A provision of the supreme court ruling on the Scott v. Sandford case was later overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution.
What was important about the Supreme Court's ruling in Scott v Sandford?The ruling of the United States Supreme Court held that all African Americans, whether they were in slavery or not, lacked the ability to file a lawsuit in federal court since they were not citizens of the country. In deciding as it did, the Supreme Court also decided that the federal government could not forbid slavery in the territories.
The 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, which outlawed slavery and proclaimed all people born in the United States to be citizens, overturned the Scott v. Sandford ruling, which many legal scholars believe to be the worst decision ever made by the Supreme Court.
Learn more about Scott v Sandford here:
https://brainly.com/question/12359809
#SPJ4
An examination of fear of crime studies shows that fear of being a victim of a terrorist attack is much higher than that of more common crimes and homicide. Given the limited number of terrorist attacks on American soil and the limited number of deaths and injuries, why does fear of a terrorist attack rank so high?
The fear of a terrorist attack is one that has been rank so high because Americans has made a lot of enemies in this past years such as Russian, North Korea, China and others.
What is meant by the word terrorist attack?A terrorist attack is known to be a kind of violent form of an incident, that is known to be made up of murder and bombing, genocide, etc.
This is known to be an action that is said to be carried out by people who are said to be acting on behalf of their goal or country to attain political aims.
Terrorism is said to be a kind of an unlawful duty that entails the use of force or violence against persons or property .
Therefore, The fear of a terrorist attack is one that has been rank so high because Americans has made a lot of enemies in this past years such as Russian, North Korea, China and others.
Learn more about terrorist attack from
https://brainly.com/question/27720927
#SPJ1
In the context of a court case process, what is the definition of affirmation?
Answer:
An affirmation is a declaration that something is true. In a legal context, it is a formal statement made under oath.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
How much is the fine for violating any of the restrictions of the gdl permit or probationary license?.
Medicare Parts C and D sponsors are not required to have a compliance
program.
a. True
b. False
Medicare Parts C and D sponsors are not required to have a compliance program. This statement is false.
As a condition of their ongoing participation, providers and suppliers engaged in federal healthcare programs are required by Section 6401(a)(7) of the Act to establish and maintain compliance systems.
Everyone is responsible for compliance! Every decision you make might have an impact on Medicare beneficiaries, the Medicare Program, or the Medicare Trust Fund if you are a person who offers medical or administrative services to Medicare enrollees.
For those utilizing Medicare Parts C and D, there are certain training requirements. All workers at Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) and Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs), together referred to as "Sponsors" in this course, are required to complete training on CMS program compliance.
Learn more about Medicare training here:
https://brainly.com/question/28069617
#SPJ4
A researcher wants to study the effects of a new drug on fetal development. Before testing the drug on pregnant women, the researcher first wants to ensure that it is indeed safe on humans. To do this, the research team recruits inmates at a local prison and offers to compensate each participant with $30.
From the situation that we have here, this cannot be said to be ethical. The justification here is that the people in these areas are humans.
What is the justification to why this is unethical?This is because the use of inmates as the test or the lab rats is unfair. Because they are inmates in the prison does not make them to be more or less human beings. They should still be treated in the right way. The use of human subjects on new drugs is an unethical practice.
The way that the drug should be testedThe first way would have to be through the laboratories. When it is able to pass the tests in the laboratories and considered safe, then it can be tested on animals in order to see if it would have any side effects before it would be tested on humans.
Read more on research here: https://brainly.com/question/25257437
#SPJ1
complete question
You are on the IRB committee and need to determine if the project is ethical or not. Justify your answers below. Then, if you stated the project had an ethical violation, provide a way in which the researcher could modify the study to make it more ethical. Note: do not assume the researcher will complete steps not otherwise indicated.
analyze the impact of gender based violence on individual or community
Answer:
lower productivity and thus reduced economic output and growth, and increased pressure on social and health services.
Explanation:
Since the start of the 1970s, how has the supreme court ruled regarding the commerce clause of the constitution?.
The supreme court decided on the commerce clause of the constitution, limiting Congress' authority to employ the commerce clause to address national concerns.
What is a supreme court?Supreme court, refers to the highest court of justice which ensures people to receive the justice in the eyes of the law. The court act as protector and interpretation of the constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled on the constitution's commerce clause, restricting Congress' ability to use the section to address national problems.
Therefore, it can be concluded that commerce clause to address national concerns.
Learn more about supreme court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
The u. S. Supreme court has ____________ jurisdiction involving disputes between states.
Answer:The U. S. Supreme court has Original Jurisdiction involving disputes between states.
Explanation:
Identify one deficient aspect of Pakistani law or any aspect of the legal system that you disagree with. Explain your reasoning and lay out a framework for how you would resolve it.
One poor thing about Pakistani regulation or any component of the legal system that you disagree with: Many people within the united states of America are unhappy with the Judicial gadget u. s .. they have got misplaced religion within the judicial machine of Pakistan.
A legal system is a procedure or process for deciphering and enforcing the regulation. The 3 foremost legal structures of the world consist of civil law, common law, and spiritual law. other legal structures are: Jury device is a felony device for determining the information at the difficulty in a lawsuit.
A quick Primer on the world's legal system
There are normally considered to be five criminal systems in the international these days: civil regulation, commonplace law, normal law, spiritual law, and blended felony systems. Civil regulation systems have their starting place inside the Roman prison way of life.
As attorneys recognize, the legal systems in international locations around the arena generally fall into certainly one of the fundamental classes: not unusual regulation systems and civil law systems.
Learn more about the legal system here: https://brainly.com/question/7694457
#SPJ9
In ______ states, there are more daily newspapers paying attention to policy and educational matters than in individualistic states.
In Moralistic states, there are more daily newspapers paying attention to policy and educational matters than in individualistic states.
The US States are cut down into three different categories namely the moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic.
Moralistic states are states which believe that the government should be active in promoting the public good and that citizens should participate in politics and gain civic duties. These are states settles by the puritans and northern Europeans.Concentrated in New England, Upper Midwest and West.Brings people together on the same line for a better understanding and working Moralistic culture works best for policy analysisTo know more about US states:
brainly.com/question/11192340
#SPJ4
What is the judge's role in jury deliberations? (Select all that apply.)
The judge is available to answer questions of law during deliberations.
None. Once the trial is sent to the jury, the judge has no responsibilities.
The judge guides the jury on legal questions while they are deliberating.
The judge gives instructions to the jury to help them during their deliberations.
Answer: Working Together: Judge and Jury
Explanation: The judge determines the appropriate law that should be applied to the case and the jury finds the facts in the case based on what is presented to them during the proceedings. At the end of a trial, the judge instructs the jury on the applicable law.
Discribe how the following concepts could help to fight social challenges :social and environmental responsibility
Social and environmental responsibility can combat social concerns by contributing in their resolution. When an individual or a group takes on the responsibility of protecting society and the environment, it can help to alleviate social problems. Many people and corporations, for example, organize food drives to combat poverty. Economic activities grow in a stable community with a good environmental atmosphere, which is why social and environmental responsibility may help fight poverty.
Environmental and social responsibility considers issues of people, planet, and profit that contribute to long-term competitive advantage. Developing socially responsible and sustainable employment practices assists companies in meeting current demands while preserving their potential to fulfil future requirements.
To learn more about Environmental, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/21976584
#SPJ4
Question 5 of 10
what are two broad categories of tort remedies?
a. damages and writs
b. temporary and permanent injunctions
c. damages and compensation
d. damages and injunctions
Damages and compensation are two broad categories of tort remedies. Damages are granted for bodily harm, whereas compensation is on a higher level. Compensation seeks to put the injured party in the same situation as if the injury had not occurred by providing monetary compensation for the harm done.
While 'damages' categories refers to compensation awarded or sought, 'damage' refers to the hurt or loss for which compensation is claimed or awarded. 'Damage' can relate to monetary or non-monetary compensation , whereas 'damages' refer to monetary recompense. Payment or reward for work or services provided, or for injury incurred, is referred to as compensation.
To learn more about categories, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8866495
#SPJ4
The issue of unemployment and declining wages on the west coast led to which of the legislative actions?.
The issue of unemployment and declining wages on the west coast led to Dawes, Homestead act of the legislative actions.
Industrialization created low-wage, low-skill jobs with workers who can be replaced easily. overproduction leading to low prices for products and debt for farmers. Schools promoted the employment and study of diverse languages. Schools allowed for various legislative actions culture groups to measure more closely.
Knights of Labor were members were skilled and unskilled workers, rallied for shorter work days, equal legislative actions get men and ladies, and to finish child labor. Its founding marked the start of union activism within the era.
The Knights however declined in status thanks to being associated to the Haymarket bombing, and therefore the legislative actions proven fact that they allowed in unskilled workers, giving the skilled workers a sense of superiority. Americanization Movement. This movement was sponsored by the govt. and anxious citizens.
learn more about legislative actions: https://brainly.com/question/11821265
#SPJ4
Which amendment would someone most likely use to argue that people should be allowed to own guns?.
the Second Amendment would be someone presumably used to argue that people should be allowed to own guns.
Under U.S. Constitution, The Second Amendment ensures the proper of the people to keep and bear arms, after the setting, the aim , and therefore the objectives of the draftsmen who can't understand the clause,the second amendment guarantees that a well regulated Militia, being important for the security of a free State, the proper of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, the need for state militia predicated as a right gurantee, as so to guard the state while not its purpose is different, Since American has the proper to protect their homes, and nobody can undermine their right. it's desirable for the state for having reasonable regulations for the ownership and the usage of a firearm in an effort to stop mindless homicidal carnage.
To know more about the Second Amendment refer to the link brainly.com/question/8244125?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
can a person belong to more than one culture, or are they neglecting their original identity when adapting to a new culture?
Yes a person can belong to more than one culture. Multiple cultural identities may be encouraged or required by people's lived experiences, either freely or unintentionally.
More about Culture and identity:
Our feeling of cultural identity helps us feel connected. We seek out people whose worldviews, attitudes, and practises align with our own in order to build relationships and win their acceptance.
Global cultural variety and intergroup contact are growing as a result of modernization, migration, and interethnic/religious marriages. Many people may have ancestries that incorporate more than one cultural background as a result of this increased cultural contact.
Learn more about Culture and identity here:
https://brainly.com/question/5591199
#SPJ9
Which statement describes the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor?
Question 5 options:
A felony can result in jail time, while a misdemeanor results only in fines.
A felony is a serious crime, while a misdemeanor is a relatively minor offense.
A felony is a violation of criminal law, while a misdemeanor is a violation of civil law.
A felony causes injury to a person, while a misdemeanor causes injury to property.
The statement that describes the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor is that a felony can result in jail time while a misdemeanor results only in fines.
What are felonies and misdemeanours?Both the felonies and misdemeanours are a class of minor offenses that may be described as petty offenses or quasi-crimes before the law. These offenses are created by local ordinance or by regulatory statute, and the requirement of trial by jury does not apply.
Most time, the felony is defined as a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment of one year or more while the Misdemeanours are often defined as offenses punishable only by fines or by short terms of imprisonment in local jails.
Read more about felonies
brainly.com/question/20348390
#SPJ1
A private nuisance occurs when a person permanently removes personal property from the owner’s possession and control. True or false?.
It is false, that A private nuisance occurs when a person permanently removes personal property from the owner’s possession and control.
When a person permanently removes personal property from the owner's possession and control that occurs in conversion, the owner recovers the damages of the converted item for the full value, even possession of stolen goods makes it liable. While private nuisance occurs when the enjoyment and plaintiff's use of his or her property is disturbed unreasonably through an activity or thing and public nuisance occurs when the person is been interfered unreasonably with the right that the general public share equally in common.
To know more about private nuisnace and public nuisance refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/17751112?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
The first law requiring food labels to contain nutrition information was passed in 2000. True or false?.
Answer:
the answer is false because
Explanation:
it was passed in 1973
Which of the following statements about the functions of Congress is true, based on the infographic?
A. Writing and approving legislation is a rapid and efficient process.
B. A bill that is approved by a committee is guaranteed to become a law.
C. A bill may be killed at many points throughout the lawmaking process.
D. A bill is considered to be a law when the Senate and the House agree on its wording.
Answer: C.) A bill may be killed at many points throughout the lawmaking process.
Explanation: just took test
In Florida, how many kinds of field sobriety tests are
there?
There are many teenagers who would like to work at gas stations, but they are not hired due to minimum-wage laws. True or false?.
Answer:false
Explanation:
Some of the ambulance personnel who died on September 11th were working for
private ambulance companies; what does this BEST illustrates?
(1 point)
о
Important public services may be performed by private companies paid from public
funds.
Training in private companies is often inadequate and inferior to training for public
services.
Both private and public service workers need to be recognized for their heroic
efforts.
O There was a widespread shortage of ambulance drivers before September 11th.
1 of 15
The best solution that shows what is illustrated would be that There was a widespread shortage of ambulance drivers before September 11th.
What is the the meaning of shortage?This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that the number of people that are available to provide a given service are few in number or it tells us that the people that would be able to take care of the production of a particular good are not available.
The event of September 11th was one that involved a lot of pain to Americans because they were attacked by terrorists on their own soil. They were killed and injured in a large number hence the need for the ambulances.
Because of the shortage of the drivers in the public sector, the private sector had to take over the delivery of the services.
Read more on September 11th here:
https://brainly.com/question/27171422
#SPJ1
This week we learned that most sheriffs are elected and most police chiefs are appointed. Do you believe chiefs should be elected as well? Or both sheriffs and chiefs appointed? Should law enforcement be tied to politics through an election at all? Explain your answer.
1. The election of police chiefs is good for democracy as it allows the people to participate in selecting the head of this important government agency or department.
2. It is also necessary to elect sheriffs, who are county heads of law enforcement. Sheriffs' elections will guarantee better performance.
3. Law enforcement is not tied to politics through the election of the police chief and the sheriff. Instead, their election removes them from politics, especially when they are not contesting under any political party.
Why it is necessary to elect police chiefs?The election of police chiefs by the electorate involves the general voting public to determine the level and use of force to keep the community safe.
This system is a democratic process for the people in the community are involved in choosing who gets elected for law enforcement.
Election removes the position of the chief of police from the political manipulations of the politicians.
Thus, the election of the chief of police ensures that the best resident is chosen for the job, irrespective of their academic qualifications and political affiliations.
Learn more about elections for police chiefs at https://brainly.com/question/13868604
#SPJ1
Ano ang kahulugan ng talos-tanod
Answer:
Here is the answer..
TALOS-TANOD
Does the constitution require that members of the u. S. House of representatives live in the congressional districts that they represent?.
No, the constitution didn't require that members of U. S. House of representatives live in the congressional districts that they represent.
What is the power of the House of Representatives?The House has a number of exclusive rights, including the ability to introduce revenue legislation, remove federal officials from office, and choose the President in the event of a deadlock in the Electoral College.
A member of the House must be at least 25 years old, a citizen of the United States for at least seven years, and a resident of the state they are elected to represent, according to the Constitution (though not necessarily the same district).
No one may serve as a representative if they have not attained the age of twenty-five, have not been citizens of the United States for seven years, and are not residents of the state in which they are chosen at the time of their election.
Learn more about the House of Representative's power here:
https://brainly.com/question/28257817
#SPJ4
What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.
2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments. Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.
What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:
Prevent terrorismEnhance securitySecure and manage U.S. bordersEnforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.
Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:
Border securityAviation securityCountering terrorismEmergency responseChemical facility inspectionIT and cybersecurity securityNatural disaster planning and response.Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.
Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at https://brainly.com/question/19521614
#SPJ1
Court reporters must produce an accurate, word-for-word transcript of a trial. What is the modern way to do
that?
O Writing notes by hand.
O Using shorthand
O Using a stenotype machine.
O With audio recordings.
Using a stenotype machine is the modern method for court reporters to obtain an exact, word-for-word transcript of a trial.
The majority of court reporters, including myself, have encountered that query dozens, if not hundreds of times throughout the course of our careers. The people who typically ask this at depositions from our steno machines are witnesses, along with variations like "Is that shorthand?" "I don't know how you type on that little thing," I said. And the classic question of every court reporter, "Now, did you go to school for that?"
Of course, I also explain as succinctly as I can how I manage to work my steno machine, as do probably most of us. However, these are actually excellent questions given that nobody else in the world, court reporters outside us court reporters, has any notion whatsoever of how we go about doing what we do.
Learn more about court reporters here
https://brainly.com/question/15053645
#SPJ9
Discuss the difference between respondent and operant conditioning, using examples for each.
Answer: Classical conditioning involves associating an involuntary response and a stimulus, while operant conditioning is about associating a voluntary behavior and a consequence. In respondent conditioning, the US could be an appetitive or aversive stimulus. For instance, in appetitive conditioning, the US would be something desirable such as candy which makes us happy. Other examples could include water, food, sex, or drugs. For example, when lab rats press a lever when a green light is on, they receive a food pellet as a reward. When they press the lever when a red light is on, they receive a mild electric shock. As a result, they learn to press the lever when the green light is on and avoid the red light.
Explanation:
a case from the supreme court of north carolina is published in which west reporter?