The supreme court decided on the commerce clause of the constitution, limiting Congress' authority to employ the commerce clause to address national concerns.
What is a supreme court?Supreme court, refers to the highest court of justice which ensures people to receive the justice in the eyes of the law. The court act as protector and interpretation of the constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled on the constitution's commerce clause, restricting Congress' ability to use the section to address national problems.
Therefore, it can be concluded that commerce clause to address national concerns.
Learn more about supreme court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
Dr. Shipman’s detention in the Wakefield Prison in West Yorkshire England is an example of which component of the criminal justice system ______________________.
a.
Courts
b.
Police
c.
Lawyers
d.
Corrections
Based on the details of the scenario, determine what will most likely occur. lincoln has been taking advantage of benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, benson seeks relief and legal freedom from his contract.
Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, Benson seeks relief and legal freedom from his contract. In this scenario, it is most likely that the contract is voided.
An unfair contract demonstrates a contract in which the rights of one of the participating contracting parties are adversely disrupted. If a contract is unfair or unjust to one contracting party in a way that denotes abuses during its formation, the court may find it to declare the contract as unconscionable and deny enforcing it. Thus, unfair contracts are declared to be void. A void contract means a contract that is entirely illegitimate and unenforceable.
Under the United States overview, "unconscionability" denotes that a term in the contract was shockingly unfair. As a result of this, the contract cannot be allowed to stand as is. However, if a court does find a contract unfair, it has got options other than just voiding it entirely. The fair parts of the contract can be enforced, and the unfair parts can be rewritten.
Learn more about void contracts at:
brainly.com/question/24766316
#SPJ4
Research to find an example of the supremacy clause coming up in a conflict between state & federal law. Explain the basis of the case and resolution.
The sale of blue soda pop in vending machines by a nearby food and beverage seller is accused of breaking the law.
She can argue that the state legislation violates the U.S. Supremacy Clause since it conflicts with federal law and is consequently preempted by it. Constitution.
What is the effect of the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution?In the end, the Constitution's Supremacy Clause proves that the document is the supreme law of the land. This provision shall have precedence over any conflicting law or matter. This section also appears under the "Supremacy" heading for all federal laws.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) declares that the Constitution, federal legislation adopted in accordance with it, and treaties signed in accordance with its authority are the "supreme Law of the Land" and supersede any conflicting state laws.
Learn more about the Supremacy Clause here:
https://brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
Which case expanded the role of judge as gatekeeper to a much wider range of evidence?.
Answer:
(“In Daubert the Court charged trial judges with the responsibility of acting as gatekeepers to exclude unreliable expert testimony, and the Court in Kumho clarified that this gatekeeper function applies to all expert testimony, not just testimony based in science.”).
Explanation:
is this what you were looking for?
What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.
2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments. Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.
What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:
Prevent terrorismEnhance securitySecure and manage U.S. bordersEnforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.
Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:
Border securityAviation securityCountering terrorismEmergency responseChemical facility inspectionIT and cybersecurity securityNatural disaster planning and response.Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.
Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at https://brainly.com/question/19521614
#SPJ1
a case from the supreme court of north carolina is published in which west reporter?
What is the significance of the 2010 supreme court decision citizens united v. Federal election commission?.
Answer:
Citizens United v. FEC
Article Talk
Language
Watch
Edit
"Citizens United" redirects here. For the political organization, see Citizens United (organization). For other uses, see Citizens United (disambiguation).
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It was argued in 2009 and decided in 2010. The court held 5-4 that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
The Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. FEC that corporations are people and abolished sensible political donation caps, allowing a select few wealthy donors and special interests to utilize dark money to sway elections.
Why was the Federal Election Commission created?For the purpose of overseeing and upholding the Federal Election Campaign Act, the Federal Election Commission was founded in 1975. The sources and sums of contributions that can be used to support federal elections are restricted by this law, and it also mandates that the sources and use of all contributions be made public.
The Federal Election Commission ruled that companies could be prohibited from using political advertisements. For independent expenditures and electioneering communications, the Court affirmed the reporting and disclaimer requirements. The prohibition on corporate contributions was unaffected by the Court's decision.
Learn more about the united v. Federal election commission here:
https://brainly.com/question/20364118
#SPJ4
What is the judge's role in jury deliberations? (Select all that apply.)
The judge is available to answer questions of law during deliberations.
None. Once the trial is sent to the jury, the judge has no responsibilities.
The judge guides the jury on legal questions while they are deliberating.
The judge gives instructions to the jury to help them during their deliberations.
Answer: Working Together: Judge and Jury
Explanation: The judge determines the appropriate law that should be applied to the case and the jury finds the facts in the case based on what is presented to them during the proceedings. At the end of a trial, the judge instructs the jury on the applicable law.
There are many teenagers who would like to work at gas stations, but they are not hired due to minimum-wage laws. True or false?.
Answer:false
Explanation:
Which statement describes the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor?
Question 5 options:
A felony can result in jail time, while a misdemeanor results only in fines.
A felony is a serious crime, while a misdemeanor is a relatively minor offense.
A felony is a violation of criminal law, while a misdemeanor is a violation of civil law.
A felony causes injury to a person, while a misdemeanor causes injury to property.
The statement that describes the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor is that a felony can result in jail time while a misdemeanor results only in fines.
What are felonies and misdemeanours?Both the felonies and misdemeanours are a class of minor offenses that may be described as petty offenses or quasi-crimes before the law. These offenses are created by local ordinance or by regulatory statute, and the requirement of trial by jury does not apply.
Most time, the felony is defined as a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment of one year or more while the Misdemeanours are often defined as offenses punishable only by fines or by short terms of imprisonment in local jails.
Read more about felonies
brainly.com/question/20348390
#SPJ1
A goal of the forensic investigator is to secure and document the crime scene while minimizing changes to crime scene evidence. True or false?.
Answer: True
Explanation:
In ______ states, there are more daily newspapers paying attention to policy and educational matters than in individualistic states.
In Moralistic states, there are more daily newspapers paying attention to policy and educational matters than in individualistic states.
The US States are cut down into three different categories namely the moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic.
Moralistic states are states which believe that the government should be active in promoting the public good and that citizens should participate in politics and gain civic duties. These are states settles by the puritans and northern Europeans.Concentrated in New England, Upper Midwest and West.Brings people together on the same line for a better understanding and working Moralistic culture works best for policy analysisTo know more about US states:
brainly.com/question/11192340
#SPJ4
This week we learned that most sheriffs are elected and most police chiefs are appointed. Do you believe chiefs should be elected as well? Or both sheriffs and chiefs appointed? Should law enforcement be tied to politics through an election at all? Explain your answer.
1. The election of police chiefs is good for democracy as it allows the people to participate in selecting the head of this important government agency or department.
2. It is also necessary to elect sheriffs, who are county heads of law enforcement. Sheriffs' elections will guarantee better performance.
3. Law enforcement is not tied to politics through the election of the police chief and the sheriff. Instead, their election removes them from politics, especially when they are not contesting under any political party.
Why it is necessary to elect police chiefs?The election of police chiefs by the electorate involves the general voting public to determine the level and use of force to keep the community safe.
This system is a democratic process for the people in the community are involved in choosing who gets elected for law enforcement.
Election removes the position of the chief of police from the political manipulations of the politicians.
Thus, the election of the chief of police ensures that the best resident is chosen for the job, irrespective of their academic qualifications and political affiliations.
Learn more about elections for police chiefs at https://brainly.com/question/13868604
#SPJ1
Which amendment would someone most likely use to argue that people should be allowed to own guns?.
the Second Amendment would be someone presumably used to argue that people should be allowed to own guns.
Under U.S. Constitution, The Second Amendment ensures the proper of the people to keep and bear arms, after the setting, the aim , and therefore the objectives of the draftsmen who can't understand the clause,the second amendment guarantees that a well regulated Militia, being important for the security of a free State, the proper of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, the need for state militia predicated as a right gurantee, as so to guard the state while not its purpose is different, Since American has the proper to protect their homes, and nobody can undermine their right. it's desirable for the state for having reasonable regulations for the ownership and the usage of a firearm in an effort to stop mindless homicidal carnage.
To know more about the Second Amendment refer to the link brainly.com/question/8244125?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
DISCUSS THE CONCEPT OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR USING YOUR OWN WORDS.
Answer:
want different life roles
What is the specific legal problem with this argument?
Answer:
what argument
Explanation:
you didn't include it
Question 5 of 10
what are two broad categories of tort remedies?
a. damages and writs
b. temporary and permanent injunctions
c. damages and compensation
d. damages and injunctions
Damages and compensation are two broad categories of tort remedies. Damages are granted for bodily harm, whereas compensation is on a higher level. Compensation seeks to put the injured party in the same situation as if the injury had not occurred by providing monetary compensation for the harm done.
While 'damages' categories refers to compensation awarded or sought, 'damage' refers to the hurt or loss for which compensation is claimed or awarded. 'Damage' can relate to monetary or non-monetary compensation , whereas 'damages' refer to monetary recompense. Payment or reward for work or services provided, or for injury incurred, is referred to as compensation.
To learn more about categories, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8866495
#SPJ4
2. You want to test the idea that people are more likely to help others of their own race. You want to conduct an experiment where you will stage a kidnapping in front of a busy store to see who will seek help for the “victim.” You will manipulate whether the person posing as the victim is of European or African descent. What are the ethical issues involved? If you were a member of the IRB, what questions would you ask of the researchers? Do you think such an experiment would be ethical? Can you design an experiment that tests the same idea but raises fewer ethical issues?
The ethical problems involved in this experiment are: Racism, violence, complicity, among others. Additionally, this experiment would not be ethical because it simulates a dangerous situation that can modify people's behavior without indicating whether they disapprove or consent to racism.
What ethical issues are involved in this experiment?Different ethical aspects are involved in this experiment because they question citizens about what is considered "good actions" and "bad actions". Among them are complicity with a criminal act, racism and violence.
What position do I take if I belong to the IRB?As a member of the IRB (Institutional review board) it would have the function of reviewing the ethics of the research carried out. In the case of this research, you should take into account if it violates any ethical principle and question the researchers about the research:
Is the method adequate to establish a true and faithful conclusion?What alternative situations allow us to obtain the same or similar results?How to get the results of this social experiment?alternative experimentAn alternative experiment would be creating a situation of discrimination or bullying towards a European and an African descent. IN this we will be able to evaluate the incidence of people in the situation to help the victim according to their origin.
Learn more about discrimination in: https://brainly.com/question/24667174
#SPJ1
The issue of unemployment and declining wages on the west coast led to which of the legislative actions?.
The issue of unemployment and declining wages on the west coast led to Dawes, Homestead act of the legislative actions.
Industrialization created low-wage, low-skill jobs with workers who can be replaced easily. overproduction leading to low prices for products and debt for farmers. Schools promoted the employment and study of diverse languages. Schools allowed for various legislative actions culture groups to measure more closely.
Knights of Labor were members were skilled and unskilled workers, rallied for shorter work days, equal legislative actions get men and ladies, and to finish child labor. Its founding marked the start of union activism within the era.
The Knights however declined in status thanks to being associated to the Haymarket bombing, and therefore the legislative actions proven fact that they allowed in unskilled workers, giving the skilled workers a sense of superiority. Americanization Movement. This movement was sponsored by the govt. and anxious citizens.
learn more about legislative actions: https://brainly.com/question/11821265
#SPJ4
Ano ang kahulugan ng talos-tanod
Answer:
Here is the answer..
TALOS-TANOD
What are the social and economic implications of an aging society?
Answer:It affects labor markets, patterns of saving and consumption, families and households, networks and social interaction
Explanation: Brainliest
can a person belong to more than one culture, or are they neglecting their original identity when adapting to a new culture?
Yes a person can belong to more than one culture. Multiple cultural identities may be encouraged or required by people's lived experiences, either freely or unintentionally.
More about Culture and identity:
Our feeling of cultural identity helps us feel connected. We seek out people whose worldviews, attitudes, and practises align with our own in order to build relationships and win their acceptance.
Global cultural variety and intergroup contact are growing as a result of modernization, migration, and interethnic/religious marriages. Many people may have ancestries that incorporate more than one cultural background as a result of this increased cultural contact.
Learn more about Culture and identity here:
https://brainly.com/question/5591199
#SPJ9
Paula could not reach an agreement with the irs at her appeals conference and has just received a 90-day letter. If she wants to litigate the issue but does not have sufficient cash to pay the proposed deficiency, what is her best court choice?.
Answer:She's should ask for appeal
Explanation:
brainliest
analyze the impact of gender based violence on individual or community
Answer:
lower productivity and thus reduced economic output and growth, and increased pressure on social and health services.
Explanation:
A private nuisance occurs when a person permanently removes personal property from the owner’s possession and control. True or false?.
It is false, that A private nuisance occurs when a person permanently removes personal property from the owner’s possession and control.
When a person permanently removes personal property from the owner's possession and control that occurs in conversion, the owner recovers the damages of the converted item for the full value, even possession of stolen goods makes it liable. While private nuisance occurs when the enjoyment and plaintiff's use of his or her property is disturbed unreasonably through an activity or thing and public nuisance occurs when the person is been interfered unreasonably with the right that the general public share equally in common.
To know more about private nuisnace and public nuisance refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/17751112?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
What are the various ways investigators locate and identify fingerprints at a crime scene?
Answer: One of the most common methods for discovering and collecting latent fingerprints is by dusting a smooth or nonporous surface with fingerprint powder (black granular, aluminum flake, black magnetic, etc.). If any prints appear, they are photographed as mentioned above and then lifted from the surface with clear adhesive tape. The lifting tape is then placed on a latent lift card to preserve the print.
However, fingerprint powders can contaminate the evidence and ruin the opportunity to perform other techniques that could turn up a hidden print or additional information. Therefore, investigators may examine the area with an alternate light source or apply cyanoacrylate (super glue) before using powders.
Explanation:
Source: https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/prints/how.html
Because the expedited irb review process is generally used for certain types of minimal risk research, it is less stringent than review by the full irb. True or false?.
the statement given: Because the expedited IRB review process is generally used for certain types of minimal risk research, it is less stringent than review by the full is a false statement .
Because the expedited IRB review process is used especially for certain types of minimal risk research,it is less strict than the review done by the full IRB. To the individual research subjects, the research participation must provide a tangible benefit in order to be approved according to the regulations.The IRB operates an initial pre-review screening process, during the process an analyst of IRB reviews individuals' submissions for compliance and completeness, and the analyst may suggest making changes before it is submitted to the IRB .
To know more about the IRB process refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/14353183?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
Discribe how the following concepts could help to fight social challenges :social and environmental responsibility
Social and environmental responsibility can combat social concerns by contributing in their resolution. When an individual or a group takes on the responsibility of protecting society and the environment, it can help to alleviate social problems. Many people and corporations, for example, organize food drives to combat poverty. Economic activities grow in a stable community with a good environmental atmosphere, which is why social and environmental responsibility may help fight poverty.
Environmental and social responsibility considers issues of people, planet, and profit that contribute to long-term competitive advantage. Developing socially responsible and sustainable employment practices assists companies in meeting current demands while preserving their potential to fulfil future requirements.
To learn more about Environmental, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/21976584
#SPJ4
How do you sign up to be an organ donor right in the two different ways to do it
Identify one deficient aspect of Pakistani law or any aspect of the legal system that you disagree with. Explain your reasoning and lay out a framework for how you would resolve it.
One poor thing about Pakistani regulation or any component of the legal system that you disagree with: Many people within the united states of America are unhappy with the Judicial gadget u. s .. they have got misplaced religion within the judicial machine of Pakistan.
A legal system is a procedure or process for deciphering and enforcing the regulation. The 3 foremost legal structures of the world consist of civil law, common law, and spiritual law. other legal structures are: Jury device is a felony device for determining the information at the difficulty in a lawsuit.
A quick Primer on the world's legal system
There are normally considered to be five criminal systems in the international these days: civil regulation, commonplace law, normal law, spiritual law, and blended felony systems. Civil regulation systems have their starting place inside the Roman prison way of life.
As attorneys recognize, the legal systems in international locations around the arena generally fall into certainly one of the fundamental classes: not unusual regulation systems and civil law systems.
Learn more about the legal system here: https://brainly.com/question/7694457
#SPJ9