fitted to that end, and not forbidden means may be constitutionally employed to carry it out.
To know more about McCulloch v. Maryland:
https://brainly.com/question/546157
#SPJ4
Correct question:
The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, "the power to tax involves the power to destroy." Which case is this?
Which of the following requires state governments to spend their own money to meet standards imposed on them by the federal government?
a. categorical grants
b. block grants
c. program grants
d. formula grants
e. unfunded mandates
A correct answer is an option (e), i.e., unfunded mandates. Unfunded mandates are federal requirements imposed on state and local governments without providing funding to cover the cost of complying with these requirements.
This means that state governments must spend their own resources to meet the standards imposed by the federal government without receiving financial assistance to do so. On the other hand, categorical, block, program, and formula grants are forms of federal financial assistance provided to state and local governments to help them carry out specific programs and activities.
These grants come with specific conditions and requirements, but they also provide funding to help states meet them. Unfunded mandates burden state and local budgets, while grants provide funding to support specific programs and activities.
To learn more about unfunded mandates, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13038480
#SPJ4
which of the following scenarios illustrates an action that would be protected by the free exercise clause in the first amendment?
Wearing a necklace bearing a Christian cross to work would be considered an action protected by the free exercise clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
This clause protects the right of individuals to freely exercise their religion and prohibits the government from interfering with religious practices, as long as they do not cause harm to others.
In this scenario, wearing a Christian cross as a form of religious expression would be considered a protected religious practice, and an employer would not be able to prohibit an employee from doing so, unless there is a compelling reason to do so, such as a legitimate health and safety concern.
To know more about first amendment
brainly.com/question/341077
#SPJ4
which of the following most likely contributed to the increase in immigration from southern and eastern europe referred to in the excerpt?
widespread poverty and religious intolerance in European nations. Both Americans and immigrants' cultures were influenced in different ways by immigration.
Segregation, indentured servants, convict renting, an increase in the propagation of racist ideologies, widespread lynch mobs (well almost 3,500 African Americans have been hanged between 1882 as well as 1968), and a lack of economic and social opportunities in the South were the main causes of migration among African Americans in the South. People immigrated to the United States in search of economic opportunity, political and religious freedom, and safety from conflict. 2. Both Americans and immigrants' cultures were influenced in different ways by immigration. Between 1870 and 1900, the U.S. population was nearly doubled by immigrants. People from many different countries made the decision to leave their homeland to immigrate to the U.s. In the late 1800s. Facing agricultural failure, a lack of land and jobs, and rising taxation.
Learn more about immigration
https://brainly.com/question/13889266
#SPJ4
A hotel with a revolving door will be liable for all injuries that result from its use unless an attendant is on duty to oversee its use.True or False
False. A hotel with a revolving door will be liable for the all injuries that result from its use unless an attendant is on the duty to oversee its use.
When A Hotel Is Liable for Injuries?According to the legal definition of duty of care, each individual or organization is required to act responsibly in order to prevent harm to others. A driver owes it to others to drive safely, which includes abiding by the law and not texting and driving.
A pedestrian on a sidewalk has a responsibility to act in a way that keeps them safe from danger from passing automobiles. A hotel owes a duty of care to its visitors, staff, and customers. It must take action to prevent harm or mishaps that can be foreseen with reasonable certainty.
To know more about hotel visit
brainly.com/question/30413709
#SPJ4
some canadian troops are sent (as part of a u.n. peacekeeping force) to a country located on the earth's equator. at night, when homesickness makes them gaze sleeplessly at the stars, which of the following will be familiar to them (the same at the equator as in canada):
The rotation of the earth is not as simple as a spherical just revolving. The earth's rotation is tilted at an angle of 23.5° relative to our orbital plane, the plane of the earth's orbit around the sun, due to the shape of the earth,
Which is best described as gelid; spherical but slightly flattened at the poles, some gravitational forces acting on the earth, and the presence of seasons.
The celestial north and south poles are the north and south poles on the tilted earth's rotating axis when it is taken into account.
The equator on the tilted earth that is projected into space to be equally far from the celestial north and south poles is known as the celestial equator. The heavenly equator crosses a section of the actual equator.
For such more question on rotation.
https://brainly.com/question/1808956
#SPJ4
the ___ are the documents the parties file with the court when they first state their respective claims and defenses.
The documents that parties file with the court when they first state their respective claims and defenses are called pleadings.
Pleadings are the formal written statements submitted by each party in a lawsuit, which outline their claims and defenses. They serve as the foundation of a case and provide the court and opposing parties with a clear understanding of what each side is claiming and why.
There are two types of pleadings in a typical lawsuit: the complaint and the answer. The complaint is the document filed by the plaintiff or the person bringing the lawsuit, which outlines their claims and the relief they seek. The answer is the document filed by the defendant, which responds to the allegations made in the complaint and sets out any defenses they may have.
To learn more about pleadings, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
select the states whose constitutions are over 80,000 words in length and have more than 300 amendments.
No US state has a constitution with over 80,000 words in length. The longest state constitution is that of Alabama, which has over 38,000 words but less than 300 amendments.
The length of a state's constitution can vary greatly, with some constitutions being just a few pages long while others are more extensive. Alabama's constitution, considered one of the longest state constitutions in the United States, has over 38,000 words. However, it has fewer than 300 amendments, so it does not meet the criteria specified in the original question.
In general, the length and complexity of a state's constitution reflect its political and cultural history, as well as its unique governing needs and priorities. Some states have included more detailed provisions in their constitutions, while others have opted for more concise, streamlined documents. Regardless of length, all state constitutions play a crucial role in defining the framework of government and the rights of citizens in each state.
To learn more about the constitution, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/14398727
#SPJ4
what will happen to the volume of a sealed object held at a constant temperature when the pressure is decreased?
Boyle's law, that states that now the volume of the gas is inversely linked to its pressure under conditions of constant temperature, describes this behavior.
What does Boyle's law mean in plain English?Boyle's Law is an essential chemistry principle that describes how a gas behaves when it is kept at a constant heat flux. The code stipulates that at a stable temperature, the size of a gas is inversely related to the pressure it exerts (Robert A. Boyle discovered this law in 1662).
What is the fundamental idea behind Boyle's law?According to Boyle's law, at a specific temperature, a gas's pressure and volume are inversely proportional.
To know more about Boyle's law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1437490
#SPJ4
a three-car accident occurred in which the drivers were a citizen of state a, a citizen of state b, and a citizen of state c. the state a citizen filed a negligence action against the other two in federal district court and lost his case. after judgment, may the state c citizen assert and maintain a negligence action against the state b citizen seeking damages for the injuries the state c citizen sustained in the same accident?
The court should rule on the State C defendant's motion to dismiss for improper venue Grant the motion, because the motion is timely and venue is improper.
A motion is a legal procedure used in American law to ask a court to rule on a specific, contentious issue. It is a request for a ruling on the case from the judge (or judges). Motions may be filed at any stage in administrative, criminal, or civil proceedings, albeit this right is subject to local court regulations. The party requesting the motion is sometimes referred to as the moving party or just the movant. The nonmoving party or nonmovant is the party that is opposed to the motion. In the United States, courts typically lack the ability to execute themselves.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28375470
#SPJ4
a plan to satisfy southern fears that the federal government might be funded through export duties
a strategy to allay Southern concerns that export tariffs would be used to pay for the federal government Compromise in Trade and Slave Trade
What constitutes the federal government?The legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal government are successively vested with authority by the U.S. Constitution in Congress, the President, and the Federal courts. This includes the power to pass legislation regulating business, mint money, declare war, assemble and sustain an army, and establish a post office.
Why is a national government beneficial?Federalism encourages political engagement. Federalism promotes economic equity throughout the nation. Federalism allows for several governmental tiers. Federalism allows for a range of viewpoints.
To know more about federal government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11850953
#SPJ4
firms are typically more successful when they focus on opportunities that build on their strengths relative to those of their competition.
a. true
b. false
True. Businesses that concentrate on opportunities that capitalize on their advantages over the competition are usually more successful than businesses that do not.
What in economics are firms?A company, such as a corporation, is a business organization that manufactures and sells services and goods with the intention of generating income and turning a profit.
What is a company or a firm?A firm is a business that makes a profit by offering products and services, typically consulting services. By contrast hand, a firm is a company that wants to engage in any interaction that brings in money through into the sale of either goods or services, including all business structures and trades.
To know more about firms visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28326504
#SPJ4
when adding a generalization as an implicit premise in an argument, add a true wide generalization rather than a true narrow one, and add a true narrow generalization rather than. . .
The given statement is False. In an argument, a generalization can serve as an implicit premise, meaning that it is assumed to be true without being explicitly stated. When adding a generalization as an implicit premise, it is important to consider its accuracy and scope.
A true wide generalization refers to a statement that is generally true for a large number of cases but may not apply to every specific case. For example, "most people enjoy listening to music" is a wide generalization. Adding a true wide generalization as an implicit premise can provide a strong foundation for the argument, as it covers a large number of cases and increases the likelihood that the conclusion will follow logically from the premises.
On the other hand, a true narrow generalization refers to a statement only true for a specific, limited set of cases. For example, "all birds can fly" is a true narrow generalization, but not all birds can fly, such as penguins. When adding a true narrow generalization as an implicit premise, the argument may be stronger in specificity but weaker in terms of the number of cases it covers.
To learn more about generalization, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/12841996
#SPJ4