Congress has clarified provisions of the Constitution by passing laws that flesh out some sections.
What is the congress?The United States Congress is the name of the federal government of the United States and the legislative body. It is a bicameral system, with the House of Representatives and the Senate which is its upper body. It convenes in Washington, D.C., at the Capitol building. Direct elections are used to choose senators and representatives, though the governor may suggest a candidate to fill a vacancy in the Senate. 100 senators and 435 congressmen make up the 535-member Congress. Only when there is a tie in the Senate can the vice president of the United States cast a vote. six members of the House of Representatives do not vote.
To learn more about legislation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29804648
#SPJ4
What law set the rules for admitting new states?
The law that sets the rules for admitting new states into the United States is the Admission to the Union clause, which is part of Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution.
According to the clause, for a territory to become a state, it must first draft a constitution and apply for statehood. Then, Congress must pass an act admitting the territory as a state. This act must be approved by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Once the act has been approved and signed into law, the new state is officially admitted to the Union and becomes equal in status to the existing states. This means that the new state has the same powers and rights as the original 13 states, including the right to send representatives to Congress and participate in the Electoral College. In summary, the Admission to the Union clause sets the rules for admitting new states into the United States by providing a clear process for a territory to become a state, which involves drafting a constitution, applying for statehood, and gaining the approval of Congress.
To learn more about law here:
https://brainly.com/question/29734222
#SPJ4
individuals are most likely to obey when demands are made by a
'Individuals are most likely to obey when demands are made by a A close friend physically attractive individual legitimate authority subordinate colleague of similar rank.
Explain Demand Curve?The amount demanded for a commodity is determined by its price as well as many other factors, including the prices of other commodities, consumer income and tastes, and seasonal impacts. All parameters except the commodity price are frequently held constant in basic economic analysis; the analysis then comprises assessing the link between various price levels and the greatest quantity that consumers may theoretically purchase at each of those prices. Price-quantity combinations can be shown on a curve called a demand curve, with price on the vertical axis and quantity on the horizontal axis.
To know more about Demand visit:
brainly.com/question/29892538
#SPJ4
Demands issued by a legitimate authority are those that people will most likely comply with.
Why does someone obey?In real-world circumstances, people follow orders out of a desire to be rewarded, a desire to avoid the bad effects of disobeying, and a conviction that the person in charge is legitimate. In increasingly dire circumstances, people nevertheless comply even when forced to go against their morals or break the law.For instance, if the teacher asks the class to choose between extra recess, no homework, or candy, the majority of the students will follow the majority's lead once a few have voted. If the majority voted differently in a different classroom, the vast majority of students would follow that decision.Demands issued by a legitimate authority are those that people will most likely comply with.To learn more about Demands refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1245771
#SPJ1
What is the idea of a state ignoring or failing to enforce national laws called?
The idea of a state ignoring or failing to enforce national laws is commonly referred to as "lawlessness" or "anarchy".
Anarchy can be some type of rule where people are not given any right to involve in political duties and the king is the supreme power this type of rule is opposite to the monarchy where the king looks after his people's welfare and rules his land without any discrimination.
In political science, lawlessness is sometimes referred to as "state collapse" or "governance failure". When a state is unable or unwilling to enforce its laws, it may result in a lack of security and social order, leading to chaos and insecurity.
To know more about lawlessness
brainly.com/question/231680
#SPJ4
although identifying the legal issue is a four-step process, it is not always necessary to go through all four steps.True or False
The statement '' Identifying legal issues is a four-step process, but you don't necessarily have to go through all four steps '' is True .
Essentially, legal research is the process you use to identify and find the law, including statutes, regulations and court decisions, that apply to the facts of your case. In most cases, the purpose of legal research is to find support for a particular legal issue or decision. The existence of a legal obligation owed by the defendant to the plaintiff. Defendant breach of duty. Plaintiff is injured. Evidence that the defendant's violation caused the injury
A contract consists of four main elements: offer, acceptance, willingness to enter into a legally binding legal relationship, and consideration. Oral contracts are enforceable as long as they contain the essential parts of the contract.
To know more about legal issues visit :
https://brainly.com/question/24791318
#SPJ4
contrast the foreign policies of roosevelt, taft, and wilson. drag each policy to the correct president. a) moral diplomacy. b) big stick diplomacy. c) dollar diplomacy.
These are the main ideas of the foreign policies of Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson.
Intervene with the military force - Theodore Roosevelt.
Invested in foreign economies - William H. Taft.
Acted based on moral imperatives - Woodrow Wilson.
President Theodore Roosevelt was the president from 1901 to 1909.
He was a Republican.
His foreign policy was based on the concept of "Big Stick."
He threatened to use force when it was necessary.
President William H. Taft was the president from 1909 to 1913.
He was a Republican too.
His foreign policy was based on investing in other countries and having economic influence over them.
He developed the concept of "Dollar Diplomacy" in order to invest in underdeveloped countries.
Woodrow Wilson was the president from 1913 to 1921.
He was a Democrat.
He tried to make decisions based on high morals, trying to influence foreign policy.
He decided to stay neutral at the beginning of World War I, until major international incidents forced him to enter World War I.
We conclude that these US Presidents developed different foreign policies, according to their personalities, political conditions, and international circumstances.
Learn more about this foreign policies
https://brainly.com/question/29822820
#SPJ4
which of the following is necessary for someone to file a fair housing complaint against a real estate licensee?
For someone to file a fair housing complaint against a real estate licensee, they must demonstrate that they have experienced "housing discrimination."
The Fair Housing Act (FHA) is a federal law that prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. The FHA applies to all aspects of the sale, rental, and financing of housing, including the activities of real estate licensees. If someone believes that they have been the victim of housing discrimination, they may file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or with a state or local fair housing agency. In order to file a complaint, the person must demonstrate that they have experienced housing discrimination and provide evidence to support their claim.
The complete question is :
which of the following is necessary for someone to file a fair housing complaint against a real estate licensee?
a. Fair Housing Act (FHA)
b. discrimination in housing
c. housing provider
d. Complaints about housing
To learn more about Fair Housing Act (FHA) here:
https://brainly.com/question/14172324
#SPJ4
What does split disburse mean?
Split Disbursement: A Department of Defense-mandated method of ensuring that the traveler's Government travel charge card (GTCC) bill is paid on time.
According to Michael G. Weber, Air Force travel card program manager at the Pentagon, split disbursement requires travelers to total their GTC expenses and authorize enough funds to be sent automatically to Bank of America to pay off their charges. Any outstanding travel settlement will be credited to the traveler's personal account.
"Although the 2003 National Defense Authorization Act mandated this change to reduce the number of delinquent travel card accounts, split disbursement is truly a win-win for everyone," Weber said. "It simplifies the payment process for travelers, gets money to banks faster, and reduces the number of delinquent accounts."
Learn more about split disburse
https://brainly.com/question/14480852
#SPJ4
What law set the rules for admitting new states?
Answer:
Admission to the Union is provided by the Admissions Clause of the United States Constitution in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1, which authorizes the United States Congress to admit new states into the Union beyond the thirteen states that already existed when the Constitution came into effect.
Explanation:
The owner of an electronics store brought a civil suit for the value of stolen electronics against one of his former employees, who had previously been convicted in a criminal court for the theft of the same goods. During the civil trial, the plaintiff-owner called a witness whom he hoped would testify that she saw the defendant in possession of the stolen goods the day after the electronics store was robbed. The witness, however, testified that she did not see the defendant in possession of the goods, and that she was actually out of town the day after the robbery. The plaintiff seeks to introduce the witness's testimony in the criminal case, in which she testified that she saw the defendant in possession of the goods the next day. The defendant objects to the introduction of the statement. Should the court allow the testimony into evidence?
Answers:
Yes, for impeachment only.
Yes, as substantive evidence only.
Yes, for both impeachment and as substantive evidence.
No, not for any reason.
False pretense is the depiction of past or present events in a way that is intended to deceive or create information trial.
The defendant's neighbor's testimony cannot be used to convict him in the circumstances because, although being a witness, she was found guilty of making false statements about the defendant in order to cause her own injuries by spreading a slick liquid on the road and slipping on it. The physician-patient privilege does not apply to the defendant's testimony since it does not cover non-medical information provided by patients. Since the privilege cannot be used when pertaining to information that deals with non-medical information, the court should overturn the objection trial.
Learn more about trial here :
https://brainly.com/question/24260027
#SPJ4
What powers do each branch of government have over the other?
Legislative—Issues laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Executive—Implements laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judicial—Examines laws (Supreme Court and other courts).
The legislative branch creates laws and is represented by the United States Congress; the executive branch enforces laws and is represented by the president and people who report to the president; and the judicial branch evaluates laws and is represented by the Supreme Court and other courts.
The United States Federal Government is divided into three branches to ensure a separation of powers: legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch has its own powers and responsibilities, including working with the other branches, to ensure the government is effective and citizens' rights are protected.
Learn more about legislative branch
https://brainly.com/question/11883152
#SPJ4
To be effective, a code of conduct must stipulate penalties. (true or False)
To be effective, a code of conduct must stipulate penalties is true.
What is code of conduct?A code of conduct is a written statement of the expectations, values, and standards of an organization. A code of conduct is a collection of guidelines established for employees by business owners and HR officials to make sure their conduct is consistent with the company's ideals. A worker who violates the company's code of conduct could face repercussions.
A code of conduct what is it?Definition of a code of conduct An employee code of conduct is a collection of guidelines established by senior management or their advisors that specify what an employee is/is not permitted to do while on the job. (It also explains the penalties that will be imposed on an employee who violates the rules.)
To know more about code of conduct visit:-
brainly.com/question/30099990
#SPJ4
the government protects intellectual property rights by enforcing copyright rules on textbooks. suppose scans the pages of this and other introductory economics textbooks and makes them available for downloading at no charge.
Students or readers would have to make payments for buying an introductory book. But if books are made available for download free of cost, then it would indeed increase the welfare of the students.
Such step of college or school would not benefit students over the long run or next generation might not be benefitted from such a move.
Intellectual property rights induce the firms to make new innovation and introduce new products in the market. But selling books without the permission of the firm would discourage future investment by a firm in new books. So the future generation would be negatively affected by the move of the organization that scans pages.
Learn more about Students
https://brainly.com/question/28047438
#SPJ4
Full Question: The Government Protects Intellectual Property Rights By Enforcing Copyright Rules On Textbooks. Suppose An Organization Scans The Pages Of This And Other Introductory Economics Textbooks And Makes Them Available For Downloading At No Charge. As A Current Textbook Consumer, Would You Be Better Off Or Worse Off? What Are The Implications For The Next
The government protects intellectual property rights by enforcing copyright rules on textbooks. Suppose an organization scans the pages of this and other introductory economics textbooks and makes them available for downloading at no charge. As a current textbook consumer, would you be better off or worse off? What are the implications for the next generation of economics students?
when the result of a lawsuit at the trial court level is appealed, the successful party in the trial court is called the . question 2 options: appellee appellant petitioner counterdefendant counterplaintiff
In a civil lawsuit, either side may appeal to a higher court. The appellant, or petitioner on rare occasions, is the person who filed the appeal.
What is an instance of an appeal?
They would file an appeal against the judgement, he said. We're going to appeal the decision. To prevent her extradition, Maguire has filed an appeal with the Supreme Court. The sentence was later overturned on appeal by Heath.
We utilise appeals because...
In both civil and criminal matters, appeals are typically based on claims that the trial judge misapplied the law or violated procedural rules. The appellant, or petitioner on rare occasions, is the party making the appeal.
know more about occasions:
https://brainly.com/question/29322973
#SPJ4
evaluate the most significant differences in ideas of regional identity in the north and in the south during reconstruction from 1865 to 1877. bolditalicunderline
The most significant difference in ideas of regional identity between the North and the South during Reconstruction (1865-1877) was the extent to which the former Confederate states embraced Reconstruction policies.
The North had a much more unified view of Reconstruction, largely embracing the Radical Republican agenda of extending civil rights and full citizenship to former slaves and attempting to punish former Confederate officials and leaders. In the South, however, Reconstruction policies were seen as an affront to the traditional notion of white supremacy and a violation of states’ rights. This led many in the South to resist Reconstruction policies, and some states even passed “black codes” in an attempt to limit the civil rights of African Americans. This deep divide between the North and South on Reconstruction policies was a major factor in defining the two regions’ respective defendant during this period.
To know more about defendant refer :
brainly.com/question/29646460
#SPJ4
the protection of us _ is one of the goals of the us constitution.
This document's Preamble outlines its six key objectives: to create justice, to guarantee domestic tranquillity, to provide for the common defense, and to advance the public welfare.
What is an example of a preamble?a declaration that is made at the start of something (like a legal document) and typically provides the justification for the sections that follow. [count] We the People of the United States, in order to build a more perfect union, declare in the preamble of the United States Constitution.
Could you describe a preamble?A prologue is a statement that introduces a document and discusses its goals and philosophy. A constitution outlines the goals of its drafters and the background to its formation.
To know more about preamble visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30287427
#SPJ4
what was the first federal constitution under which texas operated?
The Mexican federal Constitution of 1824, which was loosely based on the US Constitution but more reminiscent of the Spanish Constitution of 1812, marked the beginning of constitutional governance in Texas.
What did the 1824 Federal Constitution of Mexico say?In addition to establishing a federal republic made up of 19 states, four territories, and the federal district of Mexico City, the constitution of 1824 also put down a variety of democratic objectives. As government wards, indigenous peoples lost their unique colonial status and the benefits that came with it.
What is the name of the Mexican Constitution?The current Mexican constitution is known officially as the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States (Spanish: Constitución Poltica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos).
To know more about mexican fedaral constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13675534
#SPJ4
true/false. the united states policy that asserts the country's right to engage in a preemptive action when an imminent danger of an attack exists is called containment.
Containment is the assertion that the nation has the right to take preventative measures when there is a real threat of an attack.
Describe a containment example.
For instance, during the Cold War, the United States might deploy economic containment by imposing embargoes on the Soviet Union and China to prevent its adversaries from acquiring military hardware that would increase their military might.
Throughout the Cold War, containment was a key component of American foreign policy. The original 1947 version of the policy, formulated by George F. Kennan, argued that communism needed to be restrained and isolated in order to prevent it from spreading to other nations.
Know more about attack Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14298491
#SPJ4
Anton Ushakov and Marina Kolodkina turned to the notary with a request to certify the marriage contract concluded between them. They explained to the notary that they are not married yet, but they intend to apply to the registry office in 2 months, since Anton is leaving for a long business trip next week. The notary refused to register the contract, offering to apply after the registration of the marriage.
Is the notary's refusal lawful?
Will the situation change if Anton and Marina have already submitted a joint application to the Registry Office for marriage registration at the time of applying to the notary, but the registration itself has not yet been made?
No, the notary's refusal is not lawful. A notary is obligated to certify the marriage contract of a couple, regardless of whether they are married or not. The fact that the couple intends to apply to the registry office in two months does not change this obligation.
What is a notary?Generally, if Anton and Marina have already submitted a joint application to the Registry Office for marriage registration at the time of applying to the notary, then the notary should certify the marriage contract.
In this case, the notary should take into account the fact that the couple is already in the process of registering their marriage and should not refuse to certify the contract.
Read more about notary
https://brainly.com/question/28204126
#SPJ1
documents affecting real estate are recorded or filed with the county in which the property is located to
Real estate-related documents must be filed or recorded in the county where the property is situated. Encourage interested parties.
Describe the documents app.
The most powerful app for your iOS smartphone is Documents. It serves as your files' central location. With just one sophisticated app experience, our app may take the place of a document viewer, PDF reader, "read it later", music and video player, file downloader, cloud integrator, and other helpful programmes.
What does document mean in Word?
An application (such as a spreadsheet or word processor) is typically used to build a new document from an input of data made by a computer user into a computer file. documental.
know more about Encourage :
https://brainly.com/question/28900467
#SPJ4
No tribunal can approach such a question without a deep sense of its importance, and of the awful responsibility involved in its decision. But it must be decided peacefully, or remain a source of hostile legislation, perhaps of hostility of a still more serious nature; and if it is to be so decided, by this tribunal alone can the decision be made. On the Supreme Court of the United States has the constitution of this country devolved this important duty.
The quote given is a statement delivered by the Judge of the Supreme court in the case of "McCulloch v. Maryland". In this case, the court decided that the Federal Government had the power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government.
What was the importance of "McCulloch v. Maryland" case?In McCulloch v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court ruled on March 6, 1819, that Congress had the authority to establish a federal bank and that the financial institution could not be taxed by the states.
This decision had far-reaching implications because it helped establish that the Constitution granted Congress powers that were not explicitly stated in the document. That decision allowed the federal government to grow dramatically over the next two centuries, taking on responsibilities that the nation's founders could not have imagined.
Read more about McCulloch case
brainly.com/question/12575161
#SPJ1
how did josiah respond when he heard the words of the law
He tore his clothes ripped show how horrified he was by how the populace disregarded the law. The kind of sadness God wants us to feel as a result of realizing our faults should "drive us away from sin."
King Josiah started several religious reforms after the book of both the law was found in the temple. The priest Hilkiah was instructed by Josiah to bring forth all the offerings offered to Asherah, Baal, and other deities. He set them afire outside of Jerusalem inside the Kidron fields as well as brought the ashes to Bethel.
King Josiah started several religious reforms because after book of both the law was found in the temple. The priest Hilkiah was instructed by Josiah to bring forth all the offerings offered to Asherah, Baal, and other deities. He set them afire outside of Jerusalem inside the Kidron fields as well as brought the ashes to Bethel.
To know more about law
https://brainly.com/question/6534668
#SPJ4
if a person who lives in one state does business within another state, contracts to supply goods or services within another state, or commits a tort (a civil wrong) in another state, that person may become subject to the jurisdiction of the other state's courts through
If a person who lives in one state business within another state, contracts to supply goods or services within another state, or commits a tort in another state, that person may become subject to the jurisdiction of the other states courts through Application of a long-arm statute Option (C)
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO) was established in 1939 as the administrative agency of the United States federal court system. The AO, as the federal judicial branch's central support entity, provides the federal courts with a wide range of legislative (legislative assistance), administrative, legal, financial, management, program (program evaluation), and information technology support services.
The Judicial Conference of the United States, which is composed of the Chief Justice, the chief judge of each court of appeals, a district court judge from each regional judicial circuit, and the chief judge of the United States Court of International Trade, has direct supervision over it.
Learn more about States Court
https://brainly.com/question/30408538
#SPJ4
Full Question :If a person who lives in one state business within another state, contracts to supply goods or services within another state, or commits a tort in another state, that person may become subject to the jurisdiction of the other states courts through _______________________
A. Proof of a due process violation
B. A property dispute within the state
C. Application of a long-arm statute
what is the name of the political and economic partnership of european countries
The European Union is a special economic and political alliance of 27 nations in Europe with the mission of fostering peace, stability, as well as prosperity in the continent.
Describe the European Union.This same European Union is a special collaboration between 27 member states of the European Union. Together, they encircle a sizable portion of Europe. Around 447 millions of people, or about 6% of the world's population, reside in the EU.
What is the EU renowned for?The biggest business bloc in the universe is the EU. It is the largest producer of consumer products and services in the world, as well as the largest source of imports for more than a hundred nations. One of the founding principles of the EU was free trade among its members.
To know more about European Union visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28632812
#SPJ4
identify the true statements about juran's law, which is a key premise of process thinking. (check all that apply.)
85% of operational problems are due to systematic process errors and 15% of operational problems are the result of human errors the true statements about Juran's law .
In 1937 Joseph Juran explained that this principle also applies to defects. That is, his 80% of problems are caused by his 20% flaws. So if you focus on that 20% of him, you can make a big impact with minimal effort. Juran called this the Pareto principle.
Juran's theory of quality is that top-level management must be committed to quality, otherwise all efforts will fail. According to Juran, quality means that a product meets the customer's needs, which leads to customer satisfaction, and quality is everything a company does to ensure that the product meets the customer's needs.
To know more about Juran's law visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14783496
#SPJ4
The correct question is :
identify the true statements about Juran's law, which is a key premise of process thinking.
depending on the level of intent and culpability, there may be both civil and criminal penalties for failures to comply with a hipaa requirement. which of the following levels may lead to criminal penalties?
Depending on the level of intent and culpability, there may be both civil and criminal penalties for failures to comply with a HIPAA requirement. Criminal penalties may be imposed for the most serious violations, particularly those that are committed knowingly and with malicious intent.
Criminal penalties for HIPAA violations include fines and imprisonment. For example, an individual can face up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 for knowingly and willfully obtaining or disclosing individually identifiable health information in violation of HIPAA. On the other hand, civil penalties for HIPAA violations may include fines of up to $50,000 per violation, with a maximum of $1.5 million per year for multiple violations of the same provision. Civil penalties are typically imposed for less serious violations, such as failures to implement reasonable and appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect health information. In general, HIPAA enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Civil Rights, will consider the level of intent and culpability when determining the appropriate level of penalties for HIPAA violations. This means that individuals and organizations that act knowingly and with malicious intent are more likely to face criminal penalties, while those who violate HIPAA due to ignorance or negligence may be subject to civil penalties.
To learn more about civil penalties here:
https://brainly.com/question/30029167
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. when following a motorcycle, drivers must remember that motorcycles can ___ than other vehicles.
When following a motorcycle, drivers must remember that motorcycles can stop more quickly than other vehicles.
What are the advantages of owning a motorcycle?Owning a motorbike has a number of advantages, including as lower maintenance and petrol costs, improved manoeuvrability in traffic, and the ability to park in tight areas. Another benefit of riding a motorbike is the sense of freedom and adventure it may bring, as well as a special and close connection to the road. In addition, motorbikes provide a speedier and more effective means of transportation in crowded locations. They may also be a fantastic choice for road vacations or beautiful drives. However, it's crucial to remember that compared to vehicles, motorbikes provide more safety dangers, necessitating the need for appropriate training, equipment, and defensive riding techniques.
To learn more about motorcycle visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29333261
#SPJ4
A man witnessed a hit-and-run accident in which a truck struck and killed a child. Shortly after the accident, the witness gave police a signed, handwritten statement with a description of the truck, including the make and model, as well as a description of the driver of the truck. After several months, the authorities identified and charged a man who fit the witness's description, although the pickup truck was never located. In the interim, however, the witness had suffered a brain injury and no longer remembered any of the events from the date of the accident. At trial, the prosecutor called the witness to testify. The prosecutor first showed the witness a photo of a vehicle of the same make and model as the truck in an attempt to refresh the witness's memory. The defense objected but was overruled by the judge. When this failed to refresh the witness's memory, the prosecutor showed the witness his earlier handwritten and signed statement. Again, the defense objected and was overruled. The witness testified that he had no memory of the events described in the statement, but that he recognized his handwriting on the statement and that the statement accurately reflected what he witnessed at the time. The prosecutor then moved to introduce the photo and statement into evidence as exhibits, and the defense again objected. How should the judge rule?
A. The judge should admit both the photo and the statement into evidence as exhibits.
B. The judge should admit the photo, but not the statement, into evidence as an exhibit.
C. The judge should admit the statement, but not the photo, into evidence as an exhibit.
D. The judge should not admit the photo or the statement into evidence as exhibits.
The photo and the statement shouldn't be allowed as exhibits by the judge.
In general, a person qualified to attest to the correctness of an image must properly verify it under oath in order for it to be acceptable. Exhibits or Marks are the names given to official documents that are produced at the evidence stage. There is no distinction between them, and both must be proven in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act. The photo and the statement shouldn't be allowed as exhibits by the judge. The courts will assess their evidentiary value at the time of the final judgement. Evidence that unfairly hurts, hurts, hurts, hurts, or biases the case without proving any proper facts and enrages the jury or the court without presenting any crucial facts but frequently relies on supposition.
Learn more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/29973933
#SPJ4
halogenics, inc., manufactures a medical device that is heavily regulated by the government and has to undergo a rigorous pre-market approval process. halogenics can use the following defense if it is sued:
halogenics, inc., manufactures a medical device that is heavily regulated by the government Preemption
An organised community is ruled by a structure or a collection of people, usually a state.When defining government broadly and associatively, the legislative, executive, and judicial branches are frequently included. Government serves as both a tool for formulating and enforcing organisational policy. In many countries, a statement of the governing philosophy and guiding ideas serves as the equivalent of a constitution.Even though all organisations have governance, the term "government" is typically used more specifically to refer to the roughly 200 autonomous national governments and subsidiary organisations.The four primary types of political systems in the modern era are democracies, monarchies, authoritarian, and totalitarian regimes.A state's or a community's system of government
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
identify a mechanism that allows employees to report wrongdoing and to create further mechanisms for follow-up and enforcement. multiple choice mission statement ethics hotlines code of conduct accountability
The correct option (A) ethics hotlines
An ethics hotline, also known as a compliance hotline, is a confidential reporting tool that allows employees to report and potentially uncover illegal, unethical, or improper behavior. When standard channels of communication have proven to be ineffective or impractical in the circumstances, this communication is used.
An employee should be able to report potentially illegal, unethical, and/or improper behavior to an ethics hotline if they believe they have witnessed or experienced it. The ethics hotline is usually provided by a third party, so there are no conflicts of interest with the company receiving the report. Furthermore, the ethics hotline provider should allow for anonymous reporting so that employees feel safe speaking up without fear of retaliation.
Learn more about ethics hotline
https://brainly.com/question/14971675
#SPJ4
Full question :Identify a mechanism that allows employees to report wrongdoing and to create further mechanisms for follow-up and enforcement.
Multiple Choice
Mission statement
Accountability
Ethics hotlines
Code of conduct
can a defendant be set free if the appellate court finds that the illegally obtained evidence was so critical to the prosecution's case that it cannot be reasonably said that the defendant would have been convicted without it.
Verdict. A judge's determination that evidence is inadequate to warrant a conviction or a jury's decision that what a criminal defendant isn't really guilty
The Magistrate will release the suspect from the case in accordance with Section 245(1) Cr. P.C. after considering the evidence presented pursuant to Section 244 Cr. P.C. and concluding that no lawsuit has been made out from the accused, meaning that if unrebutted, it will not warrant a conviction. Without a doubt, the burden of proof rests with the prosecution to show beyond a reasonable question that the accused possessed the necessary mens rea to conduct the crime. After that, there would be an inference that the defendant was mentally sound when he committed a crime. The burden of establishing the facts supporting the case
Learn more about crime
https://brainly.com/question/14463204
#SPJ4