'Individuals are most likely to obey when demands are made by a A close friend physically attractive individual legitimate authority subordinate colleague of similar rank.
Explain Demand Curve?The amount demanded for a commodity is determined by its price as well as many other factors, including the prices of other commodities, consumer income and tastes, and seasonal impacts. All parameters except the commodity price are frequently held constant in basic economic analysis; the analysis then comprises assessing the link between various price levels and the greatest quantity that consumers may theoretically purchase at each of those prices. Price-quantity combinations can be shown on a curve called a demand curve, with price on the vertical axis and quantity on the horizontal axis.
To know more about Demand visit:
brainly.com/question/29892538
#SPJ4
Demands issued by a legitimate authority are those that people will most likely comply with.
Why does someone obey?In real-world circumstances, people follow orders out of a desire to be rewarded, a desire to avoid the bad effects of disobeying, and a conviction that the person in charge is legitimate. In increasingly dire circumstances, people nevertheless comply even when forced to go against their morals or break the law.For instance, if the teacher asks the class to choose between extra recess, no homework, or candy, the majority of the students will follow the majority's lead once a few have voted. If the majority voted differently in a different classroom, the vast majority of students would follow that decision.Demands issued by a legitimate authority are those that people will most likely comply with.To learn more about Demands refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1245771
#SPJ1
A plaintiff and a defendant were involved in a car accident in the middle of an intersection. A police officer arrived, and after the officer took down all the basic information of both drivers and spoke with eyewitnesses and the two parties, the defendant said to the officer, "I ran a red light." The officer recorded this statement in his police report. The defendant also said to the plaintiff, "Don't worry, I have car insurance." During a trial for negligence, the plaintiff attempts to admit both statements against the defendant.
Which of the defendant's statements are admissible?
Both statements
Neither statement
Only the statement regarding car insurance
Only the statement regarding running the red light
Only the statement regarding running the red light. This statement of the defendant is admissible.
Despite the fact that a police report may fall under the business records exception, a witness' statement that appears in the report normally does not because the witness is not speaking on behalf of the police. However, if the statement is provided by an opposing party, it may be considered an opposing party's statement, which is a statement made by a party to the ongoing dispute and is not hearsay. Given that the defendant made the statement in the police report, it would count as an opposing party's statement in this case.
Learn more about defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/3246553
#SPJ4
which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?
The Correct option (A) (B) ;The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the United States' federal judiciary. It has final appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law.
It also has original jurisdiction over a limited number of cases, including "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party."
The court has the power of judicial review, which allows it to invalidate a statute for violating a constitutional provision. It can also overturn presidential directives if they violate the Constitution or statutory law.
Learn more about supreme court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Full question which of the following is true of the conference that takes place after oral arguments in the supreme court?
The justices take a nonbinding vote.
A justice is assigned to draft the majority opinion.
the policy concerns of the population at large
the policy preferences of Congress
courts often use transcripts of the legislative hearings and debates that preceded a law's passage to determine the purpose and reach of a law. this background is called a law's legislative .
this background is called a law's legislative History.
Usually, they continue. One of a legislature's key duties is to discuss and debate issues that are extremely important to society. [1] This activity may occur in one of two ways. In debating legislatures, such as the British Parliament, the floor of the legislature regularly sees contentious debate. [1] In legislative with a committee system, like the US Congress, deliberation takes place in closed committees. Legislation While legislatures officially have the exclusive power to pass laws, the real reach of this power depends on the particulars of the political system. The cabinet, which makes up the administration, has essentially unrestricted power in
Learn more about legislative :
https://brainly.com/question/29804648
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. when a defendant who has been served wants to sue a plaintiff, the plaintiff becomes a___. question 10 options: counterplaintiff defendant appellee counterdefendant appellant
.When a defendant who has been served wants to sue a plaintiff, the plaintiff becomes a counterplaintiff Option (a)
The plaintiff is the party who files a lawsuit (also known as an action) in court. The plaintiff is seeking legal redress in this manner. If the search is successful, the court will enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and issue the necessary court orders .
"Plaintiff" is the term used in civil cases in most English-speaking jurisdictions, the notable exceptions being England and Wales, where a plaintiff has, since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules in 1999, been known as a "claimant" and Scotland, where the party has always been known as the "pursuer". In criminal cases, the prosecutor brings the case against the defendant, but the key complaining party is often called the "complainant".
Learn more about plaintiff
https://brainly.com/question/29213554
#SPJ4
voter participation in statewide constitutional amendment elections is most likely to see big increases under what circumstances?
Explanation:
Voter participation in statewide constitutional amendment elections is most likely to see big increases under the following circumstances:
High public interest and engagement in the amendment being proposed: When people are passionate about the issue at hand, they are more likely to go out and vote.
Effective and targeted outreach and mobilization efforts: Campaigns and organizations working to increase voter participation can have a significant impact by reaching out to groups that typically have lower voter turnout and encouraging them to participate.
Convenient and accessible voting options: Making voting more convenient and accessible, such as through early voting or online voting, can also increase voter participation.
Controversial or divisive amendments: Constitutional amendments that are controversial or generate significant public debate are more likely to drive people to the polls to have their say.
Competitive elections: Elections that are closely contested and have high stakes tend to drive up voter turnout, as people are more motivated to participate when they feel their vote will make a difference.
as a judge in france, maurice is not allowed to interpret the law but relies on a strict set of codes to determine the outcome of a case. which type of law is in place in france? group of answer choices common law system civil law system mixed law system tribal law system theocratic law system
As a judge in France, Maurice is not allowed to interpret the law but relies on a strict set of codes to determine the outcome of a case. A type of law that is in place in France is known as civil law system. The Option B is correct.
What does civil law system mean?Civil law systems, also known as continental or Romano-Germanic legal systems, are found on all continents and cover approximately 60% of the global territory. They are based on Roman law concepts, categories, and rules, with some influence from canon law, and are sometimes supplemented or modified by local custom or culture.
The civil law tradition, despite being secularized over the centuries and emphasizing individual freedom, promotes human cooperation. Civil law, in its technical, narrow sense, refers to the law that governs people, things, and the relationships that develop between them, excluding not only criminal law but also commercial law, labor law, and so on.
Read more about civil law system
brainly.com/question/15049771
#SPJ1
alli, a resident of alabama, has obtained a valid judgment against karson, a resident of kentucky. in this case:
In this case, Alli, a resident of Alabama, has obtained a valid judgment against Karson, who is a resident of Kentucky. This means that the court in Alabama has ruled in favor of Alli and issued a judgment against Karson.
To enforce this judgment, Alli may need to take additional legal steps in Kentucky, where Karson resides. The exact steps will depend on the laws of Kentucky and the case's specific details. A judgment is a court's official decision in a lawsuit. Once a judgment has been entered, the winning party (in this case, Alli) can enforce their rights and collect what is owed to them.
To enforce a judgment in Kentucky, Alli may need to register the Alabama judgment in Kentucky and then take further steps to collect what is owed, such as garnishing wages, seizing bank accounts, or selling assets. The exact steps will depend on Kentucky's specific laws and procedures and the specific details of the case.
To learn more about Karson, visit here.
https://brainly.com/question/14084465
#SPJ4
where a long-arm statute is present, a defendant need not have minimum contact with a state for that state's courts to have jurisdiction over the defendant. (True or False)
True. A long-arm statute is a law that allows a state's courts to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant who does not have minimum contact with that state.
The purpose of a long-arm statute is to allow a state to reach out and assert jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant who has engaged in actions that have sufficient minimum contacts with the state. This means that even if the defendant does not have a physical presence in the state, the state's courts may still have jurisdiction over them if they have engaged in actions that are sufficient to establish minimum contacts with the state.This implies that even if the defendant has no physicality in the state, the state's courts can nevertheless have jurisdiction over them if they've taken activities that are sufficient to create even a minimal amount of contact with the state.
To learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
Conflict Perspective:
According to conflict perspective, which system emerges after class conflict?
A. Capitalism
B. Socialism
C. Social Welfarism
D. None of the above
Marxism posits that the conflict between social classes—specifically between the bourgeoisie, or capitalists, and the proletariat, or workers—defines financial relations in a capitalist financial system and will lead inevitably to a communist revolution.
Which early theorist saw category hostilities as the major source of social change?Conflict theorists view society as an area of inequality that generates social combat and social change. Karl Marx is considered the father of social war theory. In doing so, he provided a theory of capitalism and category warfare between dominant and minority groups.
What is a social type conflict?Class conflict, also referred to as type combat and class warfare, is the political tension and economic antagonism that exists in society because of socio-economic competition amongst the social training or between prosperous and poor.
Learn more about emerges after class conflict here;
https://brainly.com/question/14144210
#SPJ4
what type of government does russia have and who is the leader
Russia is technically a federal democratic state and Putin is the president and the end of then state in Russia.
What is Russia?Eastern Europe and Northern Asia are both parts of the Russian Federation, a transcontinental nation. With an internationally recognised territory that spans 17,098,246 square kilometers (6,601,670 sq mi)—eighth of the habitable landmass of the planet—it is the largest country in the world. Russia spans eleven time zones and has territorial borders with 14 other nations. With a population of more than 147 million, it is both the most populous country in Europe and the tenth most populous country in the entire globe. Moscow is the nation's capital and largest metropolis. The second-largest city in Russia and its cultural hub is Saint Petersburg. Novosibirsk, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod, and Kazan are a few other significant cities.
To learn more about Russia visit:
https://brainly.com/question/898911
#SPJ4
what is the difference between your marginal and effective tax rates?
The marginal tax rate is the total tax rate applied to a person's entire taxable income, whereas the marginal tax rate is the rate applied to the last dollar of earnings.
How is the marginal tax rate determined?Finding the change in tax collected and dividing it by the transformation in tax liability is the formula for calculating the marginal tax rate.
Why is the marginal tax rate called that?Because your "marginal" income is what is taxed at the following highest tax bracket as you jump higher in tax brackets, this tax rate is known as the marginal tax rate. The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the actual owed taxes (as shown by the tax statements) by the reported pre-tax income of the company.
To know more about marginal tax rate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14435010
#SPJ4
as it pertains to employment opportunity, the eeo strives to ______.
As it pertains to employment opportunity, the EEO strives to give individuals an equal chance for employment.
What is equal employment opportunity?The fundamental concept of EEO (or equal employment opportunity) is that everyone should be treated fairly while being taken into account for different employment decisions (including hiring, promotion, termination, compensation, etc.). At every stage of the employee lifecycle, employers must abide by the laws governing equal employment opportunities. Discriminating against individuals when hiring, promoting, or letting go of them from your company based on their personal qualities such as color, gender, or religion is unfair and illegal.
Learn more on laws here:
brainly.com/question/30144373
#SPJ4
True or false: The Constitution does not provide a basis for a right to privacy
The Constitution does not provide a basis for a right to privacy - False
Despite the fact that the United States Constitution does not expressly mention privacy, Justice Louis D. Brandeis claimed in his dissent in Gilbert v. Minnesota (1920) that the First Amendment safeguarded a person's right to privacy in their own house.
The right to privacy is a fundamental right, according to the Supreme Court, which also ruled that other fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution, including the right to life and personal liberty, derive from this right. Although the right to privacy isn't mentioned in the Constitution directly, the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments have all been interpreted by the courts to establish a foundation for such a right.
Read more about Constitution on:
https://brainly.com/question/21235714
#SPJ4
a defendant was charged with the murder of her own child. two months prior to trial, the prosecutor interviewed a family friend who had known the defend
The trial court also came to the conclusion that both the gunshot and the footprints at the crime site matched those on the shoes that had been found on the accused.
What exactly is a conclusion example?
The conclusion example, which includes the thesis's concluding paragraph or sentence and a summary of its main points, completes the essay.
A strong conclusion will summarise your key ideas and points, bringing together all relevant data with an emotive appeal for a concluding remark that connects with your audience.
What do you want the reader to know or understand?Introduce that concept in one sentence. Summarize the main points of the text without using the exact same terms. One entire sentence should contain both the topic and your justification or assertion.
Know more about found Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20133764
#SPJ4
whether the Supreme Court has no role in constitutional revision
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to initiate a constitutional revision. This power lies with the legislative branch through the process of amending the Constitution.
It typically requires the approval of two-thirds of both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states. However, the Supreme Court plays a role in interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws, including any amendments to the Constitution.
The process of amending the U.S. Constitution is complex and requires a significant level of agreement across the country. The Constitution outlines the procedures for making amendments in Article V, which requires two-thirds of both houses of Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) to approve a proposed amendment. Once Congress approves an amendment, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states, either through their legislatures or state-level conventions.
To learn more Supreme Court, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Which ofthe following statements is NOT true aboutthe Articles of Confederation and the Constitution a The Great Compronise was necessary t0 directly address the key weaknesses ofthe Articles of Confederation_ The Articles of Confederation's promotion of state sovereignty would make it difficult to accomplish substantive national goals The Constitution needed to replace the confederation with republican system of govemment d. The Article of Confederation $ tax policies were necessary to limit the national govemment ad the Constitution honored that system
The correct answer is (d) d. The Article of Confederation's tax policies were necessary to limit the national government, and the Constitution honored that system is NOT true.
The Articles of Confederation did not have a strong central government, leading to problems with revenue collection and the ability to pay debts. The Constitution provided a stronger central government with the power to tax, which helped address these issues.
The Constitution also aimed to create a more balanced system of government between the states and the national government rather than simply honoring the principle of limited government embodied in the Articles of Confederation.
To learn more about the Articles of Confederation, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
which of the following is a microeconomic topic? what the government will do to address unemployment the effect of the budget deficit on the rate of interest reasons why inflation is rising reasons why a consumer buys more cheese
The study of individual economic agents, such as households and businesses, and how they behave and make decisions is known as microeconomics.
It investigates how these agents behave in markets and divide scarce resources between competing uses.
Microeconomic issues include things like "reasons a consumer purchases more cheese," "the effect of changes in a good's price on the quantity purchased," and "the determination of market price through supply and demand."
In contrast, macroeconomic topics like "What the government will do to address unemployment" and "The effect of the budget deficit on the rate of interest" look at the operation and composition of the entire economy.
To learn more about Microeconomy,
https://brainly.com/question/28183019
#SPJ4
in mediation, even if the mediator proposes a solution, it will likely be in the nature of a compromise, not a determination of right and wrong. true or false
The statement is true. mediator propably poses a compramise.
What is mediation?The goal of mediation is to help disputing parties reach their own mutually acceptable resolution of the issues at stake by the voluntary participation of a suitable, impartial, and neutral third party (without decision-making authority). With the aid of an impartial third party, disagreeing parties negotiate during mediation.
scenarios where disputing parties have reached a standstill in their negotiations but are still in communication and willing to use a neutral third party to help them negotiate is where mediators come in.
In various provincial legal systems, mediation is a necessary step in the litigation process before going to trial. Authorized court employees decide when to use mediation.
To learn more about mediation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29318361
#SPJ4
an effective query process supports the hospital’s compliance with
An efficient inquiry procedure helps the hospital adhere to billing/coding regulations and acts as a teaching tool for providers, CDI experts, and coding experts on the physician side.
What kind of instructional technology tool would that be?Examples include interactive whiteboards, virtual bulletin boards, content management systems, and virtual classrooms for online education. According to a Gallup poll from 2019, 65% of instructors utilize digital teaching aids on a daily basis.
What makes educational tools crucial?Because it enables modern instructors to incorporate new technologies and tools into their classrooms, educational technology in education is crucial. The learner-centeredness of the classroom may be enhanced by the teachers. It enables educators to interact with pupils in distinctive, original, and fair ways.
To know more about educational tool visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8325496
#SPJ4
why it is important to provide credible references on your Law Enforcement Application:
Answer:
A poorly written report will cause a detective or an investigator to expend more time and effort to solve or clear a case and thus cost taxpayers more money.
Explanation:
have great day!
the principle failing of the ucr is that only a minority of law enforcement agencies across the country take part in it annually. t/f
The statement '' A fundamental flaw of the UCR is that only a small number of law enforcement agencies nationwide participate each year '' is False .
The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program produces reliable statistics for law enforcement. It also provides information for criminal justice students, researchers, the media, and the public. This program has provided crime statistics since 1930. UCR records crimes reported to law enforcement, but only collects arrest data for simple assaults and sex crimes, with the exception of violent rapes. Third, the NCVS and UCR definitions of some crimes differ due to methodology.
The FBI's annual Uniform Crime Reports are based on data generated at the local level. Statistical reports on the number of different types of crimes, number of arrests, and types of unsolved crimes in the community serve many purposes, including possible budgetary justification.
To know more about UCR visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30273202
#SPJ4
in the kelo case, the u.s. supreme court majority that decided that case applied this type of constitutional interpretation: _________
The U.S. Supreme Court majority in the Kelo v. the City of New London case applied the doctrine of "public use" under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which allows for the use of the eminent domain for public purposes.
In the Kelo v. City of New London case, the U.S. Supreme Court majority upheld the use of eminent domain by the City of New London, Connecticut, to take private property for the purpose of economic development. The Court applied the "public use" doctrine under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which provides that private property shall not be taken for public use without compensation.
The Court held that the City's plan to transfer the taken property to private developers for the purpose of economic development constituted a valid public use, as it would benefit the community as a whole by creating jobs, increasing tax revenue, and revitalizing the local economy.
To learn more about economic development, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/19632298
#SPJ4
strict scrutiny tests are applied to cases involving classifications based on . question 11 options: legitimacy marriage height gender age
In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used.
The greatest level of judicial review used by courts to determine whether laws, rules, or even other governmental policies are constitutional is known as strict scrutiny. When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. In situations involving have such on legitimacy, strict scrutiny standards are used. The phrase "strict scrutiny" therefore refers to a standard that declares laws invalid unless they are "necessary," "narrowly drawn," or "closely tailored" to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest." Race, race, national origin, and (in some situations) alienage-based laws are all forms of discrimination.
(Strict scrutiny tests are applied to cases involving classifications based on __.
A. height
B. legitimacy
C. marriage
D. age
E. gender)
Learn more about scrutiny
https://brainly.com/question/29749587
#SPJ4
The US Constitution establishes a system of government based on the principle of federalism. True or False ?
The U.S. Constitution establishes a system of government based on the principle of federalism, and the authority to govern is divided between federal and state governments; the statement is true.
What is federalism?Federalism is a combination and compound form of government that divides the authorities between a general government (the central or "federal") and regional administrations in one political system.The first instances of federalism as we know it today were in the state unions that made up the Old Swiss Confederacy.
Confederalism, in which the general level of administration is subordinate to the regional level, and devolution within a unitary state, in which the regional level of government is subservient to the general level, are not the same as federalism.. It is the core form in the process of regional integration or disintegration, bordered by unitary state devolution on its more integrated side and confederalism on its less integrated side.
To learn more about federalism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements best indicates how chancery courts were different from law courts?
a. Chancery courts emphasized developing merchant laws rather than laws for the common citizen.
b. Chancery courts inquired into the merits of a case rather than emphasize legal procedures.
c. Chancery courts emphasized a standard set of remedies across different cases rather than provide equitable remedies.
d. Chancery courts had lower precedence level over legal decisions than the law courts.
The statement that best indicates how chancery courts were different from law courts is Chancery courts inquired into the merits of a case rather than emphasize legal procedures.
What are Chancery courts?
Chancery courts received their name from the fact that, prior to the enactment of the judicature statutes in the 1870s in England, they had the authority of a chancellor who served as the "King's conscience." As a "court of chancery," which effectively evolved into a court with wide equity jurisdiction, this appellation made its way to the United States. Equity is a centuries-old English legislature idea, just like the chancery court itself.
Learn more on legislature here:
brainly.com/question/30413708
#SPJ4
the law that states that as the price of a good, service, or resource rises, the quantity supplied will increase, all else held constant, is the law of
Answer:
The law of supply ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Based on your understanding of Affirmative Action Supreme Court cases, what should be the impact of the Strict Scrutiny test on the future of Affirmative Action Programs?
Answer:
How does strict scrutiny relate to affirmative action?
For the unfamiliar: A race-conscious policy satisfies strict scrutiny if it 1) furthers a compelling (i.e. necessary) state interest, and 2) is “narrowly tailored” such that the policy minimizes, to the extent possible, differential treatment on the basis of race.
Explanation:
T/F the u.s. constitution specifies how powers are allocated within state-level institutions.
The assertion made is untrue. The distribution of authority among state-level institutions is not spelled out in the U.S. Constitution.
What, in plain terms, does the US Constitution entail?The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches and their respective responsibilities. It also defines the basic law of the United States federal government. It is the earliest continuous governmental constitution still in use and has come to represent Western legal precedent.
What makes the US Constitution significant?One of the main goals of the Charter of rights and freedoms as it was drafted by the General assembly was to establish a government with sufficient authority to act on a government level without compromising fundamental rights.
To know more about US Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28824274
#SPJ4
One main difference between the United States Constitution and state constitutions is that state constitutions A. cant be amended B. provide supremecy over federal government C. dont include how to set up local goevenrments D. states specific services to provide
Answer:
D. States specific services to provide.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
what are the pros and cons of plea bargaining
Pros: Lighter Penalty, Lower Charge
Cons: Keeping the prosecution's case from being problematic,
No "Not Guilty" verdict
What is plea bargainingIn criminal court proceedings, a plea bargain is an arrangement in which the prosecutor makes a concession to the defendant in exchange for the defendant entering a guilty or no contest plea.
Normally, the prosecution and the defendant negotiate a plea agreement. When a person pleads guilty to a lower charge, the prosecution frequently eliminates some of the other accusations against them. Despite being aware of the negotiation process, the court typically stays out of it.
Learn more about plea bargaining here:
https://brainly.com/question/4345768#:~:text=Expert%2DVerified%20Answer&text=In%20a%20plea%20bargain%2C%20a,of%20a%20full%20jury%20trial.
#SPJ1