The National Institute of Standards and Technology was given the task of developing information security standards and recommendations by the Department of Commerce in accordance with the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA).
What is FISMA?Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is a federal law in the United States that was passed in 2002 and creates a thorough framework to safeguard the information systems of the federal government. All federal agencies are required by FISMA to create, maintain, and execute information security plans that incorporate risk management, security planning, and security control evaluations. In accordance with FISMA, organizations must also submit yearly reports to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) detailing the security of their information systems and the efficacy of their security procedures. The purpose of FISMA is to guarantee that the federal government's information technology systems are safe and that sensitive data is shielded from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, interruption, alteration, or destruction.
To learn more about FISMA visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/30429375
#SPJ4
how could congress raise money under the articles of confederation?
The only ways that Congress could raise money were by asking the states for assistance, borrowing money from foreign nations, and selling western territory.
Who is recognized as an official from a foreign government?(1) (A) The term "foreign official" refers to any officer or employee of a foreign government, or of any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, or of a public international organization, as well as to any person acting in an official capacity on behalf of any such government or department, agency, or instrumentality.
What kind of official would that be?The police and other security services, such as immigration and border control, are examples of foreign public authorities. They also include local government members and officials.
To know more about foreign government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28083530
#SPJ4
A hotel with a revolving door will be liable for all injuries that result from its use unless an attendant is on duty to oversee its use.True or False
False. A hotel with a revolving door will be liable for the all injuries that result from its use unless an attendant is on the duty to oversee its use.
When A Hotel Is Liable for Injuries?According to the legal definition of duty of care, each individual or organization is required to act responsibly in order to prevent harm to others. A driver owes it to others to drive safely, which includes abiding by the law and not texting and driving.
A pedestrian on a sidewalk has a responsibility to act in a way that keeps them safe from danger from passing automobiles. A hotel owes a duty of care to its visitors, staff, and customers. It must take action to prevent harm or mishaps that can be foreseen with reasonable certainty.
To know more about hotel visit
brainly.com/question/30413709
#SPJ4
late-nineteenth-century transoceanic labor migrations, like the one experienced by li zhou, were most directly facilitated by which of the following developments?
The creation of new, more inexpensive transportation options were most directly facilitated late-nineteenth-century transoceanic labor migrations.
The decline of the native American population contributed to the increase in transatlantic migration. Transatlantic migration was influenced by three major events. Migration was prompted by the European Reformation, the annihilation of the Native American people, and the establishment of the sugar plantation system. The Columbian Trade, which came from the increased connections between the Eastern and Western Hemispheres, saw the exchange of novel plants, animals, and illnesses. One of the biggest migrations of individuals in American history was known as the Great Migration. Between the 1910s and the 1970s, around six million Black Americans relocated from the American South to northern, midwestern, and western states.
Li Zhou, laborer from Guangzhou province in southern China, interview given to a reporter in the United States describing his journey to the United States in the 1860s Late-nineteenth-century transoceanic labor migrations were most directly facilitated by which of the following developements?
Learn more about migration here:
https://brainly.com/question/1831454
#SPJ4
a three-car accident occurred in which the drivers were a citizen of state a, a citizen of state b, and a citizen of state c. the state a citizen filed a negligence action against the other two in federal district court and lost his case. after judgment, may the state c citizen assert and maintain a negligence action against the state b citizen seeking damages for the injuries the state c citizen sustained in the same accident?
The court should rule on the State C defendant's motion to dismiss for improper venue Grant the motion, because the motion is timely and venue is improper.
A motion is a legal procedure used in American law to ask a court to rule on a specific, contentious issue. It is a request for a ruling on the case from the judge (or judges). Motions may be filed at any stage in administrative, criminal, or civil proceedings, albeit this right is subject to local court regulations. The party requesting the motion is sometimes referred to as the moving party or just the movant. The nonmoving party or nonmovant is the party that is opposed to the motion. In the United States, courts typically lack the ability to execute themselves.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28375470
#SPJ4
a restaurant was located on the sixth floor of a building. kim took the elevator, the type that was operated by an elevator attendant, and rode to the sixth floor intending to have lunch at the restaurant. when the elevator operator opened the door, the elevator was five inches below the floor, creating a step between the elevator and the restaurant floor. while exiting the elevator, kim struck her foot against the elevator shaft, fell, and was injured. true or false: kim should have observed the positioning of the elevator when the doors opened and before she exited; if she sues the hotel for her injuries, her own negligence will negatively impact her recovery. TRUE/FALSE
True. Kim should have observed the positioning of the elevator when the doors opened and before she exited. If she sues the hotel for her injuries, her own negligence may negatively impact her recovery.
A plaintiff must show three things in order to establish negligence as a cause of action under tort law, the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty,the defendant violated that duty by acting negligently, and the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the defendant's negligence. Under English Law, the idea of negligence came into existence. Even though English Common Law had long mandated culpability for the wrongdoings of others, it wasn't until the eighteenth century that negligence became a stand-alone cause of action. At that time, another crucial idea legal culpability for inaction emerged.
To know more about defendant's refer :
brainly.com/question/29646460
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. according to the___, the u.s. has the right to act preemptively against another country or entity if it perceives the country is in danger of being attacked.
According to the Patriot Act law the U.S. has the right to act preemptively against another country or entity if it perceives the country is in danger of being attacked.
Enforcement with new tools to detect and prevent terrorism, The Patriot Act passed almost unanimously in the Senate by her 98-1 votes and in the House by her 357-66 votes, with the support of members of various political circles. Enable law enforcement to monitor more terrorist crimes.
With computerization increasingly facilitating the creation of such records, Section 215 of the Patriot Act allows the FBI to make records available to clients for everyone, including doctors, libraries, bookstores, universities, and Internet service providers. can be forced to do so. or customer.
To know more about Patriot law visit :
https://brainly.com/question/13991438
#SPJ4
true or false administrative civil or criminal sanctions may be imposed
True . administrative civil or criminal sanctions may be imposed
Sanctions are penalties or other means of enforcement used to provide incentives for compliance with the law, or with rules and regulations, according to law and legal definition.
Criminal sanctions may include severe punishment, such as corporal or capital punishment, incarceration, or heavy fines. In civil law, sanctions are typically monetary fines levied against a party to a lawsuit or their attorney for violating procedural rules or abusing the judicial process.
In a civil lawsuit, the most severe sanction is the involuntary dismissal, with prejudice, of a complaining party's cause of action or the responding party's answer.
learn more about criminal sanctions
https://brainly.com/question/30037419
#SPJ4
A state that imposes a higher rate of tax on out-of-state companies than it does for in-state companies simply to protect the local companies from out-of-state competition is probably violating the _____________ clause of the Constitution.Full Faith and CreditSeparation of PowersEqual ProtectionSupremacy
A state that imposes a higher rate of tax on out-of-state companies than it does for in-state companies simply to protect the local companies from out-of-state competition is probably violating the supremacy clause of the Constitution
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) states that the Constitution, federal laws enacted under it, and treaties concluded under its authority constitute the "supreme Law of the Land," and thus take precedence over any conflicting state laws.
It states that state courts are bound by the supreme law, and state constitutions are subordinate to it. Federal statutes and treaties, on the other hand, must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be in accordance with the enumerated powers of the federal government and not violate other constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights—of particular interest is the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it.
Learn more about supremacy clause
https://brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
suppose that capital goods are on the vertical axis while consumption goods are on the horizontal axis of china's ppf. as a result of enacting the policies, we would expect
China's PPF to shift outwards, indicating an increase in the production of both capital and consumption goods.
This shift outwards could be caused by increased production efficiency, a greater availability of resources, or both.PPF moving outside. We can infer that an economy has expanded when the PPF moves outward. In contrast, when the PPF turns inward, it means that the economy is contracting as a result of insufficient resource allocation and output capacity. playing while it loads. The production potential frontier (PPF) is a curve that, given a set of inputs made up of resources and other factors, shows all possible maximum output scenarios for two items. The PPF takes the stance that all inputs are effectively speed used.
To know more about speed refer :
brainly.com/question/30286203
#SPJ4
all conditioned motivating operations are motivationally neutral prior to their relation with another mo or to a form of reinforcement or punishment. true or false
The statement is true, conditioned motivating operations (CMO) is neutral before coming across MO to form a reinforcement or punishment.
What is conditioned motivating operations?An object or an event that has been educated to have a reinforcing value as a result of previously learning the relationship is known as a conditioned motivating operation. A CMO can include requiring a car key to start a vehicle. A car key's connection to a vehicle is a result of prior knowledge. its opposite, Unconditioned motivational operations occur when a circumstance or object has a reinforcing value independent of prior knowledge. A good illustration is the necessity to sate your hunger if you are marooned on an island without food. It would not be necessary for this association to have been previously learned.
to learn more about motivational operations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28234375
#SPJ4
some canadian troops are sent (as part of a u.n. peacekeeping force) to a country located on the earth's equator. at night, when homesickness makes them gaze sleeplessly at the stars, which of the following will be familiar to them (the same at the equator as in canada):
The rotation of the earth is not as simple as a spherical just revolving. The earth's rotation is tilted at an angle of 23.5° relative to our orbital plane, the plane of the earth's orbit around the sun, due to the shape of the earth,
Which is best described as gelid; spherical but slightly flattened at the poles, some gravitational forces acting on the earth, and the presence of seasons.
The celestial north and south poles are the north and south poles on the tilted earth's rotating axis when it is taken into account.
The equator on the tilted earth that is projected into space to be equally far from the celestial north and south poles is known as the celestial equator. The heavenly equator crosses a section of the actual equator.
For such more question on rotation.
https://brainly.com/question/1808956
#SPJ4
stands for the idea that courts should interpret the constitution only according to the intentions of those who wrote it. question 17 options: constitutional holding dicta legal realism constitutional relativity originalis
The term that stands for the idea that courts should interpret the Constitution only according to the intentions of those who wrote it is "originalism."
Originalism is a conservative interpretive philosophy that holds that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the original intent of its framers. According to this view, the words and phrases of the Constitution have a fixed and unchanging meaning, and courts should not interpret the Constitution in a way that would alter or expand its original meaning. In contrast, other interpretive philosophies, such as legal realism or constitutional relativity, argue that the Constitution should be interpreted in light of contemporary circumstances and changing social, economic, and political conditions. These philosophies emphasize the dynamic nature of the Constitution and the need for courts to adapt its interpretation to reflect evolving societal norms and values.
To learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
which of the following scenarios illustrates an action that would be protected by the free exercise clause in the first amendment?
Wearing a necklace bearing a Christian cross to work would be considered an action protected by the free exercise clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
This clause protects the right of individuals to freely exercise their religion and prohibits the government from interfering with religious practices, as long as they do not cause harm to others.
In this scenario, wearing a Christian cross as a form of religious expression would be considered a protected religious practice, and an employer would not be able to prohibit an employee from doing so, unless there is a compelling reason to do so, such as a legitimate health and safety concern.
To know more about first amendment
brainly.com/question/341077
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. udges who identify with___give great deference to the political process. question 7 options: judicial conservatives judicial restraint strict activists judicial activists judicial realists
Judges who identify with "judicial restraint" give great deference to the political process.
Judicial restraint is a philosophy of judicial interpretation that emphasizes the limited role of the courts in resolving disputes. Judges who adopt this philosophy believe that the judiciary should only intervene in cases where there is a clear violation of the law and should otherwise defer to the political branches of government to make policy decisions. Judges who adhere to this philosophy believe that the political process, including the actions of the legislative and executive branches, should be given great weight and should be respected. They view the role of the judiciary as being limited to interpreting the law and applying it to the facts of a case, rather than actively shaping policy or making decisions based on their own policy preferences. In this way, judges who embrace judicial restraint give great deference to the political process, recognizing the democratic principles that underlie the separation of powers and the idea that the judiciary should not be a super-legislature or executive. It's important to note that the concept of judicial restraint can be contrasted with other philosophies of judicial interpretation, such as judicial activism, which emphasize a more active role for the judiciary in shaping policy and making decisions based on the judge's own policy preferences.
to learn more about Judicial restraint here:
https://brainly.com/question/19753459
#SPJ4
which of the following statements is not true? group of answer choices a court can hear a case if it has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiciton a court can hear a case if it has in rem jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction a court generally does not exercise both personal jurisdiction and in rem in the same case a court needs either personal jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction to hear a case but not both
A court must have both personal and subject matter jurisdiction before hearing a case. In this case Option C is correct.
Subject-matter jurisdiction, also known as jurisdiction ratione material, refers to a court's ability to hear cases of a particular nature or cases pertaining to a particular subject matter.
For instance, the bankruptcy court can only hear bankruptcy cases.
The ability of a court to impose judgment against a specific defendant is known as personal jurisdiction. Territorial jurisdiction is the ability of a court to impose judgment on events that took place within a specific geographic area. Lack of subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, in contrast to personal or territorial jurisdiction.
A decision rendered by a court that lacked subject-matter jurisdiction is forever void.
To know more about Subject-matter jurisdiction here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true?
A court must have both personal and subject matter jurisdiction before hearing a case
A court only needs subject matter jurisdiction to hear a case
A court only needs personal jurisdiction to hear a case
A court could never exercise in rem jurisdiction
a court, following stare decisis, may decide not to use a common law rule from an earlier case in which of these situations?
A court, following stare decisis, may decide not to use a common law rule only when it involves a government body.
What is common law rule?
Common law, often known as Anglo-American law, is the body of customary law that has been governed by the common-law courts of England since the Middle Ages. It is based on judicial decisions and is reflected in reports of decided cases.
The common law is the body of legislation that has been developed by judges and other quasi-judicial bodies and is distinguished by being expressed in written opinions.
Learn more about common law rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ1
The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, "the power to tax involves the power to destroy."
The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. This is the case of McCulloch v. Maryland.
The Act of April 10th, 1816, ch. 44, to "incorporate the subscribers to the Bank of the United States," is a constitutional statute.
The Union Government, despite its limited powers, is paramount within its field of action, and its laws, when issued in accordance with the Constitution, become the supreme law of the land.
There is nothing in the United States Constitution that is equivalent to the Articles of Confederation in terms of excluding incidental or implicit powers.
If the aim is legal and within the scope of the Constitution, all appropriate, clearly fitted to that end, and not forbidden means may be constitutionally employed to carry it out.
To know more about McCulloch v. Maryland:
https://brainly.com/question/546157
#SPJ4
Correct question:
The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, "the power to tax involves the power to destroy." Which case is this?
Which of the following requires state governments to spend their own money to meet standards imposed on them by the federal government?
a. categorical grants
b. block grants
c. program grants
d. formula grants
e. unfunded mandates
A correct answer is an option (e), i.e., unfunded mandates. Unfunded mandates are federal requirements imposed on state and local governments without providing funding to cover the cost of complying with these requirements.
This means that state governments must spend their own resources to meet the standards imposed by the federal government without receiving financial assistance to do so. On the other hand, categorical, block, program, and formula grants are forms of federal financial assistance provided to state and local governments to help them carry out specific programs and activities.
These grants come with specific conditions and requirements, but they also provide funding to help states meet them. Unfunded mandates burden state and local budgets, while grants provide funding to support specific programs and activities.
To learn more about unfunded mandates, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13038480
#SPJ4
mr. simpson has blood type abrh and his wife type orh . mr. doodle has type arh- and his wife type orh . the simpsons and doodles each had a baby girl on the same day. when they took their children home, their doctors found that the doodle girl had blood type arh- and the simpson girl had type orh . the simpsons sued the hospital for giving them the wrong baby. could they win the case?
Both Mr. Simpson and his wife have the blood type ABRh+. While his wife is type ORh+, Mr. Doodle is type ARh-. On the same day, a baby girl was born to The Simpsons and Doodles.
Their doctors discovered that the Doodle daughter had blood type ARh- and the Simpson girl had type ORh+ when they brought their kids home. Because the hospital gave the Simpsons the wrong child, they filed a lawsuit. Could they prevail in court? List the two daughters' and their parents' most likely genotypes. Mr. Doodle: Mr. Simpson; Mrs. Doodle: Mrs. Simpson Infant: Doodle Can they triumph Homer is a blood type B, while Marge is an A. Maggie is a blood type O, Bart is blood type B, and Lisa is blood type A. What is the genotype of Homer's blood, assuming he is the father of all three children a, B, O, C, and D. It is impossible to be certain. I have a query for you. One homeless and one A blood type each exist in March. That's accurate, of course. That was also provided to us. Bart's blood type is known. Blood type A is what Lisa is. Her blood type is O. The three children's father is Homer. What kind of homework is due tonight.
Learn more about simpson here :
https://brainly.com/question/11774196
#SPJ4
judicial activism is the idea that the constitution is a living document whose strength lies in its flexibility and that
Judicial activism refers to a philosophy of interpretation that emphasizes the judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution as a flexible and evolving document rather than as a fixed and rigid set of principles.
This approach allows the courts to adapt to changing social, political, and economic conditions and respond to new challenges and issues. It is often contrasted with judicial restraint, which holds that the courts should interpret the Constitution strictly and limit their role too narrowly to interpreting the law and not making policy decisions.
Judicial activism and judicial restraint are often seen as competing approaches to the judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution and shaping public policy. The debate between these two perspectives often centers on the balance between the role of the judiciary in protecting individual rights and the role of the legislative and executive branches in making policy decisions.
To learn more about judicial activism, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/509532
#SPJ4
under which category of law would marleana harrison bring a cause of action against dr. billy ray for disclosing information regarding her previous physical examination to his wife, jana ray, who is ms. harrison's hairstylist?
Answer:
2nd catagory
Explanation:
After real estate taxes have been sold by the state or county to satisfy a delinquent tax lien, the defaulted owner usually has a right to:
A. Have the sale canceled by paying the back taxes and penalties
B. Pay his or her creditors directly and have their liens removed
C. Redeem the property within the time specified by law
D. Record a notice of non-responsibility for the unpaid taxes
Hence option C is correct.
After the property is sold by the state or county to satisfy a past-due tax debt, the defaulting owners often have the right to redeem the property within a certain time frame.
This implies that they have the choice to pay the full amount of the tax lien as well as any extra fees and interest in order to regain possession of the property.
The delinquent owners will have a specified period of time to redeem the property, depending on the regulations of the state where the property is located.
In certain states, delinquent owners may be allowed a few months to redeem the property, but in others, they may be granted a year or more. In order to redeem the property and avoid losing their ownership rights, defaulted owners must be informed of the redemption term and any deadlines.
Therefore, the defaulting owners often have the right to redeem the property within a set time period following the sale of the property by the state or county to pay a past-due tax obligation.
For such more question on property.
https://brainly.com/question/28689752
#SPJ4
the articles of confederation did not give the people direct control over congress. who appointed members of congress?
The Articles of Confederation did not give the people any direct power over Congress. Members of the Constituent Assembly, the country that preceded the United States today
What is the Articles of Confederation's primary goal?The Articles of Confederation, which came into effect after the United States' pronouncement of independence from Britain, set forth the duties of the federal government.
Why did the Confederation Articles fail? What were they?The failure of the Constitutional Convention was ultimately caused by the fact that they were designed to keep the federal government as ineffective as plausible: there was no ability to enforce laws. no national courts or judicial branch. Amendments could only be approved by a unanimous vote.
To know more about Articles of Confederation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14516569
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. although james madison personally did not believe that the tenth amendment was necessary, he urged that it be adopted.
The statement is False. James Madison believed that the Tenth Amendment was necessary and advocated for its adoption.
Madison was one of the main authors of the United States Constitution and is widely considered the "Father of the Constitution." He was a strong supporter of federalism and believed that the Tenth Amendment, which defines the federal government's powers and states, was crucial for preserving the balance of power between the two levels of government.
Madison argued that the amendment was necessary to protect the states from federal overreach and to ensure that the federal government was limited in its powers to those specifically delegated to it by the Constitution.
To learn more about Madison, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/9594653
#SPJ4
while walking down a city street, the plaintiff was seriously injured when a rotten limb fell off of a tree and hit him on the head. the tree was located on a vacant lot next to the defendant's house. the lot appeared to be a part of the defendant's property. the plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages for his injuries, alleging that the defendant was negligent with respect to the care of the tree. the defendant's defense was that he did not own the lot or the tree, and that both the lot and the tree were the property of the city. at trial, the plaintiff calls a witness to testify that shortly after the plaintiff was taken to the hospital, he observed the defendant cutting down the rotten limbs on a number of trees on the vacant lot. should the witness's testimony be admitted?
The witness's testimony is most likely to be Admissible, to help prove that the defendant owned the lot.
Any tangible objects or statements of fact that can be presented to a court as a way to verify the veracity of a particular claim under inquiry are considered evidence. A primary responsibility of courts is to conduct proper proceedings in order to hear and examine evidence in order for court rulings to be founded on truth supported by evidence. The so-called law of evidence is mostly composed of procedural rules governing how facts are proved and presented, whether by witness testimony, the presentation of papers or tangible objects, or the invocation of a foreign law.
Learn more about evidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/21428682
#SPJ4
TRUE OR FALSE even though he did not compose chant, this individual is directly responsible for ensuring that the chants would be documented.
FALSE even though he did not compose chant, this individual is directly responsible for ensuring that the chants would be documented.
Gregorian chant isn't as dominant in parish life as it once was, but according to McDonnell, if history repeats itself, it is in the recovery stage and may once again become a mainstay of church music. The Latin chant's rendition aims to capture the life and vitality of the original manuscript recordings. Fr. Columba's English chant is based on the word emphasis and organic word rhythm of the English language. The end result is an oddly modern form of music with a loose acting rhythm. With later additions and redactions, Gregorian chant evolved mostly in western and central Europe during the ninth and tenth centuries. Gregorian chant was supposedly created by Pope Gregory I, according to popular tradition.
To know more about acting refer :
brainly.com/question/29646460
#SPJ4
true or false,It is legal for a person to have both a Texas Driver's License and a Texas Identification Card.
No. Only a driver licence or identity card, not both, may be held by a person, according to REAL ID and Texas law. Texas Transportation Code Section 521.183 contains the relevant legislation.
What does "transportation" mean to you?
The many methods used to transfer people and/or goods from one place to another are referred to as transportation.
The use of public transportation allows for mobility. Communities must have access to basic services that will ensure the preservation of their members' physical and mental health, employment opportunities, and social and recreational activities in order to maintain a higher level of life.
Roads, railroads, airports, and canals are India's primary means of transportation for transporting goods and people into, around, and across the country.
Know more about legislation Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/782960
#SPJ4
Which U.S. government action provided funding for veterans of the Second WorldWar in order to create a better educated and more productive workforce?answer choicesPassage of the G.I. BillEstablishment of the Peace CorpsPassage of the National Defense Education ActEstablishment of the Department of Veterans Affairs
Passage of the G.I. Bill is the government initiative that provided funds for World War II veterans in order to produce a workforce that is better educated and more productive. The right response is A.
What accomplishes the GI Bill?You can attend college, graduate school, and training programs with the aid of GI Bill funds. Since 1944, the GI Bill has provided eligible Veterans and their families with financial aid to assist pay all or a portion of the costs of attending school or receiving training.
Does the GI Bill provide back pay?No. You won't be required to repay the GI Bill funds you used for that class if you passed it. This is due to the fact that we consider a failing grade (sometimes known as a "punitive grade") as advancement toward graduation criteria.
To know more about G.I. Bill visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12610476
#SPJ4
the ___ are the documents the parties file with the court when they first state their respective claims and defenses.
The documents that parties file with the court when they first state their respective claims and defenses are called pleadings.
Pleadings are the formal written statements submitted by each party in a lawsuit, which outline their claims and defenses. They serve as the foundation of a case and provide the court and opposing parties with a clear understanding of what each side is claiming and why.
There are two types of pleadings in a typical lawsuit: the complaint and the answer. The complaint is the document filed by the plaintiff or the person bringing the lawsuit, which outlines their claims and the relief they seek. The answer is the document filed by the defendant, which responds to the allegations made in the complaint and sets out any defenses they may have.
To learn more about pleadings, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
this sign means be extra careful not to run off of the pavement drive on the shoulders when meeting wide trucks watch for soft spots in the roadway
Keep an eye out for soft patches in the road. Whenever you encounter wide trucks, drive on the shoulder. Pay close attention to avoid running off the pavement.
Do iron-on patches last forever?
An iron-on patch will typically stay in place for about 25 washes, which is plenty for many jackets, trousers, and bags. To apply your patches in a way that is more durable, you must sew them in.
Are patches still purchased today?
They are in right now. The 90s are quite hot right now, and patches are retro and very 90s. People would be fascinated if you post pictures of your patches styled in various ensembles on social media.
know more about attention:
https://brainly.com/question/26181728
#SPJ4