One poor thing about Pakistani regulation or any component of the legal system that you disagree with: Many people within the united states of America are unhappy with the Judicial gadget u. s .. they have got misplaced religion within the judicial machine of Pakistan.
A legal system is a procedure or process for deciphering and enforcing the regulation. The 3 foremost legal structures of the world consist of civil law, common law, and spiritual law. other legal structures are: Jury device is a felony device for determining the information at the difficulty in a lawsuit.
A quick Primer on the world's legal system
There are normally considered to be five criminal systems in the international these days: civil regulation, commonplace law, normal law, spiritual law, and blended felony systems. Civil regulation systems have their starting place inside the Roman prison way of life.
As attorneys recognize, the legal systems in international locations around the arena generally fall into certainly one of the fundamental classes: not unusual regulation systems and civil law systems.
Learn more about the legal system here: https://brainly.com/question/7694457
#SPJ9
The u. S. Supreme court has ____________ jurisdiction involving disputes between states.
Answer:The U. S. Supreme court has Original Jurisdiction involving disputes between states.
Explanation:
This week we learned that most sheriffs are elected and most police chiefs are appointed. Do you believe chiefs should be elected as well? Or both sheriffs and chiefs appointed? Should law enforcement be tied to politics through an election at all? Explain your answer.
1. The election of police chiefs is good for democracy as it allows the people to participate in selecting the head of this important government agency or department.
2. It is also necessary to elect sheriffs, who are county heads of law enforcement. Sheriffs' elections will guarantee better performance.
3. Law enforcement is not tied to politics through the election of the police chief and the sheriff. Instead, their election removes them from politics, especially when they are not contesting under any political party.
Why it is necessary to elect police chiefs?The election of police chiefs by the electorate involves the general voting public to determine the level and use of force to keep the community safe.
This system is a democratic process for the people in the community are involved in choosing who gets elected for law enforcement.
Election removes the position of the chief of police from the political manipulations of the politicians.
Thus, the election of the chief of police ensures that the best resident is chosen for the job, irrespective of their academic qualifications and political affiliations.
Learn more about elections for police chiefs at https://brainly.com/question/13868604
#SPJ1
Court reporters must produce an accurate, word-for-word transcript of a trial. What is the modern way to do
that?
O Writing notes by hand.
O Using shorthand
O Using a stenotype machine.
O With audio recordings.
Using a stenotype machine is the modern method for court reporters to obtain an exact, word-for-word transcript of a trial.
The majority of court reporters, including myself, have encountered that query dozens, if not hundreds of times throughout the course of our careers. The people who typically ask this at depositions from our steno machines are witnesses, along with variations like "Is that shorthand?" "I don't know how you type on that little thing," I said. And the classic question of every court reporter, "Now, did you go to school for that?"
Of course, I also explain as succinctly as I can how I manage to work my steno machine, as do probably most of us. However, these are actually excellent questions given that nobody else in the world, court reporters outside us court reporters, has any notion whatsoever of how we go about doing what we do.
Learn more about court reporters here
https://brainly.com/question/15053645
#SPJ9
The first law requiring food labels to contain nutrition information was passed in 2000. True or false?.
Answer:
the answer is false because
Explanation:
it was passed in 1973
Medicare Parts C and D sponsors are not required to have a compliance
program.
a. True
b. False
Medicare Parts C and D sponsors are not required to have a compliance program. This statement is false.
As a condition of their ongoing participation, providers and suppliers engaged in federal healthcare programs are required by Section 6401(a)(7) of the Act to establish and maintain compliance systems.
Everyone is responsible for compliance! Every decision you make might have an impact on Medicare beneficiaries, the Medicare Program, or the Medicare Trust Fund if you are a person who offers medical or administrative services to Medicare enrollees.
For those utilizing Medicare Parts C and D, there are certain training requirements. All workers at Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) and Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs), together referred to as "Sponsors" in this course, are required to complete training on CMS program compliance.
Learn more about Medicare training here:
https://brainly.com/question/28069617
#SPJ4
Does the constitution require that members of the u. S. House of representatives live in the congressional districts that they represent?.
No, the constitution didn't require that members of U. S. House of representatives live in the congressional districts that they represent.
What is the power of the House of Representatives?The House has a number of exclusive rights, including the ability to introduce revenue legislation, remove federal officials from office, and choose the President in the event of a deadlock in the Electoral College.
A member of the House must be at least 25 years old, a citizen of the United States for at least seven years, and a resident of the state they are elected to represent, according to the Constitution (though not necessarily the same district).
No one may serve as a representative if they have not attained the age of twenty-five, have not been citizens of the United States for seven years, and are not residents of the state in which they are chosen at the time of their election.
Learn more about the House of Representative's power here:
https://brainly.com/question/28257817
#SPJ4
Some of the ambulance personnel who died on September 11th were working for
private ambulance companies; what does this BEST illustrates?
(1 point)
о
Important public services may be performed by private companies paid from public
funds.
Training in private companies is often inadequate and inferior to training for public
services.
Both private and public service workers need to be recognized for their heroic
efforts.
O There was a widespread shortage of ambulance drivers before September 11th.
1 of 15
The best solution that shows what is illustrated would be that There was a widespread shortage of ambulance drivers before September 11th.
What is the the meaning of shortage?This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that the number of people that are available to provide a given service are few in number or it tells us that the people that would be able to take care of the production of a particular good are not available.
The event of September 11th was one that involved a lot of pain to Americans because they were attacked by terrorists on their own soil. They were killed and injured in a large number hence the need for the ambulances.
Because of the shortage of the drivers in the public sector, the private sector had to take over the delivery of the services.
Read more on September 11th here:
https://brainly.com/question/27171422
#SPJ1
Discuss the difference between respondent and operant conditioning, using examples for each.
Answer: Classical conditioning involves associating an involuntary response and a stimulus, while operant conditioning is about associating a voluntary behavior and a consequence. In respondent conditioning, the US could be an appetitive or aversive stimulus. For instance, in appetitive conditioning, the US would be something desirable such as candy which makes us happy. Other examples could include water, food, sex, or drugs. For example, when lab rats press a lever when a green light is on, they receive a food pellet as a reward. When they press the lever when a red light is on, they receive a mild electric shock. As a result, they learn to press the lever when the green light is on and avoid the red light.
Explanation:
A researcher wants to study the effects of a new drug on fetal development. Before testing the drug on pregnant women, the researcher first wants to ensure that it is indeed safe on humans. To do this, the research team recruits inmates at a local prison and offers to compensate each participant with $30.
From the situation that we have here, this cannot be said to be ethical. The justification here is that the people in these areas are humans.
What is the justification to why this is unethical?This is because the use of inmates as the test or the lab rats is unfair. Because they are inmates in the prison does not make them to be more or less human beings. They should still be treated in the right way. The use of human subjects on new drugs is an unethical practice.
The way that the drug should be testedThe first way would have to be through the laboratories. When it is able to pass the tests in the laboratories and considered safe, then it can be tested on animals in order to see if it would have any side effects before it would be tested on humans.
Read more on research here: https://brainly.com/question/25257437
#SPJ1
complete question
You are on the IRB committee and need to determine if the project is ethical or not. Justify your answers below. Then, if you stated the project had an ethical violation, provide a way in which the researcher could modify the study to make it more ethical. Note: do not assume the researcher will complete steps not otherwise indicated.
How much is the fine for violating any of the restrictions of the gdl permit or probationary license?.
An examination of fear of crime studies shows that fear of being a victim of a terrorist attack is much higher than that of more common crimes and homicide. Given the limited number of terrorist attacks on American soil and the limited number of deaths and injuries, why does fear of a terrorist attack rank so high?
The fear of a terrorist attack is one that has been rank so high because Americans has made a lot of enemies in this past years such as Russian, North Korea, China and others.
What is meant by the word terrorist attack?A terrorist attack is known to be a kind of violent form of an incident, that is known to be made up of murder and bombing, genocide, etc.
This is known to be an action that is said to be carried out by people who are said to be acting on behalf of their goal or country to attain political aims.
Terrorism is said to be a kind of an unlawful duty that entails the use of force or violence against persons or property .
Therefore, The fear of a terrorist attack is one that has been rank so high because Americans has made a lot of enemies in this past years such as Russian, North Korea, China and others.
Learn more about terrorist attack from
https://brainly.com/question/27720927
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements about the functions of Congress is true, based on the infographic?
A. Writing and approving legislation is a rapid and efficient process.
B. A bill that is approved by a committee is guaranteed to become a law.
C. A bill may be killed at many points throughout the lawmaking process.
D. A bill is considered to be a law when the Senate and the House agree on its wording.
Answer: C.) A bill may be killed at many points throughout the lawmaking process.
Explanation: just took test
In Florida, how many kinds of field sobriety tests are
there?
In the context of a court case process, what is the definition of affirmation?
Answer:
An affirmation is a declaration that something is true. In a legal context, it is a formal statement made under oath.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!